Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Papatsoris, Athanasios (8649131300)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus on miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    (2024)
    Zeng, Guo-Hua (57188648407)
    ;
    Zhong, Wen (8313474600)
    ;
    Mazzon, Giorgio (6506702148)
    ;
    Zhu, Wei (57164187600)
    ;
    Lahme, Sven (7004082271)
    ;
    Khadgi, Sanjay (55883329700)
    ;
    Desai, Janak (55821908900)
    ;
    Agrawal, Madhu (56250104800)
    ;
    Schulsinger, David (6602468962)
    ;
    Gupta, Mantu (7403987277)
    ;
    Montanari, Emanuele (7006516396)
    ;
    Martinez, Juan Manuel Lopez (56517815400)
    ;
    Almousawi, Shabir (57208554642)
    ;
    Malonzo, Vincent Emanuel F. (59389931500)
    ;
    Sriprasad, Seshadri (56091601300)
    ;
    Durutovic, Otas (6506011266)
    ;
    Arumuham, Vimoshan (57190001434)
    ;
    Ferretti, Stefania (57205413876)
    ;
    Kamal, Wissam (55569014500)
    ;
    Xu, Ke-Wei (55712648400)
    ;
    Cheng, Fan (57216252637)
    ;
    Gao, Xiao-Feng (55712094400)
    ;
    Cheng, Ji-Wen (35190046200)
    ;
    Somani, Bhaskar (57218701740)
    ;
    Duvdevani, Mordechai (6507904635)
    ;
    Git, Kah Ann (56943350600)
    ;
    Seitz, Christian (56701048400)
    ;
    Bernardo, Norberto (7004607422)
    ;
    Ibrahim, Tarek Ahmed Amin (56609863500)
    ;
    Aquino, Albert (57216969359)
    ;
    Yasui, Takahiro (55279661300)
    ;
    Fiori, Cristian (7006564096)
    ;
    Knoll, Thomas (35518145300)
    ;
    Papatsoris, Athanasios (8649131300)
    ;
    Gadzhiev, Nariman (56624338800)
    ;
    Zhanbyrbekuly, Ulanbek (57209139775)
    ;
    Angerri, Oriol (6508042354)
    ;
    Ramos, Hugo Lopez (57200249324)
    ;
    Saltirov, Iliya (6603373982)
    ;
    Moussa, Mohamad (13612493000)
    ;
    Giusti, Guido (7102670097)
    ;
    Vicentini, Fabio (15830653300)
    ;
    Suarez, Edgar Beltran (59389931600)
    ;
    Pearle, Margaret (7006417553)
    ;
    Preminger, Glenn M. (7101748407)
    ;
    Wu, Qing-Hui (7404602974)
    ;
    Ghani, Khurshid (6602352670)
    ;
    Maroccolo, Marcus (57201687529)
    ;
    Brehmer, Marianne (55907464400)
    ;
    Osther, Palle J. (7003403437)
    ;
    Zawadzki, Marek (58045474300)
    ;
    Tursunkulov, Azimdjon (58090854500)
    ;
    Kytaibekovich, Monolov Nurbek (59389589700)
    ;
    Abuvohidov, Abdusamad Abdukakhorovich (59389589800)
    ;
    Lara, Cesar Antonio Recalde (59389466000)
    ;
    Noori, Zamari (59389707100)
    ;
    Zanetti, Stefano Paolo (57193090550)
    ;
    Shrestha, Sunil (57191475496)
    ;
    de la Rosette, Jean (7102844406)
    ;
    Denstedt, John (7006669826)
    ;
    Ye, Zhang-Qun (7401956734)
    ;
    Sarica, Kemal (7005266964)
    ;
    Choong, Simon (55184513600)
    Over the past three decades, there has been increasing interest in miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) techniques featuring smaller tracts as they offer potential solutions to mitigate complications associated with standard PCNL (sPCNL). However, despite this growing acceptance and recognition of its benefits, unresolved controversies and acknowledged limitations continue to impede widespread adoption due to a lack of consensus on optimal perioperative management strategies and procedural tips and tricks. In response to these challenges, an international panel comprising experts from the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) took on the task of compiling an expert consensus document on mPCNL procedures aimed at providing urologists with a comprehensive clinical framework for practice. This endeavor involved conducting a systematic literature review to identify research gaps (RGs), which formed the foundation for developing a structured questionnaire survey. Subsequently, a two-round modified Delphi survey was implemented, culminating in a group meeting to generate final evidence-based comments. All 64 experts completed the second-round survey, resulting in a response rate of 100.0%. Fifty-eight key questions were raised focusing on mPCNLs within 4 main domains, including general information (13 questions), preoperative work-up (13 questions), procedural tips and tricks (19 questions), and postoperative evaluation and follow-up (13 questions). Additionally, 9 questions evaluated the experts’ experience with PCNLs. Consensus was reached on 30 questions after the second-round survey, while professional statements for the remaining 28 key questions were provided after discussion in an online panel meeting. mPCNL, characterized by a tract smaller than 18 Fr and an innovative lithotripsy technique, has firmly established itself as a viable and effective approach for managing upper urinary tract stones in both adults and pediatrics. It offers several advantages over sPCNL including reduced bleeding, fewer requirements for nephrostomy tubes, decreased pain, and shorter hospital stays. The series of detailed techniques presented here serve as a comprehensive guide for urologists, aiming to improve their procedural understanding and optimize patient outcomes. © The Author(s) 2024.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Pulsed versus continuous mode fluoroscopy during PCNL: safety and effectiveness comparison in a case series study
    (2016)
    Durutovic, Otas (6506011266)
    ;
    Dzamic, Zoran (6506981365)
    ;
    Milojevic, Bogomir (36990126400)
    ;
    Nikic, Predrag (55189551300)
    ;
    Mimic, Ana (55865595300)
    ;
    Bumbasirevic, Uros (36990205400)
    ;
    Vuksanovic, Aleksandar (6602999284)
    ;
    Petronic, Dragica Milenkovic (56676323500)
    ;
    Papatsoris, Athanasios (8649131300)
    ;
    Skolarikos, Andreas (6602103893)
    To compare the total fluoroscopy time (FT) based on the fluoroscopy mode used—continuous vs. pulsed—in patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The study cohort evaluated 111 patients who underwent PCNL by a single surgeon. Standard (continuous) fluoroscopy of 30 frames per second (fps) was used in the first 56 cases (SF group), while the next 55 consecutive cases were performed under pulsed fluoroscopy of two fps (PF group). The presence of surgeon’s previous experience decreased the possible impact of the learning curve on the outcome. In both groups, using ultrasound in combination to fluoroscopy performed the renal access. The stone complexity was determined using Guy’s stone score (GSS). Complications were evaluated using Clavien-Dindo classification. Median FT was significantly lower in PF group (76.8 s) compared to SF group (155.4 s) (p < 0.001). Stone-free rate was related to the Guy’s stone score (GSS) classification reaching 100 % in GSS 1 cases in both groups. In GSS 2 cases the stone free rate was 87.5 % in SF group, while in PF group it was 92.3 %. Stone free rate in GSS 3 cases was 73.3 and 85.7 % in SF and PF groups, respectively. In cases of GSS 4 stone free rate was 52 % in SF group and 55.6 % in PF group, respectively. Presence of residual fragments and complications were comparable in both groups. Following ultrasound-guided puncture during PCNL, the use of pulsed fluoroscopy leads to significantly lower radiation exposure comparing to the use of continuous fluoroscopy. This advantage does not compromise the safety and efficacy of the procedure. © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback