Browsing by Author "Padjen, Visnja (55605274200)"

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether pretreatment with metformin (MET) is associated with less stroke severity and better outcome after IV thrombolysis (IVT), we analyzed a cohort of 1,919 patients with stroke with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a multicenter exploratory analysis.MethodsData from patients with diabetes and ischemic stroke treated with IVT were collected within the European Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP) collaboration. We applied propensity score matching (PSM) to obtain balanced baseline characteristics of patients treated with and without MET.ResultsOf 1,919 patients with stroke with type 2 diabetes who underwent IVT, 757 (39%) had received MET before stroke (MET+), whereas 1,162 (61%) had not (MET-). MET+ patients were younger with a male preponderance. Hypercholesterolemia and pretreatment with statins, antiplatelets, or antihypertensives were more common in the MET+ group. After PSM, the 2 groups were well balanced with respect to demographic and clinical aspects. Stroke severity on admission (NIH Stroke Scale 10.0 ± 6.7 vs 11.3 ± 6.5), 3-month degree of independence on modified Rankin Scale (2 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.0-4.0] vs 3 [IQR 1.0-4.0]), as well as mortality (12.5% vs 18%) were significantly lower in the MET+ group. The frequency of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages did not differ between groups. HbA1c levels were well-balanced between the groups.ConclusionsPatients with stroke and diabetes on treatment with MET receiving IVT had less severe strokes on admission and a better functional outcome at 3 months. This suggests a protective effect of MET resulting in less severe strokes as well as beneficial thrombolysis outcome. © American Academy of Neurology.

In the published article, the reference for (17) was incorrectly written as Strambo D. Acute bihemispheric stroke from a single carotid source: risk factors, mechanism and outcome. J Vasc Interv Neurol. (2021) 12:24–33. It should be Scoppettuolo P, Strambo D, Nannoni S, Dunet V, Sirimarco G, Michel P. Acute bihemispheric stroke from a single carotid source: risk factors, mechanism and outcome. J Vasc Interv Neurol. (2021) 12:24–33. 10.5281/zenodo.10391282. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. Copyright © 2024 Filioglo, Simaan, Honig, Heldner, Pezzini, Martinez-Majander, Padjen, Baumgartner, Papanagiotou, Salerno, Nolte, Nordanstig, Engelter, Zini, Zedde, Marto, Arnold, Magoni, Gensicke, Cohen and Leker.

In the published article, the reference for (17) was incorrectly written as Strambo D. Acute bihemispheric stroke from a single carotid source: risk factors, mechanism and outcome. J Vasc Interv Neurol. (2021) 12:24–33. It should be Scoppettuolo P, Strambo D, Nannoni S, Dunet V, Sirimarco G, Michel P. Acute bihemispheric stroke from a single carotid source: risk factors, mechanism and outcome. J Vasc Interv Neurol. (2021) 12:24–33. 10.5281/zenodo.10391282. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. Copyright © 2024 Filioglo, Simaan, Honig, Heldner, Pezzini, Martinez-Majander, Padjen, Baumgartner, Papanagiotou, Salerno, Nolte, Nordanstig, Engelter, Zini, Zedde, Marto, Arnold, Magoni, Gensicke, Cohen and Leker.

Background Data based on randomized clinical trials regarding the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) versus placebo or any other antithrombotic agent in the treatment of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) are unavailable.; Methods Prospectively collected data on AF-associated stroke patients treated in a 3-year period were analyzed to assess the effect of IVT treatment. Outcome measures were modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score for functional outcome, death, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH).; Results Of 787 patients diagnosed with an acute ischemic stroke in the observed period, 131 (16.6%) had AF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis after adjustment for confounders demonstrated that independent predictors of excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) in patients with AF-associated stroke were lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR],.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-.94; P =.000) and the use of IVT (adjOR, 5.31; 95% CI, 1.90-14.82; P =.001), whereas independent predictors of death were higher baseline NIHSS score (adjOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12; P =.003), previous stroke (adjOR, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.49-11.35; P =.006), absence of IVT use (adjOR,.19; 95% CI,.05-.77; P =.021), sICH (adjOR, 18.52; 95% CI, 1.59-215.37; P =.020), and higher serum glucose levels (adjOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06-1.50; P =.008). Thrombolyzed patients with AF were less severe at baseline and were less likely to have NIHSS >18. They were more likely to have excellent and good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) whereas less likely to have death as outcome at 3 months. Thrombolyzed AF patients had constantly lower probability of death regardless of the baseline NIHSS score values.; Conclusions These results should encourage the use of IVT in AF-associated strokes. © 2014 National Stroke Association.

Background: Acute intracranial occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) can be distinguished into (a) occlusion of the terminal ICA, involving the proximal segments of the middle or anterior cerebral artery (ICA-L/-T) and (b) non-terminal intracranial occlusions of the ICA with patent circle of Willis (ICA-I). While patients with ICA-L/-T occlusion were included in all randomized controlled trials on endovascular therapy (EVT) in anterior large vessel occlusion, data on EVT in ICA-I occlusion is scarce. We thus aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of EVT in ICA-I occlusions in comparison to ICA-L/-T occlusions. Methods: A large international multicentre cohort was searched for patients with intracranial ICA occlusion treated with EVT between 2014 and 2023. Patients were stratified by ICA occlusion pattern, differentiating ICA-I and ICA-L/-T occlusions. Baseline factors, technical (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) scale) and functional outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS] at 3 months) as well as rates of (symptomatic) intracranial hemorrhage ([s]ICH) were analyzed. Results: Of 13,453 patients, 1825 (13.6%) had isolated ICA occlusion. ICA-occlusion pattern was ICA-I in 559 (4.2%) and ICA-L/-T in 1266 (9.4%) patients. Age (years: 74 vs 73), sex (female: 45.8% vs 49.0%) and pre-stroke functional independency (pre-mRS ⩽ 2: 89.9% vs 92.2%) did not differ between the groups. Stroke severity was lower in ICA-I patients (NIHSS at admission: 14 [7–19] vs 17 [13–21] points). EVT was similarly successful with respect to technical (mTICI2b/3: 76.1% (ICA-I) vs 76.6% (ICA-L/-T); aOR 1.01 [0.76–1.35]) and functional outcome (mRS ordinal shift cOR 1.01 [0.83–1.23] in adjusted analyses. Rates of ICH (18.9% vs 34.5%; aOR 0.47 [0.36–0.62] and sICH (4.7% vs 7.3%; aOR 0.58 [0.35–0.97] were lower in ICA-I patients. Conclusion: EVT might be performed safely and similarly successful in patients with ICA-I occlusions as in patients with ICA-L/-T occlusions. © European Stroke Organisation 2024.

Purpose The Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP) collaboration was a concerted effort initiated in 2010 with the purpose to address relevant research questions about the effectiveness and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). The collaboration also aims to prospectively collect data on patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) and hence the name of the collaboration was changed from TRISP to EVA-TRISP. The methodology of the former TRISP registry for patients treated with IVT has already been published. This paper focuses on describing the EVT part of the registry. Participants All centres committed to collecting predefined variables on consecutive patients prospectively. We aim for accuracy and completeness of the data and to adapt local databases to investigate novel research questions. Herein, we introduce the methodology of a recently constructed academic investigator-initiated open collaboration EVT registry built as an extension of an existing IVT registry in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Findings to date Currently, the EVA-TRISP network includes 20 stroke centres with considerable expertise in EVT and maintenance of high-quality hospital-based registries. Following several successful randomised controlled trials (RCTs), many important clinical questions remain unanswered in the (EVT) field and some of them will unlikely be investigated in future RCTs. Prospective registries with high-quality data on EVT-treated patients may help answering some of these unanswered issues, especially on safety and efficacy of EVT in specific patient subgroups. Future plans This collaborative effort aims at addressing clinically important questions on safety and efficacy of EVT in conditions not covered by RCTs. The TRISP registry generated substantial novel data supporting stroke physicians in their daily decision making considering IVT candidate patients. While providing observational data on EVT in daily clinical practice, our future findings may likewise be hypothesis generating for future research as well as for quality improvement (on EVT). The collaboration welcomes participation of further centres willing to fulfill the commitment and the outlined requirements. © 2021 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Introduction: After positive findings in clinical trials the time window for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for patients with an acute ischemic stroke has been expanded up to 24 h from symptom onset or last seen well (LSW). We aimed to compare EVT patients’ characteristics and outcomes in the early versus extended time window and to compare outcomes with the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trial results. Patients and methods: Consecutive EVT patients from 16 mostly European comprehensive stroke centers from the EVA-TRISP cohort were included. We compared rates of 90-day good functional outcomes (Modified Rankin Scale 0–2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality between patients treated in the early (<6 h after onset or LSW) versus extended (6–24 h after onset or LSW) time windows. Results: We included 9313 patients, of which 6876 were treated in the early and 2437 in the extended time window. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at presentation was lower in patients treated in the extended time window (median 13 [IQR 7–18] vs 15 [IQR 9–19], p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with good functional outcome was slightly lower in the extended time window (37.4% vs 42.2%, p < 0.001). However, rates of successful recanalization, sICH, and mortality were similar. Good functional outcome rates after EVT were slightly lower for patients in the extended window in the EVA-TRISP cohort as compared to DAWN and DEFUSE 3. Discussion and conclusion: According to this large multicenter cohort study reflecting daily clinical practice, EVT use in the extended time window appears safe and effective. © European Stroke Organisation 2024.

Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) >4.5–9 hours after stroke onset, and the relevance of advanced neuroimaging for patient selection. Methods: Prospective multicenter cohort study from the ThRombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP) collaboration. Outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, poor 3-month functional outcome (modified Rankin scale 3–6) and mortality. We compared: (i) IVT >4.5–9 hours versus 0–4.5 hours after stroke onset and (ii) within the >4.5–9 hours group baseline advanced neuroimaging (computed tomography perfusion, magnetic resonance perfusion or magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) versus non-advanced neuroimaging. Results: Of 15,827 patients, 663 (4.2%) received IVT >4.5–9 hours and 15,164 (95.8%) within 4.5 hours after stroke onset. The main baseline characteristics were evenly distributed between both groups. Time of stroke onset was known in 74.9% of patients treated between >4.5 and 9 hours. Using propensity score weighted binary logistic regression analysis (onset-to-treatment time >4.5–9 hours vs onset-to-treatment time 0–4.5 hours), the probability of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ORadjusted 0.80, 95% CI 0.53–1.17), poor functional outcome (ORadjusted 1.01, 95% CI 0.83–1.22), and mortality (ORadjusted 0.80, 95% CI 0.61–1.04) did not differ significantly between both groups. In patients treated between >4.5 and 9 hours, the use of advanced neuroimaging was associated with a 50% lower mortality compared with non-advanced imaging only (9.9% vs 19.7%; ORadjusted 0.51, 95% CI 0.33–0.79). Interpretation: This study showed no evidence in difference of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, poor outcome, and mortality in selected stroke patients treated with IVT between >4.5 and 9 hours after stroke onset compared with those treated within 4.5 hours. Advanced neuroimaging for patient selection was associated with lower mortality. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:309–320. © 2023 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.

Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) >4.5–9 hours after stroke onset, and the relevance of advanced neuroimaging for patient selection. Methods: Prospective multicenter cohort study from the ThRombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP) collaboration. Outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, poor 3-month functional outcome (modified Rankin scale 3–6) and mortality. We compared: (i) IVT >4.5–9 hours versus 0–4.5 hours after stroke onset and (ii) within the >4.5–9 hours group baseline advanced neuroimaging (computed tomography perfusion, magnetic resonance perfusion or magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) versus non-advanced neuroimaging. Results: Of 15,827 patients, 663 (4.2%) received IVT >4.5–9 hours and 15,164 (95.8%) within 4.5 hours after stroke onset. The main baseline characteristics were evenly distributed between both groups. Time of stroke onset was known in 74.9% of patients treated between >4.5 and 9 hours. Using propensity score weighted binary logistic regression analysis (onset-to-treatment time >4.5–9 hours vs onset-to-treatment time 0–4.5 hours), the probability of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ORadjusted 0.80, 95% CI 0.53–1.17), poor functional outcome (ORadjusted 1.01, 95% CI 0.83–1.22), and mortality (ORadjusted 0.80, 95% CI 0.61–1.04) did not differ significantly between both groups. In patients treated between >4.5 and 9 hours, the use of advanced neuroimaging was associated with a 50% lower mortality compared with non-advanced imaging only (9.9% vs 19.7%; ORadjusted 0.51, 95% CI 0.33–0.79). Interpretation: This study showed no evidence in difference of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, poor outcome, and mortality in selected stroke patients treated with IVT between >4.5 and 9 hours after stroke onset compared with those treated within 4.5 hours. Advanced neuroimaging for patient selection was associated with lower mortality. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:309–320. © 2023 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.

Objective To study the effect of platelet count (PC) on bleeding risk and outcome in stroke patients treatedwith IV thrombolysis (IVT) and to explore whether withholding IVT in PC < 100 ×times; 109/L is supported. Methods In this prospective multicenter, IVT register-based study, we compared PC with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH; Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study [ECASS II] criteria), poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 3-6), andmortality at 3 months. PC was used as a continuous and categorical variable distinguishing thrombocytopenia (<150 × 109/L), thrombocytosis (>450 × 109/L), and normal PC (150-450 × 109/L [reference group]). Moreover, PC< 100× 109/L was compared to PC = 100 × 109/L.Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from the logistic regression models were calculated. Results Among 7,533 IVT-treated stroke patients, 6,830 (90.7%) had normal PC, 595 (7.9%) had thrombocytopenia, and 108 (1.4%) had thrombocytosis. Decreasing PC (every 10 × 109/L) was associated with increasing risk of sICH (ORadjusted 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05) but decreasing risk of poor outcome (ORadjusted 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99) and mortality (ORadjusted 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.99). The risk of sICH was higher in patients with thrombocytopenic than in patients with normal PC (ORadjusted 1.73, 95% CI 1.24-2.43). However, the risk of poor outcome (ORadjusted 0.89, 95% CI 0.39-1.97) and mortality (ORadjusted 1.09, 95% CI 0.83-1.44) did not differ significantly. Thrombocytosis was associated with mortality (ORadjusted 2.02, 95% CI 1.21-3.37). Fortyfour (0.3%) patients had PC < 100 × 109/L. Their risks of sICH (ORunadjusted 1.56, 95% CI 0.48-5.07), poor outcome (ORadjusted 1.63, 95% CI 0.82-3.24), and mortality (ORadjusted 1.38, 95% CI 0.64-2.98) did not differ significantly from those of patients with PC = 100 × 109/L. Conclusion Lower PC was associated with increased risk of sICH, while higher PC indicated increased mortality. Our data suggest that PC modifies outcome and complications in individual patients, while withholding IVT in all patients with PC < 100 × 109/L is challenged. Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Neurology.

Importance: International guidelines recommend avoiding intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with ischemic stroke who have a recent intake of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Objective: To determine the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) associated with use of IVT in patients with recent DOAC ingestion. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 64 primary and comprehensive stroke centers across Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Consecutive adult patients with ischemic stroke who received IVT (both with and without thrombectomy) were included. Patients whose last known DOAC ingestion was more than 48 hours before stroke onset were excluded. A total of 832 patients with recent DOAC use were compared with 32375 controls without recent DOAC use. Data were collected from January 2008 to December 2021. Exposures: Prior DOAC therapy (confirmed last ingestion within 48 hours prior to IVT) compared with no prior oral anticoagulation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was sICH within 36 hours after IVT, defined as worsening of at least 4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and attributed to radiologically evident intracranial hemorrhage. Outcomes were compared according to different selection strategies (DOAC-level measurements, DOAC reversal treatment, IVT with neither DOAC-level measurement nor idarucizumab). The association of sICH with DOAC plasma levels and very recent ingestions was explored in sensitivity analyses. Results: Of 33207 included patients, 14458 (43.5%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 73 (62-80) years. The median (IQR) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 9 (5-16). Of the 832 patients taking DOAC, 252 (30.3%) received DOAC reversal before IVT (all idarucizumab), 225 (27.0%) had DOAC-level measurements, and 355 (42.7%) received IVT without measuring DOAC plasma levels or reversal treatment. The unadjusted rate of sICH was 2.5% (95% CI, 1.6-3.8) in patients taking DOACs compared with 4.1% (95% CI, 3.9-4.4) in control patients using no anticoagulants. Recent DOAC ingestion was associated with lower odds of sICH after IVT compared with no anticoagulation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92). This finding was consistent among the different selection strategies and in sensitivity analyses of patients with detectable plasma levels or very recent ingestion. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, there was insufficient evidence of excess harm associated with off-label IVT in selected patients after ischemic stroke with recent DOAC ingestion.. © 2023 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

(Figure presented.) © European Stroke Organisation 2024.; Background and aims: Previous observational data indicate that young adults treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke have more favorable outcomes and less complications when compared to older adults. Given the limited data on this topic, we aimed to provide more evidence on clinical outcomes and safety in such patients, using a large international thrombolysis registry. Methods: In this prospective multicenter study, we used data from the Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP) registry from 1998 to 2020. Patients who received endovascular treatment (EVT), as only treatment or in addition to IVT, were not included in this cohort. Using multivariable regression models, we compared thrombolysed young patients aged 18–49 years with those aged ⩾50 years with regards to the following outcomes: favorable outcome in stroke survivors (modified Rankin Scale ⩽2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) according to European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II (ECASS II) criteria, and three-months all-cause death. Results: Of the 16,651 IVT treated patients, 1346 (8.1%) were 18–49 years. Young adults in TRISP were more often male (59.6% vs 54.0%), had a lower median NIHSS score on admission, 7 (4–13) versus 8 (5–15), and had less cardiovascular risk factors except for smoking (42.0% vs 19.0%) when compared to older patients. When compared to thrombolysed patients aged ⩾50 years, a favorable functional outcome was more likely in young adults: 81.9% versus 56.4%, aOR 2.30 (1.80–2.95), whilst sICH 1.6% versus 4.6%, aOR 0.45 (0.23–0.90) and death 2.3% versus 14.2%, aOR 0.21 (0.11–0.39) were less likely. Conclusions: Intravenous thrombolysis in young adults is independently associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes and lower rates of complications. © European Stroke Organisation 2024.

Objective: To investigate the association of renal impairment on functional outcome and complications in stroke patients treated with IV thrombolysis (IVT). Methods: In this observational study, we compared the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with poor 3-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores 3-6), death, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) based on the criteria of the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II trial. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Patients without IVT treatment served as a comparison group. Results: Among 4,780 IVT-treated patients, 1,217 (25.5%) had a low GFR (,60mL/min/1.73m2). A GFR decrease by 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 increased the risk of poor outcome (OR [95% CI]): (ORunadjusted 1.20 [1.17-1.24]; OR adjusted 1.05 [1.01-1.09]), death (ORunadjusted 1.33 [1.28-1.38]; ORadjusted 1.18 [1.11-1.249]), and sICH (OR unadjusted 1.15 [1.01-1.22]; ORadjusted 1.11 [1.04-1.20]). Low GFR was independently associated with poor 3-month outcome (OR adjusted 1.32 [1.10-1.58]), death (ORadjusted 1.73 [1.39-2.14]), and sICH (ORadjusted 1.64 [1.21-2.23]) compared with normal GFR (60-120 mL/min/1.73 m2). Low GFR (ORadjusted 1.64 [1.21-2.23]) and stroke severity (ORadjusted 1.05 [1.03-1.07]) independently determined sICH. Compared with patients who did not receive IVT, treatment with IVT in patients with low GFR was associated with poor outcome (ORadjusted 1.79 [1.41-2.25]), and with favorable outcome in those with normal GFR (ORadjusted 0.77 [0.63-0.94]). Conclusion: Renal function significantly modified outcome and complication rates in IVT-treated stroke patients. Lower GFR might be a better risk indicator for sICH than age. A decrease of GFR by 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 seems to have a similar impact on the risk of death or sICH as a 1-pointhigher NIH Stroke Scale score measuring stroke severity. © 2013 American Academy of Neurology.

Objective There are no data regarding long-term medication persistence in stroke survivors treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), which is one of the most important determinants of treatment success. Our objective was to determine long-term medication persistence in stroke patients treated with IVT. Methods This retrospective observational study included 203 IVT-treated and 197 non-IVT treated patients with acute ischemic strokes (IS) admitted to the Stroke Unit between January 2007 and January 2013. Results During a median follow-up period of 3 years (range 1-7 years), 56 (21.6%) patients in the IVT-group and 62 (23.9%) patients in the non-IVT-group died. There was a higher medication persistence for all secondary stroke prevention medications (anti-thrombotic agents, anti-hypertensive drugs, statins and hypoglycemic drugs) in the IVT-group compared to the non-IVT group (88.7% vs. 69.0%; OR = 3.68, 95% CI = 2.17-6.23). After adjusting for baseline characteristics and possible confounders IVT was the independent predictor of medication persistence (OR = 2.93, 95% CI = 1.48-5.81, p = 0.002). Higher medication persistence was observed in patients with favorable long-term functional outcome, both in the IVT-group (OR = 4.37, 95% CI = 1.83-10.40, p < 0.001) and the non-IVT-group (OR = 3.46, 95% CI = 1.84-6.52, p < 0.001). Conclusion Medication persistence was higher among IVT-treated patients compared to non-IVT-treated patients. The higher rate of non- medication persistence was recorded among patients with more pronounced disabilities after stroke. © 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Background and Purpose It remains unclear if intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator has an impact on the survival and maintenance of a favorable effect on functional recovery over a long follow-up period. The aim of this study was to assess whether or not IVT treatment has a favorable effect on functional recovery and survival less than 1 year after a stroke. Methods This matched cohort study included 259 patients with acute ischemic stroke (IS) who were treated with IVT and standard care and 259 patients treated with standard care alone in the stroke unit between February 2006 and January 2013. Results After a median follow-up period of 3 years (range, 1-7 years), survival did not differ significantly between the groups; specifically, 56 patients (21.6%) in the thrombolysed group died versus 62 patients (23.94%) in the nonthrombolysed group (log-rank, .240, P = .624). Based on a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, older age (>70 years), stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥ 15), diabetes mellitus, and a history of atrial fibrillation were independent predictors of long-term mortality after stroke. After the follow-up period, 144 patients (55.6%) in the IVT-treated group versus 112 patients (43.2%) in the control group had an excellent outcome, with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-2.32). Based on a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, an excellent 3-month functional recovery was a strong predictor of favorable outcome (HR = 11.27, 95% CI = 6.45-19.63). Conclusion The results suggest that IVT for acute IS has a favorable effect on functional recovery more than 1 year after stroke. © 2017 National Stroke Association

The question of whether i.v. rt-PA is beneficial in patients with ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unresolved. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of patients with AF who received i.v. rt-PA for stroke in the registries of Lille (France) and Belgrade (Serbia). End-points were poor outcome [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6], and symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation (sHT) according to ECASS3. Of 734 consecutive patients, 155 (21.2 %) had AF. The unadjusted comparison found patients with AF to be 12 years older, more likely to be women, to have hypertension, and baseline INR > 1.2, and less likely to be smokers. They had higher baseline NIHSS scores, diastolic blood pressure, and serum glucose concentrations, and lower platelet counts. They did not differ for sHT (5.8 vs. 5.5 %; p = 0.893), but they more frequently had poor outcomes (52.3 vs. 35.2 %; p < 0.001) and death (21.9 vs. 9.0 %; p < 0.001). The only independent predictor of sHT was baseline NIHSS ( adjOR 1.05 per 1 point increase; 95 % CI 1.01-1.10). Independent variables associated with poor outcome were age (adjOR 1.04 for 1 year increase; 95 % CI 1.03-1.06), baseline NIHSS (adjOR 1.17 per 1 point increase; 95 % CI 1.13-1.21), and sHT (adjOR 47.6; 95 % CI 10.2-250) but not AF. In patients treated with i.v. rt-PA for cerebral ischaemia, those with AF have worse outcomes because they are older and have more severe strokes at admission. This result suggests that we should focus on prevention and research of more aggressive strategies at the acute stage. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

The question of whether i.v. rt-PA is beneficial in patients with ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unresolved. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of patients with AF who received i.v. rt-PA for stroke in the registries of Lille (France) and Belgrade (Serbia). End-points were poor outcome [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6], and symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation (sHT) according to ECASS3. Of 734 consecutive patients, 155 (21.2 %) had AF. The unadjusted comparison found patients with AF to be 12 years older, more likely to be women, to have hypertension, and baseline INR > 1.2, and less likely to be smokers. They had higher baseline NIHSS scores, diastolic blood pressure, and serum glucose concentrations, and lower platelet counts. They did not differ for sHT (5.8 vs. 5.5 %; p = 0.893), but they more frequently had poor outcomes (52.3 vs. 35.2 %; p < 0.001) and death (21.9 vs. 9.0 %; p < 0.001). The only independent predictor of sHT was baseline NIHSS ( adjOR 1.05 per 1 point increase; 95 % CI 1.01-1.10). Independent variables associated with poor outcome were age (adjOR 1.04 for 1 year increase; 95 % CI 1.03-1.06), baseline NIHSS (adjOR 1.17 per 1 point increase; 95 % CI 1.13-1.21), and sHT (adjOR 47.6; 95 % CI 10.2-250) but not AF. In patients treated with i.v. rt-PA for cerebral ischaemia, those with AF have worse outcomes because they are older and have more severe strokes at admission. This result suggests that we should focus on prevention and research of more aggressive strategies at the acute stage. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

[No abstract available]

[No abstract available]

Background and Purpose This study aimed to investigate the effect of endovascular treatment (EVT, with or without intravenous thrombolysis [IVT]) versus IVT alone on outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) attributable to cervical artery dissection (CeAD). Methods This multinational cohort study was conducted based on prospectively collected data from the EVA-TRISP (EndoVAscular treatment and ThRombolysis for Ischemic Stroke Patients) collaboration. Consecutive patients (2015–2019) with AIS-LVO attributable to CeAD treated with EVT and/or IVT were included. Primary outcome measures were (1) favorable 3-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) and (2) complete recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale 2b/3). Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (OR [95% CI]) from logistic regression models were calculated (unadjusted, adjusted). Secondary analyses were performed in the patients with LVO in the anterior circulation (LVOant) including propensity score matching. Results Among 290 patients, 222 (76.6%) had EVT and 68 (23.4%) IVT alone. EVT-treated patients had more severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, median [interquartile range]: 14 [10–19] vs. 4 [2–7], P<0.001). The frequency of favorable 3-month outcome did not differ significantly between both groups (EVT: 64.0% vs. IVT: 86.8%; ORadjusted 0.56 [0.24–1.32]). EVT was associated with higher rates of recanalization (80.5% vs. 40.7%; ORadjusted 8.85 [4.28–18.29]) compared to IVT. All secondary analyses showed higher recanalization rates in the EVT-group, which however never translated into better functional outcome rates compared to the IVT-group. Conclusion We observed no signal of superiority of EVT over IVT regarding functional outcome in CeAD-patients with AIS and LVO despite higher rates of complete recanalization with EVT. Whether pathophysiological CeAD-characteristics or their younger age might explain this observation deserves further research. © 2023 Korean Stroke Society.