Browsing by Author "Otašević, P. (55927970400)"

Objectives: While partial left ventriculectomy (PLV) may improve functional status, the duration and determinants of this improvement are poorly known. This study sought to assess the relationship between left ventricular (LV) shape and function and functional status in late survivors after PLV for non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Methods: We assessed the relations between LV shape and function and functional status in 17 consecutive patients who survived >12 months after PLV for non-ischemic DCM. Invasive diagnostic studies were performed before, early after, at mid-term after, and late after PLV. According to their functional status after >12 months of follow-up, patients were divided into responders (n=10) or non-responders (n=7). Results: After PLV, the LV systolic major-to-minor axis ratio was higher in responders at early, mid-, and late follow-up (P=0.003, P=0.008 and P=0.04, respectively). LV circumferential end-diastolic stress decreased early after PLV, but increased afterwards in non-responders only (P=0.049). LV ejection fraction was similar in the two groups at baseline, and at early and mid-follow-up, but was lower in non-responders at late follow-up (P=0.006). However, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, and LV end-systolic circumferential stress showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusions: It appears that poor functional capacity in late post-PLV survivors is related to postoperative LV geometry. Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V.

Aims: No study has directly compared different histomorphometric methods of quantification of myocardial fibrosis. Therefore we compared the results of semiquantitative, point-counting and computer-based methods in the assessement of myocardial fibrosis in a consecutive series of endomyocardial biopsy samples from patients with heart muscle disease. Methods and results: Histological samples (at least three per patient) were obtained by endomyocardial biopsy from 11 patients with focal myocarditis and from 24 ambulatory patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, or during surgery in 10 patients who underwent partial left ventriculectomy. Samples were cut and stained with Masson-trichrome for better contrast. From each sample, a representative field was digitized, and the amount of fibrosis was assessed by semiquantitative scoring, by point-counting, and by computer-based software. Semiquantitative scoring correlated with both point-counting (Spearman's r = 0.69, P < 0.0001) and computer-based (Spearman's r = 0.83, P < 0.0001) methods. There was also a good correlation between point-counting and computer-based methods (r = 0.71, P < 0.0001). However, when compared with the point-counting method, the computer-based method overestimated percent fibrosis by 3.0 ± 6.7% (P = 0.004). This overestimation correlated with the mean percent fibrosis (r = 0.38, P = 0.014). Conclusions: Our data show good correlations between the three methods of myocardial fibrosis assessment. However, systematic differences between them emphasize that this should be taken into consideration when comparing results of the studies using different methods of fibrosis assessment.