Browsing by Author "Nesic, Zorica (6701752615)"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Characteristics of patients dying from acute viral hepatitis in Serbia(2011) ;Svirtlih, Neda (6603664119) ;Delic, Dragan (55886413300) ;Simonovic, Jasmina (6507086058) ;Dokic, Ljubisa (6602526803) ;Gvozdenovic, Eleonora (14832449700) ;Dulovic, Olga (6602485522) ;Nesic, Zorica (6701752615)Boricic, Ivan (6603959716)Background/aims: Background/aims: Acute viral hepatitis is complicated rarely with severe liver failure due to many factors associated with the etiology, patient age, and time of development of hepatic encephalopathy, etc. The aim of this study was to identify some of the clinical and laboratory features associated with a fatal outcome in patients dying from acute viral hepatitis in Serbia. Methods: Clinical and laboratory data from 47 patients hospitalized from January 1989 - December 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. Serological tests for hepatitis A, B, C, D, and E viruses, herpes simplex viruses, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus were done. Histological features were assessed from 35 liver tissues. The electronic base, SPSS for Windows (version 11.0), was used for statistical analysis. Results: The majority of the patients had alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >20x the normal value, serum bilirubin >300μmol/L, prothrombin time >25 seconds (s), and white blood cell count >12 × 10 9/L. Regression analysis revealed activity of alanine aminotransferase >20x the normal value to be associated with fulminant (p=0.015) and serum bilirubin concentration with subfulminant hepatitis (p=0.008). Hepatitis B virus was the most commonly detected virus (70%). Massive hepatocyte necrosis vs. sub-massive with bridging necrosis were found to be independent of clinical presentation. Conclusions: Hepatitis B virus infection, severe impairment of liver function tests, and confluent hepatocyte necrosis and infection characterize patients dying from acute viral hepatitis in Serbia. High activity of alanine aminotransferase reflects rapid and extensive acute viral liver injury, while deep jaundice is more common in a protracted course of the disease. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Older age at the time of liver biopsy is the important risk factor for advanced fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C(2007) ;Svirtlih, Neda (6603664119) ;Jevtovic, Djordje (55410443900) ;Simonovic, Jasmina (6507086058) ;Delic, Dragan (55886413300) ;Dokic, Ljubisa (6602526803) ;Gvozdenovic, Eleonora (14832449700) ;Boricic, Ivan (6603959716) ;Nesic, Zorica (6701752615) ;Neskovic, Gorana (6508293958)Urban, Vladimir (57219892421)Background/Aims: Progression of chronic hepatitis C depends on the host and viral characteristics, duration of infection, co-infection with other viruses, etc. In this study, some of demographic, epidemiological and viral data as risk factors for a degree of liver fibrosis were evaluated. Methodology: A total of 144 patients was investigated (89 males, ages from 16-65 years) classified into two groups, with fibrosis scores 0-3 and 4-6, using the Ishak scoring system. Significant variables were entered into univariate logistic regression model and further multivariate analysis was performed. Results: There were 64% and 36% of patients with fibrosis scores 0-3 and 4-6, respectively. Gender, moderate to heavy alcohol abuse and high viral RNA were equally distributed between both groups. In univariate analysis, the age older than 40, history of intravenous drug abuse, and the genotype 1b were independently associated with different fibrosis scores. Multivariate regression analysis revealed ages older than 40 as the positive (p<0.001), and younger than 40 as the negative predictive factors for fibrosis scores 4-6 and 0-3 (p<0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Our results indicate the age over 40 at the time of liver biopsy as the important risk factor for advanced liver disease in chronic hepatitis C according to fibrosis scores. © H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing S.A. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Oral teicoplanin for successful treatment of severe refractory clostridium difficile infection(2015) ;Popovic, Natasa (57214680239) ;Korac, Milos (10040016700) ;Nesic, Zorica (6701752615) ;Milosevic, Branko (57204639427) ;Urosevic, Aleksandar (58075718100) ;Jevtovic, Djordje (55410443900) ;Pelemis, Mijomir (6507978433) ;Delic, Dragan (55886413300) ;Prostran, Milica (7004009031)Milosevic, Ivana (58456808200)Introduction: Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhoea. There is no defined protocol for treating severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) refractory to vancomycin or vancomycin and metronidazole combination therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of clinical cure, time to resolution of diarrhoea and recurrence rate in patients with severe refractory CDI treated with oral teicoplanin. Methodology: A one-year prospective study was carried out in the Clinic for Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Clinical Center Serbia. Patients with severe and complicated CDI who failed to respond to oral vancomycin and intravenous metronidazole combination therapy were enrolled. They were given oral teicoplanin 100 mg bi-daily. Patients were followed for recurrence for eight weeks. Results: Nine patients with a mean age of 70.8±9.4 years were analyzed. All patients had pseudomembranous colitis, and five had complicated disease. In four patients intracolonic delivery of vancomycin was also performed in addition to oral vancomycin and intravenous metronidazole prior to initiating teicoplanin, but without improvement. After teicoplanin initiation all patients achieved clinical cure. The mean time to resolution of diarrhoea after teicoplanin introduction was 6.3±4.5 days. There was no statistically significant difference in time to resolution of diarrhoea according to initial leucocyte count, age over 65 years, the presence of ileus, complicated disease and the use of concomitant antibiotic therapy (p = 0.652, 0,652, 0.374, 0.374, and 0,548, respectively). None of the patients experienced recurrence. Conclusions: Oral teicoplanin might be a potential treatment for severe and complicated refractory CDI, but further studies are required. © 2015 Popovic et al. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Oral teicoplanin for successful treatment of severe refractory clostridium difficile infection(2015) ;Popovic, Natasa (57214680239) ;Korac, Milos (10040016700) ;Nesic, Zorica (6701752615) ;Milosevic, Branko (57204639427) ;Urosevic, Aleksandar (58075718100) ;Jevtovic, Djordje (55410443900) ;Pelemis, Mijomir (6507978433) ;Delic, Dragan (55886413300) ;Prostran, Milica (7004009031)Milosevic, Ivana (58456808200)Introduction: Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhoea. There is no defined protocol for treating severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) refractory to vancomycin or vancomycin and metronidazole combination therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of clinical cure, time to resolution of diarrhoea and recurrence rate in patients with severe refractory CDI treated with oral teicoplanin. Methodology: A one-year prospective study was carried out in the Clinic for Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Clinical Center Serbia. Patients with severe and complicated CDI who failed to respond to oral vancomycin and intravenous metronidazole combination therapy were enrolled. They were given oral teicoplanin 100 mg bi-daily. Patients were followed for recurrence for eight weeks. Results: Nine patients with a mean age of 70.8±9.4 years were analyzed. All patients had pseudomembranous colitis, and five had complicated disease. In four patients intracolonic delivery of vancomycin was also performed in addition to oral vancomycin and intravenous metronidazole prior to initiating teicoplanin, but without improvement. After teicoplanin initiation all patients achieved clinical cure. The mean time to resolution of diarrhoea after teicoplanin introduction was 6.3±4.5 days. There was no statistically significant difference in time to resolution of diarrhoea according to initial leucocyte count, age over 65 years, the presence of ileus, complicated disease and the use of concomitant antibiotic therapy (p = 0.652, 0,652, 0.374, 0.374, and 0,548, respectively). None of the patients experienced recurrence. Conclusions: Oral teicoplanin might be a potential treatment for severe and complicated refractory CDI, but further studies are required. © 2015 Popovic et al. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Oral teicoplanin versus oral vancomycin for the treatment of severe Clostridium difficile infection: a prospective observational study(2018) ;Popovic, Natasa (57214680239) ;Korac, Milos (10040016700) ;Nesic, Zorica (6701752615) ;Milosevic, Branko (57204639427) ;Urosevic, Aleksandar (58075718100) ;Jevtovic, Djordje (55410443900) ;Mitrovic, Nikola (55110096400) ;Markovic, Aleksandar (57198206234) ;Jordovic, Jelena (57190498051) ;Katanic, Natasa (57190964860) ;Barac, Aleksandra (55550748700)Milosevic, Ivana (58456808200)The aim of this study was to compare clinical cure rate, recurrence rate and time to resolution of diarrhea in patients with severe and severe-complicated Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treated with teicoplanin or vancomycin. This two-year prospective observational study included patients with first episode or first recurrence of CDI who had severe or severe-complicated CDI and were treated with teicoplanin or vancomycin. Primary outcomes of interest were clinical cure rate at discharge and recurrence rate after eight weeks follow up, and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and time to resolution of diarrhea. Among 287 study patients, 107 were treated with teicoplanin and 180 with vancomycin. The mean age of patients was 73.5 ± 10.6 years. One hundred eighty six patients (64.8%) had prior CDI episode. Severe complicated disease was detected in 23/107 (21.5%) and 42/180 (23.3%) patients treated with teicoplanin and vancomycin, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in time to resolution of diarrhea between two treatment arms (6.0 ± 3.4 vs 6.2 ± 3.1 days, p = 0.672). Treatment with teicoplanin resulted in significantly higher clinical cure rate compared to vancomycin [90.7% vs 79.4%, p = 0.013, odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) 2.51 (1.19–5.28)]. Recurrence rates were significantly lower in patients treated with teicoplanin [9/97 (9.3%) vs 49/143 (34.3%), p < 0.001, OR (95%CI) 0.20 (0.09–0.42)]. There was no statistically significant difference in overall mortality rate. Teicoplanin might be a good treatment option for patients with severe CDI. Patients treated with teicoplanin experienced remarkably lower recurrence rates compared to vancomycin-treated patients. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
