Browsing by Author "Nežić, Duško (6701705512)"

Background/Aim. A protection of heart and other organs from ischemic-reperfusion injuries can be provided by remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) by brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion in distant tissues. The aim of this study was to assess effects of RIPC on early outcomes in patients underwent coronary bypass surgery (CABG) following acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST segment elevation (NSTEMI ACS). Methods. This trial included 42 patients randomized into two groups: the group 1 received RIPC and the group 2 was without RIPC (control group). Pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters were compared but primary endpoint was myocardial injury reflected as value of troponin I measured preoperatively and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h postoperatively. The secondary endpoints were hemodynamic parameters, blood loss, intensive care unit stay, mortality etc. Results. The groups 1 and 2 were similar in preoperative characteristics including age, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, EuroSCORE II, left ventricular ejection fraction. The only significant difference between groups was for triple vessel coronary disease with dominance in the RIPC group [20 (100%) vs. 17 (77.3%), p = 0.049]. Cardiopulmonary bypass time [mean (± standard deviation): 83.0 (22.9) vs. 67.0 (17.4) minutes, p = 0.015], cross clamp time [57.9 (15.4) vs. 44.3 (14.3) minutes, p = 0.005] and number of conduits [median (25–75th percentile): 23.5(3–4) vs. 3(2–3), p = 0.002] were different. Other intra- and postoperative variables did not differ between groups. There were no differences in C reactive protein levels and postoperative hemodynamic parameters. Average troponin values in all time points revealed no significant differences between groups (p0h = 0.740, p1h = 0.212, p6h = 0.504, p12h = 0.597, p24h = 0.562, p48h = 0.465 and p72h = 0.715, respectively). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in adverse events, hospital stay and mortality between groups. Conclusion. Treatment with RIPC during CABG following NSTEMI ACS did not provide better myocardial protection and hemodynamics characteristics but further larger randomized studies are needed t. prove its real value. © 2020 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.

OBJECTIVES: Concomitant carotid and cardiac surgery carries an increased perioperative morbidity and mortality risk. Whether the hybrid procedure of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and coronary bypass surgery decreases the risk of stroke and other complications is still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess early outcomes after simultaneous hybrid CAS and coronary bypass grafting versus open concomitant carotid and coronary bypass surgery. METHODS: We included 20 patients in this study. According to the protocol, all the patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (10 patients) with hybrid CAS and coronary bypass surgery and Group 2 (10 patients) with concomitant carotid and coronary surgery. Different preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables were compared. The primary end point was combined incidence of stroke and death 30 days after surgery or during initial hospitalization. The secondary end points were myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, blood loss and need for blood transfusion and duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay. RESULTS: Groups 1 and 2 were similar in preoperative characteristics including age (65.3 ± 6.8 vs 70.7 ± 7.0, P = 0.191) New York Heart Association class (2.3 ± 0.5 vs 1.8 ± 0.7, P = 0.218), EuroSCORE (2.8 ± 2.0 vs 3.6 ± 2.3, P = 0.547), the degree of carotid stenosis (79 ± 12 vs 87 ± 13%, P = 0.224) and average left ventricular ejection fraction (44.3 ± 12.4 vs 43.4 ± 13.3%, P = 0.896). Also, the groups did not differ in intraoperative variables with an exception of extracorporeal circulation time (65.7 ± 14.1 vs 90.0 + 17.4 min, P = 0.023), which was significantly shorter in Group 1. Although rare, and without significant difference, primary end point occurred only in Group 2 (1 stroke and 1 death, 20%). There was no difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation, need for transfusion and duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by a small sample size, our results show that the hybrid procedure of carotid stenting and coronary surgery might be a good therapeutic option but further extended studies are needed to assess its real value. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.