Browsing by Author "Nadrljanski, M. (24280702200)"

Objective: The objective of this study was an analysis of interobserver variability and positive predictive value (PPV) for BI-RADS categories requiring pathohistological evaluation: 4A, 4B, 4C, and 5. Material and Methods: Interobserver variability for each of descriptors as well as PPV for final BI-RADS categories requiring pathohistological evaluation was measured in a retrospective study which included 30 ultrasonographic reports, with pathohistological verification, randomly selected from ultrasonographic reports from Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia where about 1,100 breast cancers are verified every year. Ten observers, seven gynecologists, and three radiologists, independently rated each ultrasonographic report according to the fourth edition of BI-RADS atlas. Interobserver variability was measured with k coefficient. Results: There was most conformity for a category of orientation (k = 0.79). Substantial degree of conformity was also present for both boundary (k = 0.71) and shape (k = 0.65) categories. Moderate degree of conformity was achieved for posterior features (k = 0.54) and margins (k =0.41) descriptors, while there was poor conformity in echogenicity (k = 0.38). In case of a final score, common conformity for all BI-RADS 4A, 4B, 4C, and 5 categories was (k = 0.51); it was the greatest for category 5 (k = 0.50), and it was less for categories 4C (k = 0.37), 4B (k = 0.32), and 4A (k = 0.29). Conclusions: Interobserver conformity for ultrasonographic descriptors and final evaluation of BI-RADS 4A, 4B, 4C, and 5 categories is good. PPV implies that not only division into categories 4 and 5, but also classification into categories 4 and subcategories 4A, 4B, and 4C are justified and clinically applicable.

Background: Adenocarcinoma, accounts for up to 14% of all vaginal cancer. In young patients, common histological feature is clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCA) while mesonephric adenocarcinoma (MA) is very rare. The authors report two patients in their early twenties with unilateral renal agenesis and vaginal adenocarcinoma not exposed to diethylstilbestrol (DES). Cases: Two patients with vaginal adenocarcinoma were treated, with external beam radiotherapy of pelvis combined with brachytherapy to a radical dose. In 2000, 25-year-old female, was admitted for radiotherapy after incomplete excision of the tumor localized in left vaginal apex and fomix. Histopathology confirmed CCA and classified as clinical Stage II. CT revealed left renal agenesis.The patient is alive and disease-free 15 years after therapy. Vaginal, urethral stenosis, and hydronephrosis occurred and ureteral stent was inserted. In the second patient, 22-year-old, in 2004, after biopsy of bulky tumor of vagina and histology, revealed MA in Stage III and CT scan also confirmed right renal agenesis. Radiotherapy was followed by chemotherapy. After 11 years, patient is disease-free with vaginal stenosis and incipient renal hydronephrosis. Conclusion: Radiotherapy is effective treatment in advance vaginal adenocarcinoma, however, with high morbidity. The authors advise rigorous gynecologic exams in young females with renal agenesis as there may be a risk of malignant changes in vagina. © 2017, S.O.G. Canada Inc. All rights reserved.