Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Mrdović, Igor (10140828000)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Comparison of RISK-PCI, GRACE, TIMI risk scores for prediction of major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndrome
    (2017)
    Jakimov, Tamara (57200247382)
    ;
    Mrdović, Igor (10140828000)
    ;
    Filipović, Branka (22934489100)
    ;
    Zdravković, Marija (24924016800)
    ;
    Djoković, Aleksandra (42661226500)
    ;
    Hinić, Saša (55208518100)
    ;
    Milić, Nataša (7003460927)
    ;
    Filipović, Branislav (56207614900)
    Aim To compare the prognostic performance of three major risk scoring systems including global registry for acute coronary events (GRACE), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI), and prediction of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (RISK-PCI). Methods This single-center retrospective study involved 200 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent invasive diagnostic approach, ie, coronary angiography and myocardial revascularization if appropriate, in the period from January 2014 to July 2014. The GRACE, TIMI, and RISK-PCI risk scores were compared for their predictive ability. The primary endpoint was a composite 30-day major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), which included death, urgent target-vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke, and non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction (REMI). Results The c-statistics of the tested scores for 30-day MACE or area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with confidence intervals (CI) were as follows: RISK-PCI (AUC = 0.94; 95% CI 1.790-4.353), the GRACE score on admission (AUC = 0.73; 95% CI 1.013-1.045), the GRACE score on discharge (AUC = 0.65; 95% CI 0.999-1.033). The RISK-PCI score was the only score that could predict TVR (AUC = 0.91; 95% CI 1.392-2.882). The RISK-PCI scoring system showed an excellent discriminative potential for 30- day death (AUC = 0.96; 95% CI 1.339-3.548) in comparison with the GRACE scores on admission (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI 1.018-1.072) and on discharge (AUC = 0.78; 95% CI 1.000- 1.058). Conclusions In comparison with the GRACE and TIMI scores, RISK-PCI score showed a non-inferior ability to predict 30-day MACE and death in ACS patients. Moreover, RISK-PCI was the only scoring system that could predict recurrent ischemia requiring TVR.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    The impact of the complete atrioventricular block on in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention; [Uticaj kompletnog atrioventrikularnog bloka na intrahospitalni i dugoročni mortalitet bolesnika lečenih primarnom perkutanom koronarnom intervencijom]
    (2023)
    Savić, Lidija (16507811000)
    ;
    Mrdović, Igor (10140828000)
    ;
    Ašanin, Milika (8603366900)
    ;
    Stanković, Sanja (7005216636)
    ;
    Krljanac, Gordana (8947929900)
    Background/Aim. The prognostic impact of complete atrioventricular (AV) block on the long-term prognosis of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been fully determined. The aim of the study was to analyze the incidence and prognostic impact of complete AV block on in-hospital mortality (IHM) and 6-year mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods. The study included 3,044 consecutive STEMI patients. Results. Complete AV block was registered only on admission in 144 (4.73%) patients; 125 (86.8%) patients with complete AV block had inferior infarction. A temporary pacemaker was implanted in 72 (50%) patients with complete AV block. No patient underwent permanent pacemaker implantation. IHM was significantly higher in patients with complete AV block than in patients without complete AV block: 17.9% vs. 3.6%, respectively, p < 0.001. In patients with heart block and inferior infarction, IHM was 13%, whereas IHM was 53% in patients with heart block and anterior infarction. When we analyzed patients discharged alive from the hospital, we also found a significantly higher long-term (6-year) mortality rate in those with complete AV block vs. patients without AV block: 7.8% vs. 3.4%, respectively, p < 0.001. Complete AV block was an independent predictor for IHM and 6-year mortality: IHM [odds ratio (OR) 2.94 95%, confidence interval (CI) 1.23–5.22; 6-year mortality hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95%, CI 1.10–2.37]. When subanalysis was performed in patients with inferior STEMI, complete AV block was an independent predictor of IHM and 6-year mortality, while in patients with anterior STEMI, complete AV block was an independent predictor of IHM. Conclusion. In analyzed STEMI patients, complete AV block was transitory and was registered only on hospital admission. Although transitory, complete AV block remained a strong independent predictor of IHM and long-term mortality. © 2023 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback