Browsing by Author "Milojević, Predrag (6602755452)"

Introduction. Myxoma is the most common primary benign heart tumor. The most frequent location is the left atrium, the chamber of the heart that receives oxygen- rich blood from the lungs. Myxomas usually develop in women, typically between the ages of 40 and 60. Symptoms may occur at any time, but most often they are asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic for a long period of time. Symptoms usually go along with body position, and are related to compression of the heart cavities, embolization and the appearance of general symptoms. The diagnosis of benign tumors of the heart is based on anamnesis, clinical features and findings of the tumor masses by use of non-invasive and invasive imaging methods. Extensive surgical resection of the myxoma is curative with minimal mortality. Long term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up is mandatory. Case report. We reported a case of a 62-year-old male, presented with 15 days of intermittent shortness of breath, dizziness and feeling of heart palpitations and subsequently diagnosed with right atrial myxoma based on transthoracic echocardiography . The patient was emergently operated in our hospital. Long-term followup did not reveal recurrence. Conclusion. Our case was an atypical localisation of right atrial myxoma. Whether the intracardiac mass is benign or malignant, early surgery is obligatory in order to prevent complications. © 2018, Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.

More than 50 years ago, vitamin K antagonists were the only available oral anticoagulants. Since their application involves a number of limitations, it was necessary to develop new oral anticoagulant drugs and introduce them into clinical practice. These drugs have many advantages over vitamin K antagonists, including rapid onset/offset, a small number of interactions with other drugs and food, simplified dosing and predictable pharmacokinetics, eliminating the need for daily laboratory monitoring. In addition, new oral anticoagulant drugs act selectively on a single coagulation factor. Currently, the following drugs are approved for use: direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, direct factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban. Dabigatran etexilate and apixaban are approved for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism in adult patients undergoing elective surgery of total hip or knee replacement, while in addition to these anticoagulants edoxaban is approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. For the treatment and prevention of recurrent deep vein thrombosis dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban and edoxaban are approved. In addition, rivaroxaban is approved for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. © 2017, Serbian Medical Society. All rights reserved.

Background/Aim. A protection of heart and other organs from ischemic-reperfusion injuries can be provided by remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) by brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion in distant tissues. The aim of this study was to assess effects of RIPC on early outcomes in patients underwent coronary bypass surgery (CABG) following acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST segment elevation (NSTEMI ACS). Methods. This trial included 42 patients randomized into two groups: the group 1 received RIPC and the group 2 was without RIPC (control group). Pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters were compared but primary endpoint was myocardial injury reflected as value of troponin I measured preoperatively and 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h postoperatively. The secondary endpoints were hemodynamic parameters, blood loss, intensive care unit stay, mortality etc. Results. The groups 1 and 2 were similar in preoperative characteristics including age, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, EuroSCORE II, left ventricular ejection fraction. The only significant difference between groups was for triple vessel coronary disease with dominance in the RIPC group [20 (100%) vs. 17 (77.3%), p = 0.049]. Cardiopulmonary bypass time [mean (± standard deviation): 83.0 (22.9) vs. 67.0 (17.4) minutes, p = 0.015], cross clamp time [57.9 (15.4) vs. 44.3 (14.3) minutes, p = 0.005] and number of conduits [median (25–75th percentile): 23.5(3–4) vs. 3(2–3), p = 0.002] were different. Other intra- and postoperative variables did not differ between groups. There were no differences in C reactive protein levels and postoperative hemodynamic parameters. Average troponin values in all time points revealed no significant differences between groups (p0h = 0.740, p1h = 0.212, p6h = 0.504, p12h = 0.597, p24h = 0.562, p48h = 0.465 and p72h = 0.715, respectively). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in adverse events, hospital stay and mortality between groups. Conclusion. Treatment with RIPC during CABG following NSTEMI ACS did not provide better myocardial protection and hemodynamics characteristics but further larger randomized studies are needed t. prove its real value. © 2020 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.

OBJECTIVES: Concomitant carotid and cardiac surgery carries an increased perioperative morbidity and mortality risk. Whether the hybrid procedure of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and coronary bypass surgery decreases the risk of stroke and other complications is still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess early outcomes after simultaneous hybrid CAS and coronary bypass grafting versus open concomitant carotid and coronary bypass surgery. METHODS: We included 20 patients in this study. According to the protocol, all the patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (10 patients) with hybrid CAS and coronary bypass surgery and Group 2 (10 patients) with concomitant carotid and coronary surgery. Different preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables were compared. The primary end point was combined incidence of stroke and death 30 days after surgery or during initial hospitalization. The secondary end points were myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, blood loss and need for blood transfusion and duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay. RESULTS: Groups 1 and 2 were similar in preoperative characteristics including age (65.3 ± 6.8 vs 70.7 ± 7.0, P = 0.191) New York Heart Association class (2.3 ± 0.5 vs 1.8 ± 0.7, P = 0.218), EuroSCORE (2.8 ± 2.0 vs 3.6 ± 2.3, P = 0.547), the degree of carotid stenosis (79 ± 12 vs 87 ± 13%, P = 0.224) and average left ventricular ejection fraction (44.3 ± 12.4 vs 43.4 ± 13.3%, P = 0.896). Also, the groups did not differ in intraoperative variables with an exception of extracorporeal circulation time (65.7 ± 14.1 vs 90.0 + 17.4 min, P = 0.023), which was significantly shorter in Group 1. Although rare, and without significant difference, primary end point occurred only in Group 2 (1 stroke and 1 death, 20%). There was no difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation, need for transfusion and duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by a small sample size, our results show that the hybrid procedure of carotid stenting and coronary surgery might be a good therapeutic option but further extended studies are needed to assess its real value. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Introduction. Combined endovascular interventions on carotid and coronary arteries are rare. Stenting of the unprotected coronary left main stem is a high risk procedure. We presented hemodynamically unstable patient with combined carotid artery and left main stem coronary artery stenting. Case report. A 78-year-old female patient was admitted to our institution for right carotid endaterectomy. The patient had 80% stenosis of the right carotid artery and occlusion of the left carotid artery. Coronary angiography revealed 70% ostial left main stenosis, occlusion of the right coronary artery and the left circumflex artery, and 80% stenosis of the left anterior descending artery. Simultaneous carotid artery endaterectomy and coronary artery by-pass grafting were considered. Due to high perioperative risk, surgery was rejected, and the patient was treated endovascularly with stenting of arteries occluded. The procedure was completed without complications and the patient was hemodynamically stabilised. Conclusion. This report illustrates simultaneous coronary and carotid stenting as a successfull lifesaving procedure.