Browsing by Author "Mateos, Maria-Victoria (57223876573)"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Efficacy and safety of melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from the randomized, open-label, phase III LIGHTHOUSE study(2024) ;Pour, Luděk (22938960400) ;Szarejko, Monika (57194336909) ;Bila, Jelena (57208312102) ;Schjesvold, Fredrik H. (24401832100) ;Spicka, Ivan (7003914205) ;Maisnar, Vladimir (6602330795) ;Jurczyszyn, Artur (55909001800) ;Grudeva-Popova, Zhanet (6603616511) ;Hájek, Roman (57225459521) ;Usenko, Ganna (57212446123) ;Thuresson, Marcus (56031795100) ;Norin, Stefan (7801637600) ;Jarefors, Sara (58915852800) ;Bakker, Nicolaas A. (57210988791) ;Richardson, Paul G. (34571744900)Mateos, Maria-Victoria (57223876573)Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies. © 2024 Ferrata Storti Foundation. All rights reserved. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Prevention and management of adverse events during treatment with bispecific antibodies and CAR T cells in multiple myeloma: a consensus report of the European Myeloma Network(2023) ;Ludwig, Heinz (55712017800) ;Terpos, Evangelos (7004049779) ;van de Donk, Niels (6507483849) ;Mateos, Maria-Victoria (57223876573) ;Moreau, Philippe (14527450700) ;Dimopoulos, Melitios-Athanasios (55978800700) ;Delforge, Michel (7006519311) ;Rodriguez-Otero, Paula (23089719200) ;San-Miguel, Jesús (57226622785) ;Yong, Kwee (7102064249) ;Gay, Francesca (16315707000) ;Einsele, Hermann (59114787500) ;Mina, Roberto (55382956600) ;Caers, Jo (12774892000) ;Driessen, Christoph (7004069550) ;Musto, Pellegrino (7103410693) ;Zweegman, Sonja (6701496579) ;Engelhardt, Monika (7102098444) ;Cook, Gordon (24823929200) ;Weisel, Katja (6506544555) ;Broijl, Annemiek (56397016500) ;Beksac, Meral (56924887200) ;Bila, Jelena (57208312102) ;Schjesvold, Fredrik (24401832100) ;Cavo, Michele (7005399620) ;Hajek, Roman (57225459521) ;Touzeau, Cyrille (23010838500) ;Boccadoro, Mario (7005635370)Sonneveld, Pieter (7005618857)T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells) have revolutionised multiple myeloma therapy, but adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinaemia, and infections are common. This Policy Review presents a consensus from the European Myeloma Network on the prevention and management of these adverse events. Recommended measures include premedication, frequent assessing for symptoms and severity of cytokine release syndrome, step-up dosing for several BsAbs and some CAR T-cell therapies; corticosteroids; and tocilizumab in the case of cytokine release syndrome. Other anti-IL-6 drugs, high-dose corticosteroids, and anakinra might be considered in refractory cases. ICANS often arises concomitantly with cytokine release syndrome. Glucocorticosteroids in increasing doses are recommended if needed, as well as anakinra if the response is inadequate, and anticonvulsants if convulsions occur. Preventive measures against infections include antiviral and antibacterial drugs and administration of immunoglobulins. Treatment of infections and other complications is also addressed. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Subcutaneous daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (APOLLO): extended follow up of an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial(2023) ;Dimopoulos, Meletios A (55978800700) ;Terpos, Evangelos (7004049779) ;Boccadoro, Mario (7005635370) ;Delimpasi, Sosana (15762073200) ;Beksac, Meral (56924887200) ;Katodritou, Eirini (12797161700) ;Moreau, Philippe (14527450700) ;Baldini, Luca (7006263525) ;Symeonidis, Argiris (55404339700) ;Bila, Jelena (57208312102) ;Oriol, Albert (57200095915) ;Mateos, Maria-Victoria (57223876573) ;Einsele, Hermann (59114787500) ;Orfanidis, Ioannis (57224171202) ;Kampfenkel, Tobias (36158242500) ;Liu, Weiping (57224368494) ;Wang, Jianping (56873012800) ;Kosh, Michele (56698378700) ;Tran, NamPhuong (55614303100) ;Carson, Robin (57200649206)Sonneveld, Pieter (7005618857)Background: The primary analysis of the APOLLO trial, done after a median follow-up of 16·9 months, showed that daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone significantly improved progression-free survival versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone. Here, we report the final overall survival and updated safety results from APOLLO. Methods: APOLLO was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 48 academic centres and hospitals across 12 countries in Europe, that included adults aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had an ECOG performance status score of 0–2, had received at least one previous line of therapy, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor, had a partial response or better to one or more previous lines of antimyeloma therapy, and were refractory to lenalidomide if they had received only one previous line of therapy. An interactive web-response system was used to randomly assign patients (1:1) to receive daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone or pomalidomide and dexamethasone; patients were stratified by the number of previous lines of therapy and International Staging System disease stage. Oral pomalidomide (4 mg once daily; days 1–21) and dexamethasone (40 mg once daily; days 1, 8, 15, and 22) were given in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Daratumumab (1800 mg subcutaneously or 16 mg/kg intravenously) was administered weekly (cycles 1–2), every 2 weeks (cycles 3–6), and every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival, which has previously been reported, and the pre-planned secondary endpoint of overall survival were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03180736) and is no longer enrolling patients. Findings: Between June 22, 2017, and June 13, 2019, 304 patients were randomly assigned: 151 to the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group and 153 to the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group. The median age was 67 years (IQR 60–72); 143 (47%) patients were female and 161 (53%) were male, and 272 (89%) were White. At a median follow-up of 39·6 months (IQR 37·1–43·7), median overall survival was 34·4 months (95% CI 23·7–40·3) in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group versus 23·7 months (19·6–29·4) in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·82 [95% CI 0·61–1·11]; p=0·20). The most common grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (103 [69%] of 149 with daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone vs 76 [51%] of 150 with pomalidomide and dexamethasone), anaemia (27 [18%] vs 32 [21%]), and thrombocytopenia (27 [18%] vs 28 [19%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 80 (54%) of 149 patients in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group and in 60 (40%) of 150 patients in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group, the most common of which was pneumonia (23 [15%] of 149 vs 13 [9%] of 150). Treatment-emergent adverse events resulting in death occurred in 13 (9%) of 149 patients in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group and in 13 (9%) of 150 patients in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group, with 4 (3%) of 151 adverse events leading to death within 30 days of the last treatment dose thought to be related to study treatment in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (septic shock [n=1]; sepsis [n=1]; bone marrow failure, campylobacter infection, and liver disorder [n=1]; and pneumonia [n=1]) and none in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group. Interpretation: Although the difference in overall survival observed between treatment groups was not significant, the safety profile results with long-term follow-up reported here continue to support the use of daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Funding: European Myeloma Network and Janssen Research & Development. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
