Browsing by Author "Marjanovic, A. (56798179100)"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Five-year study of quality of life in myotonic dystrophy(2016) ;Peric, S. (35750481700) ;Vujnic, M. (56079611800) ;Dobricic, V. (22952783800) ;Marjanovic, A. (56798179100) ;Basta, I. (8274374200) ;Novakovic, I. (6603235567) ;Lavrnic, D. (6602473221)Rakocevic-Stojanovic, V. (6603893359)Background – Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is the most common muscular dystrophy in adults. There is a complete lack of studies that assessed quality of life (QoL) trajectory during time in DM1 cohorts. Aim – To analyze changes of QoL in patients with DM1 during a 5-year follow-up period and to assess responsiveness of the SF-36 questionnaire. Patients and Method – At the baseline, this study comprised 84 DM1 patients, of whom 62 were retested after the mean period of 64.2 ± 3.9 months. Severity of muscular weakness was assessed using the Muscular Impairment Rating Scale (MIRS). Patients completed Serbian version of the SF-36 questionnaire as a measure of health-related QoL. Results – After 5 years, MIRS score of our DM1 patients showed significant progression of 0.5 grade (P < 0.01). All mental subdomains, role physical, and total SF-36 scores significantly improved after 5 years (P < 0.01). Unexpectedly, worsening of muscular weakness from mild to severe was in association with improvement of QoL. Conclusion – QoL improved in our cohort of DM1 patients during a 5-year period despite the progression of the disease. SF-36 should be used with caution as a patient-reported outcome measure in DM1 clinical trials. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Five-year study of quality of life in myotonic dystrophy(2016) ;Peric, S. (35750481700) ;Vujnic, M. (56079611800) ;Dobricic, V. (22952783800) ;Marjanovic, A. (56798179100) ;Basta, I. (8274374200) ;Novakovic, I. (6603235567) ;Lavrnic, D. (6602473221)Rakocevic-Stojanovic, V. (6603893359)Background – Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is the most common muscular dystrophy in adults. There is a complete lack of studies that assessed quality of life (QoL) trajectory during time in DM1 cohorts. Aim – To analyze changes of QoL in patients with DM1 during a 5-year follow-up period and to assess responsiveness of the SF-36 questionnaire. Patients and Method – At the baseline, this study comprised 84 DM1 patients, of whom 62 were retested after the mean period of 64.2 ± 3.9 months. Severity of muscular weakness was assessed using the Muscular Impairment Rating Scale (MIRS). Patients completed Serbian version of the SF-36 questionnaire as a measure of health-related QoL. Results – After 5 years, MIRS score of our DM1 patients showed significant progression of 0.5 grade (P < 0.01). All mental subdomains, role physical, and total SF-36 scores significantly improved after 5 years (P < 0.01). Unexpectedly, worsening of muscular weakness from mild to severe was in association with improvement of QoL. Conclusion – QoL improved in our cohort of DM1 patients during a 5-year period despite the progression of the disease. SF-36 should be used with caution as a patient-reported outcome measure in DM1 clinical trials. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Prospective measurement of quality of life in myotonic dystrophy type 1(2017) ;Peric, S. (35750481700) ;Heatwole, C. (8257874900) ;Durovic, E. (57194648372) ;Kacar, A. (6602386522) ;Nikolic, A. (19933823000) ;Basta, I. (8274374200) ;Marjanovic, A. (56798179100) ;Stevic, Z. (57204495472) ;Lavrnic, D. (6602473221)Rakocevic Stojanovic, V. (6603893359)Introduction: Generic patient reported outcome measures have had varied success in tracking QoL in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Aim: To analyze changes of Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life questionnaire (INQoL) scores in clinic patients with DM1 over a 6-year period. Method: Patients completed the INQoL at baseline and after a 6-year period through their attendance in a neurology outpatient clinic. Severity of muscular involvement in DM1 was analyzed using the Muscular Impairment Rating Scale (MIRS). Results: Ninety-nine DM1 patients completed a baseline visit. Sixty-seven of these patients were retested at an interval time. The overall INQoL score improved in our sample of patients (P<.05) as did the following subscales: myotonia (P<.05), pain (P<.05), activities (P<.01), social relationships (P<.01), and body image (P<.05). No changes were observed for the independence and emotions scales. There were no differences in mean change of INQoL scores between patients with worsened MIRS and those with no change in MIRS scale after follow-up (P>.05). Conclusion: Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life questionnaire scores improved in our cohort of DM1 patients during a 6-year period. INQoL score did not correlate with progression of muscle weakness. This must be better understood before the selection of the instrument for use in trials to measure therapeutic benefit in DM1 patients. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Prospective measurement of quality of life in myotonic dystrophy type 1(2017) ;Peric, S. (35750481700) ;Heatwole, C. (8257874900) ;Durovic, E. (57194648372) ;Kacar, A. (6602386522) ;Nikolic, A. (19933823000) ;Basta, I. (8274374200) ;Marjanovic, A. (56798179100) ;Stevic, Z. (57204495472) ;Lavrnic, D. (6602473221)Rakocevic Stojanovic, V. (6603893359)Introduction: Generic patient reported outcome measures have had varied success in tracking QoL in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Aim: To analyze changes of Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life questionnaire (INQoL) scores in clinic patients with DM1 over a 6-year period. Method: Patients completed the INQoL at baseline and after a 6-year period through their attendance in a neurology outpatient clinic. Severity of muscular involvement in DM1 was analyzed using the Muscular Impairment Rating Scale (MIRS). Results: Ninety-nine DM1 patients completed a baseline visit. Sixty-seven of these patients were retested at an interval time. The overall INQoL score improved in our sample of patients (P<.05) as did the following subscales: myotonia (P<.05), pain (P<.05), activities (P<.01), social relationships (P<.01), and body image (P<.05). No changes were observed for the independence and emotions scales. There were no differences in mean change of INQoL scores between patients with worsened MIRS and those with no change in MIRS scale after follow-up (P>.05). Conclusion: Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life questionnaire scores improved in our cohort of DM1 patients during a 6-year period. INQoL score did not correlate with progression of muscle weakness. This must be better understood before the selection of the instrument for use in trials to measure therapeutic benefit in DM1 patients. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
