Browsing by Author "Marinkovic, Nemanja (57202070226)"

Background: Cameriere’s method has been tested in many populations and is widely accepted for dental age estimation. Aim: To establish a new formula for age estimation by measurement of open apices of mandibular teeth based on Cameriere’s European formula. Subjects and methods: Panoramic radiographs of 333 healthy Serbian children aged 5–14 years were analysed by two independent researchers. The new formula–Belgrade Age Formula (BAF)–was created and tested on the same Serbian sample. Furthermore, BAF was tested on the Serbian validation sample of 126 children and 2115 Italian children aged 5–14 years. Results: In the Serbian sample, the residuals of the BAF and European formula demonstrated that BAF is significantly better in age estimation than the European formula. No significant difference was found in females from the Serbian validation sample between dental and chronological age when BAF was applied. For males, the BAF and European formula had similar accuracy. In the Italian sample, the mean differences between estimated and real age for the European formula were −0.214 ± 0.934 and 0.109 ± 0.773 for females and males, respectively, while for BAF these differences were 0.182 ± 0.951 and −0.195 ± 0.923 for females and males, respectively. Conclusion: BAF was found to be accurate in the Serbian and Italian populations. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Background: Cameriere’s method has been tested in many populations and is widely accepted for dental age estimation. Aim: To establish a new formula for age estimation by measurement of open apices of mandibular teeth based on Cameriere’s European formula. Subjects and methods: Panoramic radiographs of 333 healthy Serbian children aged 5–14 years were analysed by two independent researchers. The new formula–Belgrade Age Formula (BAF)–was created and tested on the same Serbian sample. Furthermore, BAF was tested on the Serbian validation sample of 126 children and 2115 Italian children aged 5–14 years. Results: In the Serbian sample, the residuals of the BAF and European formula demonstrated that BAF is significantly better in age estimation than the European formula. No significant difference was found in females from the Serbian validation sample between dental and chronological age when BAF was applied. For males, the BAF and European formula had similar accuracy. In the Italian sample, the mean differences between estimated and real age for the European formula were −0.214 ± 0.934 and 0.109 ± 0.773 for females and males, respectively, while for BAF these differences were 0.182 ± 0.951 and −0.195 ± 0.923 for females and males, respectively. Conclusion: BAF was found to be accurate in the Serbian and Italian populations. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Objective: To assess dental age and deviations of dental from chronological age according to the Willems and Cameriere methods (European formula) in patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) and compare it with control group. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting: Clinic of Orthodontics. Participants: Sixty-nine patients with CL/P between 6 and 15 years of age (55 with unilateral and 14 with bilateral CL/P) with 148 panoramic radiographs. The same number of radiographs was examined in the age-matched control group. Main Outcome Measures: Estimation and comparison of dental age and differences of dental from chronological age in relation to the type of cleft, sex, and age in the group of patients with and without CL/P according to Willems and Cameriere method. Results: No significant intersex and intergroup differences were found in deviations of dental from chronological age according to Cameriere method (P >.05). Significant difference in deviation of dental from chronological age was found between the patients with and without CL/P according to Willems method (P <.001). Conclusion: Cameriere European formula for dental age estimation, which is not influenced by sex and tooth morphology, showed similar dental development of children with and without CL/P. However, Willems method detected that deviation of dental from chronological age significantly differed between children with and without clefts. © American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. All rights reserved 2021.

Objective: To assess dental age and deviations of dental from chronological age according to the Willems and Cameriere methods (European formula) in patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) and compare it with control group. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting: Clinic of Orthodontics. Participants: Sixty-nine patients with CL/P between 6 and 15 years of age (55 with unilateral and 14 with bilateral CL/P) with 148 panoramic radiographs. The same number of radiographs was examined in the age-matched control group. Main Outcome Measures: Estimation and comparison of dental age and differences of dental from chronological age in relation to the type of cleft, sex, and age in the group of patients with and without CL/P according to Willems and Cameriere method. Results: No significant intersex and intergroup differences were found in deviations of dental from chronological age according to Cameriere method (P >.05). Significant difference in deviation of dental from chronological age was found between the patients with and without CL/P according to Willems method (P <.001). Conclusion: Cameriere European formula for dental age estimation, which is not influenced by sex and tooth morphology, showed similar dental development of children with and without CL/P. However, Willems method detected that deviation of dental from chronological age significantly differed between children with and without clefts. © American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. All rights reserved 2021.

Aims: To test the applicability of European formula for dental maturity estimation in non-adults on Serbian sample and compare its accuracy with Willems’ age estimation method. Materials and methods: Panoramic radiographs of 423 children (192 boys and 231 girls) aged between 5 to 15 were evaluated. Willems’ method and European formula were applied to estimate dental age. Intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficients between estimated age and chronological age for each method and sex were reported separately. Furthermore, the percentage of individuals with estimated age within error range of ±0.5 year was calculated. Results: Total sample was divided into three groups (<7 years, 7–13 years, ≥13 years). In individuals younger than 7 years, the highest ICC coefficients were achieved with European formula (0.609 in girls and 0.487 in boys). Willems’ method showed better ICC coefficients in individuals older than 13 years (0.378 in girls and 0.600 in boys). In individuals between 7 and 13 years, ICC coefficients were between 0.800 and 0.900 with both methods European formula estimated the age in 47.6% of girls and 42.5% of boys within error range of ±0.5 year. Willems’ method reported similar results (45.4% in girls and 40.4% in boys). Conclusions: The Willems’ method is more appropriate for individuals older than 13 years. European formula gives better results for individuals younger than 7 years. In individuals between 7 and 13 years there is no significant difference between European formula and Willems’ method, yet, European formula was found to be slightly more accurate. © 2018 Elsevier B.V.