Browsing by Author "Lukić, Katarina (59004030300)"

[No abstract available]

Background/Objectives: Patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer represent a very heterogeneous group of patients. In the past, the standard of care for patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer was concurrent or sequential radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. But the progression-free survival was 8 months, and the 5-year overall survival rate was less than 20%. After the results of the PACIFIC study, the standard of care for this group of patients is chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab as consolidation therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of consolidation durvalumab in a real-world setting after sequential CRT. Methods: We included 24 patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer who did not progress after sequential chemoradiotherapy and who received durvalumab consolidation. Results: Median progression-free survival was 16 months, 95% CI (0.5–31.5), and median overall survival was 20 months, 95% CI (13.4–26.6 months). The twelve-month progression-free survival and overall survival rate were 55.1% and 68%, respectively, and the 18-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 44.1% and 56.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Durvalumab introduced a new era in the treatment of patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer with a significantly prolonged 5-year overall survival rate. Our study is one of the few that investigated the efficacy of durvalumab in a real-world setting after sequential CRT. Our results showed that durvalumab is effective in patients who were treated with sequential CRT. However, the time between radiotherapy termination and the start of durvalumab should be shorter. © 2025 by the authors.

Background/Objectives: Patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer represent a very heterogeneous group of patients. In the past, the standard of care for patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer was concurrent or sequential radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. But the progression-free survival was 8 months, and the 5-year overall survival rate was less than 20%. After the results of the PACIFIC study, the standard of care for this group of patients is chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab as consolidation therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of consolidation durvalumab in a real-world setting after sequential CRT. Methods: We included 24 patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer who did not progress after sequential chemoradiotherapy and who received durvalumab consolidation. Results: Median progression-free survival was 16 months, 95% CI (0.5–31.5), and median overall survival was 20 months, 95% CI (13.4–26.6 months). The twelve-month progression-free survival and overall survival rate were 55.1% and 68%, respectively, and the 18-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 44.1% and 56.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Durvalumab introduced a new era in the treatment of patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer with a significantly prolonged 5-year overall survival rate. Our study is one of the few that investigated the efficacy of durvalumab in a real-world setting after sequential CRT. Our results showed that durvalumab is effective in patients who were treated with sequential CRT. However, the time between radiotherapy termination and the start of durvalumab should be shorter. © 2025 by the authors.

Before the introduction of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of up to 10%. After the positive results of KEYNOTE-024, pembrolizumab was approved in a first-line setting for patients with metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥ 50%. A small number of patients had a durable response to immunotherapy, and so far it has not been discovered who will benefit. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression in a real-world setting. We enrolled 35 patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC who had PD-L1 ≥ 50%. Progression-free survival was 9 months, 95% CI (2.6–15.4). Overall survival was 14 months, 95% CI (0–28.5). Five-year OS rate for the whole group of patients was 20%, and the six-year OS rate was 17.2%. Immunotherapy was a revolution in the treatment of NSCLC. We still do not know which patients will benefit from immunotherapy, but patients who do respond may experience long-term outcomes. © 2025 by the authors.

Background/Objectives: A significant breakthrough in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment has occurred with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. However, not all patients treated with these therapies would respond to treatment, and patients who respond to treatment would acquire resistance at some time point. This is why we need new biomarkers that can predict response to therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether soluble programmed cell death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1) could be a predictive biomarker in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive NSCLC. Materials and Methods: Blood samples from 35 patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRmut) adenocarcinoma who achieved disease control with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) therapy were collected for sPD-L1 analysis. We analyzed sPD-L1 concentrations in 30 healthy middle-aged subjects, as a control population, to determine the reference range. Adenocarcinoma patients were divided into two groups, i.e., a group with low sPD-L1 (≤182.5 ng/L) and a group with high sPD-L1 (>182.5 ng/L). Results: We found that progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 months, 95% CI (11.1–24.9), for patients with low sPD-L1 and 25 months, 95% CI (8.3–41.7), for patients with high sPD-L1. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the groups (p = 0.100). Overall survival (OS) was 34.4 months, 95% CI (26.6–42.2), for patients with low sPD-L1 and 84.1 months, 95% CI (50.6–117.6), for patients with high sPD-L1; there was also no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.114). Conclusion: In our study, we found that patients with high sPD-L1 had numerically better PFS and OS, but this has no statistical significance. Further studies with a larger number of patients are needed to evaluate the role of sPD-L1 as a predictive biomarker in patients with EGFRmut NSCLC. © 2025 by the authors.

Background/Objectives: A significant breakthrough in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment has occurred with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. However, not all patients treated with these therapies would respond to treatment, and patients who respond to treatment would acquire resistance at some time point. This is why we need new biomarkers that can predict response to therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether soluble programmed cell death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1) could be a predictive biomarker in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive NSCLC. Materials and Methods: Blood samples from 35 patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRmut) adenocarcinoma who achieved disease control with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) therapy were collected for sPD-L1 analysis. We analyzed sPD-L1 concentrations in 30 healthy middle-aged subjects, as a control population, to determine the reference range. Adenocarcinoma patients were divided into two groups, i.e., a group with low sPD-L1 (≤182.5 ng/L) and a group with high sPD-L1 (>182.5 ng/L). Results: We found that progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 months, 95% CI (11.1–24.9), for patients with low sPD-L1 and 25 months, 95% CI (8.3–41.7), for patients with high sPD-L1. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the groups (p = 0.100). Overall survival (OS) was 34.4 months, 95% CI (26.6–42.2), for patients with low sPD-L1 and 84.1 months, 95% CI (50.6–117.6), for patients with high sPD-L1; there was also no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.114). Conclusion: In our study, we found that patients with high sPD-L1 had numerically better PFS and OS, but this has no statistical significance. Further studies with a larger number of patients are needed to evaluate the role of sPD-L1 as a predictive biomarker in patients with EGFRmut NSCLC. © 2025 by the authors.