Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Licchelli, Martina (57223083139)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Fibroid Removal after Myomectomy: An Overview on the Problems of Power Morcellation
    (2022)
    Sparić, Radmila (23487159800)
    ;
    Andjić, Mladen (57725550500)
    ;
    D’Oria, Ottavia (58314356300)
    ;
    Babović, Ivana (14828590600)
    ;
    Milovanović, Zagorka (24829789900)
    ;
    Panese, Gaetano (57223092147)
    ;
    Licchelli, Martina (57223083139)
    ;
    Tomašević, Đina (57211993396)
    ;
    Morciano, Andrea (36492237600)
    ;
    Tinelli, Andrea (15046058900)
    The authors reviewed uterine fibroid (UF) morcellation and its potential consequences, notably a hypothetical spread and dissemination of occult uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) tissue, evaluating the effect of laparoscopic versus open myomectomies with and without morcellation on patients’ outcomes, as well as related medical-legal issues. MEDLINE and PubMed search was performed for the years 1990–2021, using a combination of keywords on this topic. Relevant articles were identified and included in this narrative review. There is an individual risk, for all patients, for LMS diagnosis after myomectomy. However, the risk for occult LMS diagnosis during a laparoscopic myomectomy is generally reduced when the guidelines of scientific societies are followed, with an overall benefit from the laparoscopic approach with morcellation in appropriate cases. Gynecological societies do not ban morcellation and laparoscopic hysterectomy/myomectomy per se, but recommend their use on the basis of the patients’ clinical characteristics. It is suggested for gynecologists to provide detailed information to patients when obtaining an informed consent for open or laparoscopic hysterectomy/myomectomy. A detailed preoperative assessment of patients and the risk benefit ratio of laparoscopic morcellation of uterine mass could overcome the “a priori” banning of the morcellation technique. © 2022 by the authors.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Fibroid Removal after Myomectomy: An Overview on the Problems of Power Morcellation
    (2022)
    Sparić, Radmila (23487159800)
    ;
    Andjić, Mladen (57725550500)
    ;
    D’Oria, Ottavia (58314356300)
    ;
    Babović, Ivana (14828590600)
    ;
    Milovanović, Zagorka (24829789900)
    ;
    Panese, Gaetano (57223092147)
    ;
    Licchelli, Martina (57223083139)
    ;
    Tomašević, Đina (57211993396)
    ;
    Morciano, Andrea (36492237600)
    ;
    Tinelli, Andrea (15046058900)
    The authors reviewed uterine fibroid (UF) morcellation and its potential consequences, notably a hypothetical spread and dissemination of occult uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) tissue, evaluating the effect of laparoscopic versus open myomectomies with and without morcellation on patients’ outcomes, as well as related medical-legal issues. MEDLINE and PubMed search was performed for the years 1990–2021, using a combination of keywords on this topic. Relevant articles were identified and included in this narrative review. There is an individual risk, for all patients, for LMS diagnosis after myomectomy. However, the risk for occult LMS diagnosis during a laparoscopic myomectomy is generally reduced when the guidelines of scientific societies are followed, with an overall benefit from the laparoscopic approach with morcellation in appropriate cases. Gynecological societies do not ban morcellation and laparoscopic hysterectomy/myomectomy per se, but recommend their use on the basis of the patients’ clinical characteristics. It is suggested for gynecologists to provide detailed information to patients when obtaining an informed consent for open or laparoscopic hysterectomy/myomectomy. A detailed preoperative assessment of patients and the risk benefit ratio of laparoscopic morcellation of uterine mass could overcome the “a priori” banning of the morcellation technique. © 2022 by the authors.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Laparoscopic repair of uterine rupture after delivery: A comprehensive evaluation of the uterine rupture management, with a proposal surgical method
    (2025)
    Pecorella, Giovanni (58548476100)
    ;
    Licchelli, Martina (57223083139)
    ;
    Panese, Gaetano (57223092147)
    ;
    Morciano, Andrea (36492237600)
    ;
    Sparic, Radmila (23487159800)
    ;
    Kosmas, Ioannis (6505812615)
    ;
    De Rosa, Filippo (57207770512)
    ;
    Malvasi, Antonio (15045047100)
    ;
    Tinelli, Andrea (15046058900)
    Uterine rupture constitutes a critical obstetric emergency that presents substantial risks to both the maternal and fetal populations. This investigation evaluated the surgical interventions available for uterine rupture, emphasizing laparoscopic repair subsequent to uterine rupture. Laparoscopic repair serves as a fertility-sustaining alternative to conventional laparotomy, demonstrating comparable operative durations of 80 min (interquartile range [IQR] 60–114) for laparoscopic procedures versus 78 min (IQR 58–114) for laparotomy interventions. Nevertheless, laparoscopic approaches confer significant advantages, including a reduced incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (14.2% vs. 40% for laparotomy), a diminished requirement for blood transfusions (14.2% vs. 60%), and abbreviated hospital stays (median of 3 days vs. 5 days for laparotomy). The investigation explored the contentious discourse surrounding single-layer versus double-layer suturing methodologies, noting that barbed sutures significantly decrease uterine closure times (224 ± 46 vs. 343 ± 75 s for traditional sutures). Single-layer suturing is advocated as sufficient for maintaining uterine integrity in suitably selected cases. The necessity of meticulous postoperative monitoring, particularly concerning the assessment of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies, is emphasized, with recurrence rates varying from 4.8% to 19.4%. Finally, authors also proposed a feasible laparoscopic technique to repair a uterine rupture (the “CHEESE” method [closure of hemodynamically stable, early uterine rupture, via endoscopic surgery after spontaneous delivery]), appropriate for hemodynamically stable patients with minor ruptures. This review underscores the progressive role of minimally invasive techniques in the management of uterine rupture and seeks to optimize clinical outcomes for both maternal and neonatal health. © 2025 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback