Browsing by Author "Lalic, Katarina S. (13702563300)"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication A 26-week randomized controlled trial of semaglutide once daily versus liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled on diet and exercise with or without metformin(2018) ;Lingvay, Ildiko (12763009500) ;Desouza, Cyrus V. (7005628017) ;Lalic, Katarina S. (13702563300) ;Rose, Ludger (55836268600) ;Hansen, Thomas (6602275841) ;Zacho, Jeppe (57203441073)Pieber, Thomas R. (7005520071)OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of once-daily semaglutide in comparison with once-daily liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This 26-week, multicenter, double-blind trial involved patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes with HbA1c 7.0-10.0% (53-86 mmol/mol) and treated with diet and exercise with or without metformin. Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to once-daily semaglutide, liraglutide, or placebo in one of four volume-matched doses (semaglutide 0.05,0.1,0.2, or 0.3 mg and liraglutide 0.3,0.6, 1.2, or 1.8 mg, with both compared within each volume-matched dose group). Primary end point was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. RESULTS: In total, 705 randomized patients were exposed to trial products. At week 26, a dose-dependent change in HbA1c was observed with semaglutide from 21.1% (0.05 mg) to 21.9% (0.3 mg) and with liraglutide from 20.5% (0.3 mg) to 21.3% (1.8 mg) (all P < 0.001 in favor of volume-matched semaglutide dose). Change with pooled placebo was 20.02% (P < 0.0001 vs. semaglutide). Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders were the most common adverse events (AEs) with semaglutide and liraglutide, occurring in 32.8-54.0% and 21.9-41.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily semaglutide at doses up to 0.3 mg/day resulted in greater reductions in HbA1c compared with liraglutide or placebo but with a higher frequency of GI AEs. © 2018 by the American Diabetes Association. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication A 26-week randomized controlled trial of semaglutide once daily versus liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled on diet and exercise with or without metformin(2018) ;Lingvay, Ildiko (12763009500) ;Desouza, Cyrus V. (7005628017) ;Lalic, Katarina S. (13702563300) ;Rose, Ludger (55836268600) ;Hansen, Thomas (6602275841) ;Zacho, Jeppe (57203441073)Pieber, Thomas R. (7005520071)OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of once-daily semaglutide in comparison with once-daily liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This 26-week, multicenter, double-blind trial involved patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes with HbA1c 7.0-10.0% (53-86 mmol/mol) and treated with diet and exercise with or without metformin. Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to once-daily semaglutide, liraglutide, or placebo in one of four volume-matched doses (semaglutide 0.05,0.1,0.2, or 0.3 mg and liraglutide 0.3,0.6, 1.2, or 1.8 mg, with both compared within each volume-matched dose group). Primary end point was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. RESULTS: In total, 705 randomized patients were exposed to trial products. At week 26, a dose-dependent change in HbA1c was observed with semaglutide from 21.1% (0.05 mg) to 21.9% (0.3 mg) and with liraglutide from 20.5% (0.3 mg) to 21.3% (1.8 mg) (all P < 0.001 in favor of volume-matched semaglutide dose). Change with pooled placebo was 20.02% (P < 0.0001 vs. semaglutide). Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders were the most common adverse events (AEs) with semaglutide and liraglutide, occurring in 32.8-54.0% and 21.9-41.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily semaglutide at doses up to 0.3 mg/day resulted in greater reductions in HbA1c compared with liraglutide or placebo but with a higher frequency of GI AEs. © 2018 by the American Diabetes Association. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Acute effects of ghrelin on insulin secretion and glucose disposal rate in gastrectomized patients(2006) ;Damjanovic, Svetozar S. (7003775804) ;Lalic, Nebojsa M. (13702597500) ;Pesko, Predrag M. (7004246956) ;Petakov, Milan S. (7003976693) ;Jotic, Aleksandra (13702545200) ;Miljic, Dragana (6505968542) ;Lalic, Katarina S. (13702563300) ;Lukic, Ljiljana (24073403700) ;Djurovic, Marina (6603668923)Djukic, Vojko B. (6701658274)Context: Plasma ghrelin concentration is diminished in gastrectomized patients. Acute ghrelin administration reduces insulin secretion, whereas insulin infusion has been shown to decrease ghrelin levels. Whether ghrelin has any effect on glucose utilization in humans is unknown. Objective: Our objective was to reveal the effect of ghrelin on insulin-mediated glucose disposal in gastrectomized patients. Study and Setting: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, hospital-based study. Patients: Seven men and three women who all had a previous total gastrectomy and truncal vagotomy entered and completed the study. Intervention: Each individual received infusion of saline alone or saline with ghrelin (5.0 pmol/kg·min) during a 5-h hyperinsulinemic (80 mU/m2·min) euglycemic clamp on 2 separate days. Main Outcome Measures: We assessed glucose disposal rate and concentrations of C-peptide, ghrelin, GH, IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 and -1, cortisol, leptin, and adiponectin. Results: Glucose disposal rate decreased during ghrelin infusion (control study 8.6 ± 0.2 vs. 7.2 ± 0.1 mg/kg·min P < 0.001). In experiments with saline infusion, levels of ghrelin (P < 0.001), C-peptide (P < 0.001), glucagon (P < 0.001), adiponectin (P = 0.005), cortisol (P = 0.012), IGF-I (P < 0.001), IGFBP-3 (P = 0.038), and IGFBP-1 (P = 0.001) fell in response to euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. GH concentration maintained at baseline, whereas leptin significantly rose (P < 0.001). In the ghrelin infusion study, the plateau level of ghrelin concentration (6963.6 ± 212.9 pg/ml) was maintained from 90 min throughout the experiment. GH (P < 0.001) and cortisol (P = 0.04) concentrations rose, whereas C-peptide levels were more suppressed than in the control study (P < 0.001). Other hormones and IGFBPs changed similarly as in the study with saline infusion. Conclusion: It appears that ghrelin might be involved in the negative control of insulin secretion and glucose consumption in gastrectomized patients, at least after acute administration. Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Acute effects of ghrelin on insulin secretion and glucose disposal rate in gastrectomized patients(2006) ;Damjanovic, Svetozar S. (7003775804) ;Lalic, Nebojsa M. (13702597500) ;Pesko, Predrag M. (7004246956) ;Petakov, Milan S. (7003976693) ;Jotic, Aleksandra (13702545200) ;Miljic, Dragana (6505968542) ;Lalic, Katarina S. (13702563300) ;Lukic, Ljiljana (24073403700) ;Djurovic, Marina (6603668923)Djukic, Vojko B. (6701658274)Context: Plasma ghrelin concentration is diminished in gastrectomized patients. Acute ghrelin administration reduces insulin secretion, whereas insulin infusion has been shown to decrease ghrelin levels. Whether ghrelin has any effect on glucose utilization in humans is unknown. Objective: Our objective was to reveal the effect of ghrelin on insulin-mediated glucose disposal in gastrectomized patients. Study and Setting: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, hospital-based study. Patients: Seven men and three women who all had a previous total gastrectomy and truncal vagotomy entered and completed the study. Intervention: Each individual received infusion of saline alone or saline with ghrelin (5.0 pmol/kg·min) during a 5-h hyperinsulinemic (80 mU/m2·min) euglycemic clamp on 2 separate days. Main Outcome Measures: We assessed glucose disposal rate and concentrations of C-peptide, ghrelin, GH, IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 and -1, cortisol, leptin, and adiponectin. Results: Glucose disposal rate decreased during ghrelin infusion (control study 8.6 ± 0.2 vs. 7.2 ± 0.1 mg/kg·min P < 0.001). In experiments with saline infusion, levels of ghrelin (P < 0.001), C-peptide (P < 0.001), glucagon (P < 0.001), adiponectin (P = 0.005), cortisol (P = 0.012), IGF-I (P < 0.001), IGFBP-3 (P = 0.038), and IGFBP-1 (P = 0.001) fell in response to euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. GH concentration maintained at baseline, whereas leptin significantly rose (P < 0.001). In the ghrelin infusion study, the plateau level of ghrelin concentration (6963.6 ± 212.9 pg/ml) was maintained from 90 min throughout the experiment. GH (P < 0.001) and cortisol (P = 0.04) concentrations rose, whereas C-peptide levels were more suppressed than in the control study (P < 0.001). Other hormones and IGFBPs changed similarly as in the study with saline infusion. Conclusion: It appears that ghrelin might be involved in the negative control of insulin secretion and glucose consumption in gastrectomized patients, at least after acute administration. Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Development of ALOHa-G Risk Score for Detecting Postpartum Dyslipidemia Among Normoglycemic Women with Previous Gestational Diabetes: Observational Cohort Study(2023) ;Jotic, Aleksandra Z. (13702545200) ;Stoiljkovic, Milica M. (57215024953) ;Milicic, Tanja J. (24073432600) ;Lalic, Katarina S. (13702563300) ;Lukic, Ljiljana Z. (24073403700) ;Macesic, Marija V. (26967836100) ;Stanarcic Gajovic, Jelena N. (56089716900) ;Milovancevic, Mina M. (57236937100) ;Pavlovic, Vedrana R. (57202093978) ;Gojnic, Miroslava G. (9434266300) ;Rafailovic, Djurdja P. (58144091500)Lalic, Nebojsa M. (13702597500)Introduction: Previous gestational diabetes (pGD) is associated with a high risk of postpartum dyslipidemia (pD). Our study was aimed at investigating the prevalence of pD and estimating the risk for pD based on metabolic pregnancy parameters in normoglycemic women with pGD. Methods: 147 women with pGD and normoglycemia after delivery were divided into groups: A (n = 63) with pD and B (n = 84) with normal lipids, defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program's Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report (NCEP ATP III). We recorded age, body mass index (BMI) at conception, fasting glucose (FG), HbA1c, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (Tg), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-c), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) measured mid-pregnancy and 1–6 months after delivery. GD was diagnosed by 2 h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between the 24th and the 28th week of gestation, which was repeated after delivery to confirm normoglycemia. Results: 42.8% had pD (group A) while 57.2% had normal lipids (group B). Group A was older (36.8 ± 2.7) than B (33.0 ± 4.2 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher BMI (A 31.2 ± 6.4 vs. B 25.5 ± 2.4 kg/m2, p < 0.001). Simultaneously, HbA1c and FG were higher in group A (5.4 ± 0.3, 5.1 ± 0.4) than B (5.2 ± 0.0%, p = 0.001; 4.8 ± 0.0 mmol/L, p < 0.001). Also, group A had higher TC, LDL-c, and Tg [6.6 (6.1–6.9); 4.2 ± 0.4; 2.9 ± 0.8] compared to B [6.2 (5.4–6.9), p < 0.001; 3.4 ± 0.9, p = 0.001; 2.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001], while the two groups had comparable HDL-c (A: 1.2 ± 0.3 vs. B: 1.2 ± 0.2 mmol/L, p = 0.998). Calculating the cutoff for age, BMI, HbA1c, FG, LDL-c, and Tg (> 35 years, 26.4 kg/m2, 5.2%, 4.8, 3.9 and 2.7 mmol/L, respectively), univariate regression analysis showed a difference for each (p < 0.001). Allocating 1 point to each predictor, we developed ALOHa G score, which showed high accuracy (AUC 0.931, p < 0.001) for risk of pD in normoglycemic women with pGD. According to the ALOHa-G score, more women in group A were at high risk (≥ 4) and medium risk (= 3) (61.9; 34.9) for pD than in group B (4.8; 14.3), with a lower percentage at low risk for PD (≤ 2) in group A than in group B (3.2 vs. 81.0%). Conclusion: Our results implied a remarkable occurrence of pD in normoglycemic women with pGD. Also, the ALOHa-G score was developed based on pregnancy metabolic predictors and could be used to identify normoglycemic women with pGD who are at high risk for pD. © 2023, The Author(s). - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Predictors of Composite Maternal and Fetal Outcomes among Pregnant Women with Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study(2025) ;Jotic, Aleksandra Z. (13702545200) ;Stoiljkovic, Milica M. (57215024953) ;Milicic, Tanja J. (24073432600) ;Lalic, Katarina S. (13702563300) ;Lukic, Ljiljana Z. (24073403700) ;Macesic, Marija V. (26967836100) ;Gajovic, Jelena N. Stanarcic (56089716900) ;Milovancevic, Mina M. (57236937100) ;Obradovic, Marko H. (57202624747) ;Gojnic, Miroslava G. (9434266300) ;Rafailovic, Djurdja P. (58144091500)Lalic, Nebojsa M. (13702597500)Introduction: The most common form of pregestational diabetes in pregnancy is type 2 diabetes, requiring strict metabolic monitoring owing to the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Our study aimed to identify predictors of composite maternal outcome (CMO) and fetal outcome (CFO) separately in pregnant women with early-onset type 2 diabetes (PwEOT2D). Methods: The cross-sectional pilot study included 60 PwEOT2D by recording age, socioeconomic determinants, preconception body mass index (pBMI), preconception (pHbA1c) and trimester-specific glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), gestational weight gain (GWG), and pregnancy outcomes. We defined CMO as at least one of the following: gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia, preterm delivery, or emergency section. CFO included at least one of the following: small or large for gestational age, macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Results: CMO was detected in 55% and CFO in 35% of PwEOT2D. The majority of PwEOT2D with CMO lived in suburban areas (73.1%), while those without CMO mostly lived in rural areas (51.9%, p = 0.014). Moreover, PwEOT2D with CMO had comparable pBMI to those without CMO (31.45 ± 6.27 versus 28.99 ± 6.28 kg/m2, p = 0.136). However, PwEOT2D with CMO had higher pHbA1c (7.28 ± 0.95 versus 6.46 ± 0.96%, p = 0.002) and first trimester HbA1c (7.24 ± 1.08 versus 6.42 ± 0.97%, p = 0.003). Similarly, PwEOT2D with CFO had higher pHbA1c (7.84 ± 0.95 versus 6.41 ± 0.67%, p < 0.001) and first trimester (7.29 ± 1.07 versus 6.65 ± 1.07%, p = 0.032) and second trimester HbA1c (6.45 ± 0.87 versus 5.96 ± 0.82%, p = 0.038). Additionally, GWG was higher in the second (4.38 ± 2.01 versus 3.33 ± 1.61 kg, p = 0.032) and third trimester (5.66 ± 2.93 versus 3.89 ± 2.61 kg, p = 0.002) compared with those without CMO. Regression analysis identified pHbA1c, first trimester of pregnancy, and community type as predictors of CMO, while pHbA1c and the occurrence of CMO were predictors of CFO. Conclusions: Our results imply that preconception and first trimester of pregnancy HbA1c, as well as community disparities, are predictors of CMO, while the predictors of CFO were only preconception HbA1c and the occurrence of CMO in pregnant women with EOT2D. Therefore, tailoring preventive strategies, followed by achieving and sustaining trimester-specific metabolic control, might improve pregnancy outcomes in women with EOT2D. © The Author(s) 2025. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Prevalence and Metabolic Predictors for Early Diagnosed Prediabetes in Women with Previous Gestational Diabetes: Observational Cohort Study(2021) ;Jotic, Aleksandra Z. (13702545200) ;Stoiljkovic, Milica M. (57215024953) ;Milicic, Tanja J. (24073432600) ;Lalic, Katarina S. (13702563300) ;Lukic, Ljiljana Z. (24073403700) ;Macesic, Marija V. (26967836100) ;Stanarcic Gajovic, Jelena N. (56089716900) ;Milovancevic, Mina M. (57236937100) ;Gojnic Dugalic, Miroslava G. (9434266300) ;Jeremic, Veljko M. (36100429200)Lalic, Nebojsa M. (13702597500)Introduction: Women with previous gestational diabetes (pGD) are at higher risk of prediabetes (PD) after delivery. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of and predictors for PD among women with pGD. Methods: The study included 186 women with pGD treated by lifestyle modification. After delivery, the women were divided into group A (n = 80) with PD and group B (n = 106) with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), defined by the results of the 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 4–12 weeks after delivery. We recorded age, body mass index (BMI) at conception and after delivery, fasting glucose (FG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (Tg), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and the Tg/HDL-c ratio measured in the third trimester of pregnancy. Results: Of the 186 women with pGD enrolled in the study, 43% showed prediabetes at 4–12 weeks after delivery, with 13.9% of these women showing impaired FG (IFG), 12.9% showing impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 16.2% with IFG/IGT. The groups differed in terms of age and BMI at conception and after delivery. In the third trimester of pregnancy, HbA1c was higher in women in group A than in those in group B (mean ± standard deviation: 5.6 ± 0.4 vs. 5.2 ± 0.3%; p < 0.001), while FG was comparable. Compared to women in group B, women in group A had higher TC (7.1 ± 0.8 vs. 6.6 ± 1.0 mmol/L), Tg (2.7 ± 0.9 vs. 2.1 ± 0.6 mmol/L) and LDL-c (4.7 ± 0.8 vs. 4.3 ± 1.0 mmol/L) (all p < 0.001), lower HDL-c (1.0 ± 0.2 vs. 1.4 ± 1.0; p < 0.001) and higher median Tg/HDL-c (5.4 [range 4.6–14.3] vs. 4.9 [range 1.1–11.5]; p < 0.001). Univariate analysis found an association between prediabetes and age, BMI at conception and after delivery, HbA1c, TC, LDL-c, HDL-c, Tg and Tg/HDL-c ratio. Of these variables, the multivariate analysis showed age (odds ratio [OR] 1.19; p < 0.001), HbA1c (OR 31.06; p < 0.001), Tg (OR 4.09; p < 0.001) and LDL-c (OR 2.00; p = 0.005) as predictors for prediabetes. Conclusion: High prevalence of early diagnosed PD in women with pGD was accompanied by advanced age and higher BMI at conception and after delivery. Moreover, age, HbA1c, Tg and LDL-c were predictors for PD. © 2021, The Author(s). - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Sex Differences in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia(2024) ;Mulder, Janneke W.C.M. (57212104608) ;Tromp, Tycho R. (56567925200) ;Al-Khnifsawi, Mutaz (57203941293) ;Blom, Dirk J. (7005939626) ;Chlebus, Krysztof (35614248700) ;Cuchel, Marina (6602971540) ;D’Erasmo, Laura (55043226200) ;Gallo, Antonio (57188832752) ;Kees Hovingh, G. (59454565900) ;Kim, Ngoc Thanh (57196318023) ;Long, Jiang (58906474300) ;Raal, Frederick J. (7003901975) ;Schonck, Willemijn A.M. (57328040900) ;Soran, Handrean (6602902489) ;Truong, Thanh-Huong (57190440149) ;Boersma, Eric (7102815542) ;Roeters van Lennep, Jeanine E. (6507052705) ;Freiberger, Tomas (55885407200) ;Tichy, Lukas (36444529600) ;Defesche, Joep C. (7004108602) ;Zuurbier, Linda (57261309300) ;Pang, Jing (55218561500) ;Watts, Gerald F. (57210953292) ;Greber-Platzer, Susanne (6603024074) ;Mäser, Martin (57421277600) ;Stulnig, Thomas M. (7004617638) ;Ebenbichler, Christoph F. (7004066662) ;Thaní, Khalid Bin (36912158900) ;Cassiman, David (6602482113) ;Descamps, Olivier S. (6701764714) ;Rymen, Daisy (55356126300) ;Witters, Peter (24170273300) ;Santos, Raul D. (59334991000) ;Brunham, Liam R. (6507401746) ;Francis, Gordon A. (7201978216) ;Genest, Jacques (57211399465) ;Hegele, Robert A. (57201452688) ;Kennedy, Brooke A. (7402502861) ;Ruel, Isabelle (6602597443) ;Sherman, Mark H. (59740962900) ;Wang, Luya (7409180188) ;Reiner, Željko (55411641000) ;Blaha, Vladimir (7006591320) ;Ceska, Richard (7005272416) ;Dvorakova, Jana (57194516490) ;Horak, Pavel (59644870600) ;Soska, Vladimir (7003895340) ;Urbanék, Robin (57203725965) ;Vaverkova, Helena (7003431687) ;Vrablik, Michal (57212849663) ;Zemek, Stanislav (8393974300) ;Zlatohlavek, Lukas (15128422100) ;Emil, Sameh (37074223300) ;Naguib, Tarek A. (57189066768) ;Reda, Ashraf (36700243800) ;Béliard, Sophie (15080605400) ;Bruckert, Eric (55539414500) ;Kolovou, Genovefa (7003730110) ;Liberopoulos, Evangelos (6701664518) ;Cohen, Hofit (56565969800) ;Durst, Ronen (7005127717) ;Dann, Eldad J. (7004119206) ;Elis, Avishay (7003393496) ;Hussein, Osama (6603747077) ;Leitersdorf, Eran (7006121849) ;Schurr, Daniel (6602692038) ;Setia, Nitika (54881464400) ;Verma, Ishwar C. (16557099300) ;Alaredh, Mohammed D. (59508903800) ;Al-Zamili, Ali F. (59508769200) ;Rhadí, Sabah H. (57454190300) ;Shaghee, Foaad K. (57220576182) ;Allevi, Massimiliano (57224514246) ;Arca, Marcello (57221100060) ;Atzori, Luigi (57217659469) ;Averna, Maurizio (7005411173) ;Banderali, Giuseppe (6602000083) ;Baratta, Francesco (55255658500) ;Bartuli, Andrea (6603317444) ;Bianconi, Vanessa (57188676466) ;Bini, Simone (57201773856) ;Bonomo, Katia (7801496516) ;Branchi, Adriana (7003906509) ;Bruzzi, Patrizia (25629356200) ;Bucci, Marco (7102860570) ;Buonuomo, Paola S. (6506121747) ;Calabrò, Paolo (23487676500) ;Calandra, Sebastiano (55400891500) ;Carubbi, Francesca (6603040572) ;Cásula, Manuela (36173674300) ;Catapano, Alberico L. (7006246941) ;Cavalot, Franco (7003923421) ;Cefalù, Angelo B. (35599640600) ;Cesaro, Arturo (57194680726) ;Cipollone, Francesco (7003611260) ;D'Addato, Sergio (55234172300) ;Pino, Beatrice Dal (55951501200) ;Del Ben, Maria (6603958939) ;Di Costanzo, Alessia (57219509223) ;Di Taranto, Maria D. (16304024300) ;Fasano, Tommaso (8590818600) ;Ferri, Claudio (7103090583) ;Fogacci, Federica (57194501765) ;Formisano, Elena (57217051763) ;Fortunato, Giuliana (57196995935) ;Galimberti, Federica (57203821025) ;Gentile, Marco (7101638352) ;Giammanco, Antonina (35224887100) ;Grigore, Liliana (8594005300) ;Iannuzzo, Gabriella (6603343179) ;Iughetti, Lorenzo (57193233990) ;Mandraffino, Giuseppe (24177375100) ;Mombelli, Giuliana (23480174800) ;Montalcini, Tiziana (15751108200) ;Morace, Carmela (8336316300) ;Muntoni, Sandro (7006257008) ;Nascimbeni, Fabio (57201454143) ;Notargiacomo, Serena (57231317200) ;Passaro, Angelina (57855886700) ;Pavanello, Chiara (55938335300) ;Pecchioli, Lorenzo (58616588400) ;Pecchioli, Valerio (6508341241) ;Pederiva, Cristina (18134025000) ;Pellegatta, Fabio (6603929326) ;Piro, Salvatore (57198420693) ;Pirro, Matteo (22036502300) ;Pisciotta, Livia (6602289161) ;Pujia, Arturo (55364090900) ;Rizzi, Luigi (57213146019) ;Romandini, Alessandra (57217287575) ;Sanz, Juana M. (7201668337) ;Sarzani, Riccardo (56243359900) ;Sbrana, Francesco (26647046700) ;Scicali, Roberto (55322163000) ;Suppressa, Patrizia (13204635900) ;Tarugi, Patrizia (7003807624) ;Trenti, Chiara (16640637900) ;Werba, José P. (6602175520) ;Zambon, Alberto (7006480504) ;Zambon, Sabina (6603729817) ;Zenti, Maria G. (6602739661) ;Harada-Shiba, Mariko (6701548781) ;Hori, Mika (36723824700) ;Ayesh, Mahmoud H. (55325132700) ;Azar, Sami T. (7005187997) ;Bitar, Fadi F. (35508040300) ;Fahed, Akl C. (36970454400) ;Moubarak, Elie M. (35115104000) ;Nemer, Georges (6603311286) ;Nawawi, Hapizah (57205880767) ;Madriz, Ramón (57453764700) ;Mehta, Roopa (56245541000) ;Hartgers, Merel L. (56922063800) ;Doortje Reijman, M. (59508846600) ;Stroes, Erik S.G. (7004092642) ;Wiegman, Albert (6602133943) ;Al-Waili, Khalid (57226209076) ;Sadiq, Fouzia (15754613500) ;Bourbon, Mafalda (15768833600) ;Gaspar, Isabel M. (57211384844) ;Ezhov, Marat V. (57218254057) ;Susekov, Andrey V. (6701673340) ;Lalic, Katarina S. (13702563300) ;Groselj, Urh (55181854900) ;Vallejo‐Vaz, Antonio J. (26027650300) ;Charng, Min-Ji (6602693593) ;Khovidhunkit, Weerapan (6602244403) ;Altunkeser, Bulent B. (6701853239) ;Demircioglu, Sinan (49861369200) ;Kose, Melis (55893744000) ;Gokce, Cumali (6602749481) ;Ilhan, Osman (7005816382) ;Kayikcioglu, Meral (57202353075) ;Kaynar, Leyla G. (25639501700) ;Kuku, Irfan (6603472555) ;Kurtoglu, Erdal (6603382478) ;Okutan, Harika (56960142100) ;Ozcebe, Osman I. (7004401160) ;Pekkolay, Zafer (54400143600) ;Sag, Saim (12140008100) ;Salcioglu, Osman Z. (57454053500) ;Temizhan, Ahmet (55874244400) ;Yenercag, Mustafa (56106040500) ;Yilmaz, Mehmet (59851414700) ;Yasar, Hamiyet Yilmaz (59157859300) ;Mitchenko, Olena (57193516360) ;Lyons, Alexander R.M. (57421169400) ;Ray, Kausik K. (35303190300) ;Stevens, Christophe A.T. (57158495900) ;Brothers, Julie A. (22978561700) ;Hudgins, Lisa C. (57207502354) ;Alieva, Rano (57203727293) ;Shek, Aleksandr (57205032006) ;Do, Doan-Loi (55445200400) ;Le, Hong-An (57205698009) ;Le, Thanh-Tung (57206658401) ;Nguyen, Mai-Ngoc T. (57202780931) ;Alareedh, Mohammed D. (57201524677) ;Baratta, Francesco (59685433400) ;Brother's, Julie A. (59508791600) ;Dal Pino, Beatrice (6506912761) ;Genest, Jacques (35350643100) ;Iughetti, Lorenzo (59905050200) ;Kaynar, Leyla G. (59696069700) ;Pang, Jing (59745506700)Sherman, Mark H. (7402148130)Importance: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic condition characterized by extremely increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is more common than HoFH, and women with HeFH are diagnosed later and undertreated compared to men; it is unknown whether these sex differences also apply to HoFH. Objective: To investigate sex differences in age at diagnosis, risk factors, lipid-lowering treatment, and ASCVD morbidity and mortality in patients with HoFH. Design, Setting, and Participants: Sex-specific analyses for this retrospective cohort study were performed using data from the HoFH International Clinical Collaborators (HICC) registry, the largest global dataset of patients with HoFH, spanning 88 institutions across 38 countries. Patients with HoFH who were alive during or after 2010 were eligible for inclusion. Data entry occurred between February 2016 and December 2020. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to June 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Comparison between women and men with HoFH regarding age at diagnosis, presence of risk factors, lipid-lowering treatment, prevalence, and onset and incidence of ASCVD morbidity (myocardial infarction [MI], aortic stenosis, and combined ASCVD outcomes) and mortality. Results: Data from 389 women and 362 men with HoFH from 38 countries were included. Women and men had similar age at diagnosis (median [IQR], 13 [6-26] years vs 11 [5-27] years, respectively), untreated LDL cholesterol levels (mean [SD], 579 [203] vs 596 [186] mg/dL, respectively), and cardiovascular risk factor prevalence, except smoking (38 of 266 women [14.3%] vs 59 of 217 men [27.2%], respectively). Prevalence of MI was lower in women (31 of 389 [8.0%]) than men (59 of 362 [16.3%]), but age at first MI was similar (mean [SD], 39 [13] years in women vs 38 [13] years in men). Treated LDL cholesterol levels and lipid-lowering therapy were similar in both sexes, in particular statins (248 of 276 women [89.9%] vs 235 of 258 men [91.1%]) and lipoprotein apheresis (115 of 317 women [36.3%] vs 118 of 304 men [38.8%]). Sixteen years after HoFH diagnosis, women had statistically significant lower cumulative incidence of MI (5.0% in women vs 13.7% in men; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.66) and nonsignificantly lower all-cause mortality (3.0% in women vs 4.1% in men; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.40-1.45) and cardiovascular mortality (2.6% in women vs 4.1% in men; SHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.44-1.75). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of individuals with known HoFH, MI was higher in men compared with women yet age at diagnosis and at first ASCVD event were similar. These findings suggest that early diagnosis and treatment are important in attenuating the excessive cardiovascular risk in both sexes.. © 2024 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.