Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Kosovac, Olivera (57191577661)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Acceptable adverse outcomes after delayed breast reconstruction using abdominal advancement flap - A 15-year experience
    (2016)
    Kosovac, Olivera (57191577661)
    ;
    Santrac, Nada (56016758000)
    ;
    Markovic, Ivan (7004033833)
    ;
    Gavrilovic, Dusica (8849698200)
    ;
    Martinovic, Aleksandar (56120118800)
    ;
    Jevric, Marko (43761174500)
    ;
    Spurnic, Igor (56613372800)
    ;
    Dzodic, Radan (6602410321)
    Purpose: To evaluate the adverse outcomes after delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) by abdominal advancement flap (AAF) and permanent prosthesis in patients treated with mastectomy due to unilateral breast carcinoma, as well as to determine which factors are predictive for their occurrence. Methods: The study included 155 patients operated at the Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia from 1996 to 2010. All patients had total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection, followed by specific oncological treatment. Patients were selected for DBR after complete diagnostic evaluation. Adverse events were evaluated in regard to patient, disease and prostheses-related factors. Results: During follow-up, DBR adverse events were observed in 23.23% of the patients - the majority (91.67%) had only one. The most frequent was capsule contracture (47.22%), followed by asymmetry (22.22%), infection (16.67%) and prosthesis rupture (16.67%). There were isolated cases of prosthesis prolapse and local disease recurrence. Infections were treated conservatively in all but one patient. Other events were managed by additional operation. Statistical analysis showed that complications occurred significantly more often in patients ≥51 years (vs 18-40, vs 41-50), disease stage IIb (vs Ia), T2 (vs TI) tumors and adjuvant radiotherapy (vs without). Prostheses-related factors were not significant for DBR complications, neither body mass index (BMI), nor smoking habits. Conclusions: DBR using AAF and permanent prosthesis is a safe technique with acceptable complication rate. It provides one-time surgery with satisfactory aesthetic results and good postoperative recovery. Most frequent complication is capsule contracture. Patients' age and irradiation of the chest wall after mastectomy are predictive factors for complications.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Acceptable adverse outcomes after delayed breast reconstruction using abdominal advancement flap - A 15-year experience
    (2016)
    Kosovac, Olivera (57191577661)
    ;
    Santrac, Nada (56016758000)
    ;
    Markovic, Ivan (7004033833)
    ;
    Gavrilovic, Dusica (8849698200)
    ;
    Martinovic, Aleksandar (56120118800)
    ;
    Jevric, Marko (43761174500)
    ;
    Spurnic, Igor (56613372800)
    ;
    Dzodic, Radan (6602410321)
    Purpose: To evaluate the adverse outcomes after delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) by abdominal advancement flap (AAF) and permanent prosthesis in patients treated with mastectomy due to unilateral breast carcinoma, as well as to determine which factors are predictive for their occurrence. Methods: The study included 155 patients operated at the Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia from 1996 to 2010. All patients had total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection, followed by specific oncological treatment. Patients were selected for DBR after complete diagnostic evaluation. Adverse events were evaluated in regard to patient, disease and prostheses-related factors. Results: During follow-up, DBR adverse events were observed in 23.23% of the patients - the majority (91.67%) had only one. The most frequent was capsule contracture (47.22%), followed by asymmetry (22.22%), infection (16.67%) and prosthesis rupture (16.67%). There were isolated cases of prosthesis prolapse and local disease recurrence. Infections were treated conservatively in all but one patient. Other events were managed by additional operation. Statistical analysis showed that complications occurred significantly more often in patients ≥51 years (vs 18-40, vs 41-50), disease stage IIb (vs Ia), T2 (vs TI) tumors and adjuvant radiotherapy (vs without). Prostheses-related factors were not significant for DBR complications, neither body mass index (BMI), nor smoking habits. Conclusions: DBR using AAF and permanent prosthesis is a safe technique with acceptable complication rate. It provides one-time surgery with satisfactory aesthetic results and good postoperative recovery. Most frequent complication is capsule contracture. Patients' age and irradiation of the chest wall after mastectomy are predictive factors for complications.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback