Browsing by Author "Kocijancic, Dusica (37031231300)"

Objectives: There is an ongoing debate regarding the routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy. The study aim was to investigate if episiotomy during vaginal deliveries can reduce both, the number and severity of genital lacerations. Material and methods: The study included all women who gave vaginal birth at AOU. "G. Martino" Messina (n=382) and the Clinic for Ob/Gyn Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade (n=4221) during 2011. Lacerations during birth were recorded and divided according to location and severity. Women with lacerations were subdivided into two groups: with or without medio-lateral episiotomy. We assessed potential risk factors for laceration: maternal age, parity, use of labor stimulants and epidural analgesia, participation in antenatal classes, fetal presentation, neonatal birth weight, and duration of the second stage of labor. Results: Older women had higher grade perineum or combined lacerations. Children with higher birth weight in occipito-posterior presentation caused higher grade lacerations. Performance of episiotomy was connected with fewer perineum and labial lacerations. There were no differences in laceration grade between patients with and without episiotomy. Assessed parameters proved to be good discriminating factors between lacerations sites. According to logistic regression, laceration site was the most important risk factor for laceration grade. Combined lacerations had the highest grade. Conclusions: Episiotomy can significantly reduce the number of genital lacerations, but it does not influence laceration grade. Advanced maternal age, higher parity, occipito-posterior presentation and fetal macrosomia can cause lacerations during vaginal birth. Therefore, we suggest analysis of maternal and fetal factors to prevent widespread genital lacerations. © Polskie Towarzys two Ginekologiczne.

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of ultrasound scan (US) findings in the preoperative assessment of the nature of adnexal masses infernales. Methods: After detailed history, a preoperative US examination was performed in all women. Tumor diameter, localization, the presence of solid, cystic and multilocular components, excrescences, metastasis and free fluid were assessed. Doppler scan was done and pulsatility (PI) and resistance indices (RI) were determined. These data were compared with postoperatively obtained histopathological findings and statistically analyzed. Results: The study included 609 women out of which 20.7% had malignant, 73.7% benign, and 5.6% borderline tumors. Patients with malignant tumors were oldest (p<0.001). There were significantly more positive US parameters in malignant than in benign tumors (p<0.001). Also, there were significant differences (p<0.001) between malignant, benign and borderline tumors regarding all examined US and Doppler parameters except tumor multilocularity. RI had sensitivity 75%, specificity 61.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) 42.70% and negative predictive value (NPV) 96.16%. PI had sensitivity 50%, specificity 35.3%, PPV 8.37% and NPV 25.93%. Sensitivity of US characteristics was 94.34%, specificity 30.62%, PPV 22.27% and NPV 96.25%. Conclusions: US pattern characteristics and Doppler parameters were found to be moderately reliable in discriminating malignant, benign and borderline adnexal tumors. Tumor of solid or mixed consistency, presence of ascites and excrescences were the best predictors of malignancy.

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of ultrasound scan (US) findings in the preoperative assessment of the nature of adnexal masses infernales. Methods: After detailed history, a preoperative US examination was performed in all women. Tumor diameter, localization, the presence of solid, cystic and multilocular components, excrescences, metastasis and free fluid were assessed. Doppler scan was done and pulsatility (PI) and resistance indices (RI) were determined. These data were compared with postoperatively obtained histopathological findings and statistically analyzed. Results: The study included 609 women out of which 20.7% had malignant, 73.7% benign, and 5.6% borderline tumors. Patients with malignant tumors were oldest (p<0.001). There were significantly more positive US parameters in malignant than in benign tumors (p<0.001). Also, there were significant differences (p<0.001) between malignant, benign and borderline tumors regarding all examined US and Doppler parameters except tumor multilocularity. RI had sensitivity 75%, specificity 61.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) 42.70% and negative predictive value (NPV) 96.16%. PI had sensitivity 50%, specificity 35.3%, PPV 8.37% and NPV 25.93%. Sensitivity of US characteristics was 94.34%, specificity 30.62%, PPV 22.27% and NPV 96.25%. Conclusions: US pattern characteristics and Doppler parameters were found to be moderately reliable in discriminating malignant, benign and borderline adnexal tumors. Tumor of solid or mixed consistency, presence of ascites and excrescences were the best predictors of malignancy.