Browsing by Author "Karapandzic, Vesna Plesinac (36092731000)"

Purpose: To analyze the dose distribution achieved during 2D radiography-based brachytherapy (BRT) planning, by using a 3D MRI-based BRT replanning evaluation, in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma, treated with definitive concomitant chemoradiation (CCRT). Methods: The curative CCRT was applied to 30 patients with advanced cervical carcinoma. For each patient, 2D radiography-based planning and a 3D MRI-based BRT replanning were performed. Applying the same source positions and dwell times in both planning methods, it was possible to use the MRI replanning to evaluate the dose distribution, maximum organs at risk (OAR) doses and target volume coverage, that was obtained during 2D BRT planning. Results: A statistically significant difference for bladder and rectum maximum doses, between 2D planning (Bmax, Rmax) and 3D replanning (D0.1ccm, D1ccm, D2ccm) was found, except between Bmax and bladder D2ccm dose (p=0.07), and Rmax and rectal D2ccm dose in the group of patients with symmetrical rectum position regarding the applicator system (p=0.47). MRI evaluation of the HR-CTV volume, according to the 2D planning achieved dose distribution, revealed total EQD2 HR-CTV doses: D90 (107.15±22.06 Gy) and D100 (80.66±14.58 Gy). Conclusion: 2D radiography-based BRT planning can provide a good estimation for the bladder and rectum 3D D2ccm dose with a significant statistical difference for the doses in the smaller OAR volumes (D0.1ccm, D1ccm). Inability to visualize tumor tissue during 2D BRT planning provides no option in tailoring the dose distribution to the tumor volume and patient anatomy, leading to potential under/over-treatment in some patients. © This work by JBUON is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Purpose: To analyze the dose distribution achieved during 2D radiography-based brachytherapy (BRT) planning, by using a 3D MRI-based BRT replanning evaluation, in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma, treated with definitive concomitant chemoradiation (CCRT). Methods: The curative CCRT was applied to 30 patients with advanced cervical carcinoma. For each patient, 2D radiography-based planning and a 3D MRI-based BRT replanning were performed. Applying the same source positions and dwell times in both planning methods, it was possible to use the MRI replanning to evaluate the dose distribution, maximum organs at risk (OAR) doses and target volume coverage, that was obtained during 2D BRT planning. Results: A statistically significant difference for bladder and rectum maximum doses, between 2D planning (Bmax, Rmax) and 3D replanning (D0.1ccm, D1ccm, D2ccm) was found, except between Bmax and bladder D2ccm dose (p=0.07), and Rmax and rectal D2ccm dose in the group of patients with symmetrical rectum position regarding the applicator system (p=0.47). MRI evaluation of the HR-CTV volume, according to the 2D planning achieved dose distribution, revealed total EQD2 HR-CTV doses: D90 (107.15±22.06 Gy) and D100 (80.66±14.58 Gy). Conclusion: 2D radiography-based BRT planning can provide a good estimation for the bladder and rectum 3D D2ccm dose with a significant statistical difference for the doses in the smaller OAR volumes (D0.1ccm, D1ccm). Inability to visualize tumor tissue during 2D BRT planning provides no option in tailoring the dose distribution to the tumor volume and patient anatomy, leading to potential under/over-treatment in some patients. © This work by JBUON is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Background: Historically, the treatment of choice for anal cancer had been abdominoperineal resection (APR). Radical radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil plus mitomycin C chemotherapy was later established as standard therapy, although with a failure rate of 20-30%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes after radical chemoradiotherapy (CRT), prognostic and predictive factors and patterns of failure. Patients and methods: This study included 47 patients treated with radical CRT for patohistologicaly confirmed anal squamous cell carcinoma. Analysed haematological parameters included: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and haemoglobin level. The final logistic regression model included treatment break period. Tumour response was assessed at 24 weeks from CRT completion. Follow-up was performed every 3 months during the first two years, and every 6 months thereafter. Results: A complete clinical response (CR) was detected in 30 patients (63.8%). Patients who did not achieve a 6-months CR and those who had a CR after 6 months but then relapsed were referred to surgical treatment. With combined CRT and surgical salvage treatment the CR rate was 80.9%. Patients with CR after 6 months had significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A significant effect on the 6-month response was confirmed for PLR (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Important prognostic factors associated with CR were baseline haemoglobin level and period of treatment interruptions. Potential haematological prognostic factors could be PLR and NLR, which can be routinely determined by low-cost and minimally invasive methods. © 2021 Suzana Stojanovic-Rundic, Mladen Marinkovic, Milena Cavic, Vesna Plesinac Karapandzic, Dusica Gavrilovic, Radmila Jankovic, Richarda M. de Voer, Sergi Castellvi-Bel, Zoran Krivokapic, published by Sciendo.