Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Jovanović, Dejana R. (55419203900)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Is there a difference between GBS triggered by COVID-19 and those of other origins?
    (2022)
    Radišić, Vanja (57357745200)
    ;
    Ždraljević, Mirjana (57357620400)
    ;
    Perić, Stojan (35750481700)
    ;
    Mladenović, Branka (57216509488)
    ;
    Ralić, Branislav (57724548600)
    ;
    Jovanović, Dejana R. (55419203900)
    ;
    Berisavac, Ivana (6507392420)
    Background: Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an increasing number of Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) cases following the infection has been reported. The aim of our study was to detect patients with GBS treated in our hospital over a 1-year period and to compare the characteristics and outcomes of those triggered by COVID-19 with the rest of GBS patients. Our prospective study included 29 patients who were diagnosed with GBS from March 2020 to March 2021. Based on the preceding event, patients were stratified as post-COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. The GBS disability scale (GDS) was used to assess functional disability. Results: We identified 10 (34.5%) patients with post-COVID-19 GBS and 19 (65.5%) patients with non-COVID-19 GBS. The median time from the preceding event to the symptoms onset was longer in post-COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 GBS patients (p = 0.04). However, the time from the symptom onset to the nadir did not differ (p = 0.12). GDS at admission, as well as at nadir, did not differ between these two groups. The level of proteinorrachia was higher in post-COVID-19 GBS patients (p = 0.035). The most frequent subtype of GBS in both groups was acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP). GDS score at discharge (p = 0.56) did not differ between two study groups. Conclusions: There was no difference in clinical and electrophysiological features, disease course, and outcome in post-COVID-19 compared with non-COVID-19 GBS patients. © 2022, The Author(s).
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Is there a difference between GBS triggered by COVID-19 and those of other origins?
    (2022)
    Radišić, Vanja (57357745200)
    ;
    Ždraljević, Mirjana (57357620400)
    ;
    Perić, Stojan (35750481700)
    ;
    Mladenović, Branka (57216509488)
    ;
    Ralić, Branislav (57724548600)
    ;
    Jovanović, Dejana R. (55419203900)
    ;
    Berisavac, Ivana (6507392420)
    Background: Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an increasing number of Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) cases following the infection has been reported. The aim of our study was to detect patients with GBS treated in our hospital over a 1-year period and to compare the characteristics and outcomes of those triggered by COVID-19 with the rest of GBS patients. Our prospective study included 29 patients who were diagnosed with GBS from March 2020 to March 2021. Based on the preceding event, patients were stratified as post-COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. The GBS disability scale (GDS) was used to assess functional disability. Results: We identified 10 (34.5%) patients with post-COVID-19 GBS and 19 (65.5%) patients with non-COVID-19 GBS. The median time from the preceding event to the symptoms onset was longer in post-COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 GBS patients (p = 0.04). However, the time from the symptom onset to the nadir did not differ (p = 0.12). GDS at admission, as well as at nadir, did not differ between these two groups. The level of proteinorrachia was higher in post-COVID-19 GBS patients (p = 0.035). The most frequent subtype of GBS in both groups was acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP). GDS score at discharge (p = 0.56) did not differ between two study groups. Conclusions: There was no difference in clinical and electrophysiological features, disease course, and outcome in post-COVID-19 compared with non-COVID-19 GBS patients. © 2022, The Author(s).
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Long-Term Prognosis in Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy
    (2017)
    Stefanovic Budimkic, Maja (54406292600)
    ;
    Pekmezovic, Tatjana (7003989932)
    ;
    Beslac-Bumbasirevic, Ljiljana (6506489179)
    ;
    Ercegovac, Marko (7006226257)
    ;
    Berisavac, Ivana (6507392420)
    ;
    Stanarcevic, Predrag (55353773400)
    ;
    Padjen, Visnja (55605274200)
    ;
    Jovanović, Dejana R. (55419203900)
    Background and Purpose It remains unclear if intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator has an impact on the survival and maintenance of a favorable effect on functional recovery over a long follow-up period. The aim of this study was to assess whether or not IVT treatment has a favorable effect on functional recovery and survival less than 1 year after a stroke. Methods This matched cohort study included 259 patients with acute ischemic stroke (IS) who were treated with IVT and standard care and 259 patients treated with standard care alone in the stroke unit between February 2006 and January 2013. Results After a median follow-up period of 3 years (range, 1-7 years), survival did not differ significantly between the groups; specifically, 56 patients (21.6%) in the thrombolysed group died versus 62 patients (23.94%) in the nonthrombolysed group (log-rank, .240, P = .624). Based on a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, older age (>70 years), stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥ 15), diabetes mellitus, and a history of atrial fibrillation were independent predictors of long-term mortality after stroke. After the follow-up period, 144 patients (55.6%) in the IVT-treated group versus 112 patients (43.2%) in the control group had an excellent outcome, with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-2.32). Based on a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, an excellent 3-month functional recovery was a strong predictor of favorable outcome (HR = 11.27, 95% CI = 6.45-19.63). Conclusion The results suggest that IVT for acute IS has a favorable effect on functional recovery more than 1 year after stroke. © 2017 National Stroke Association
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Recurrent ischemic stroke associated with sildenafil and tadalafil use in a young adult
    (2012)
    Stefanović-Budimkić, Maja (54406292600)
    ;
    Jovanović, Dejana R. (55419203900)
    ;
    Beslać-Bumbaširević, Ljiljana (6506489179)
    ;
    Ercegovac, Marko D. (7006226257)
    [No abstract available]
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Successful intravenous thrombolysis in a stroke patient with hemiballism
    (2011)
    Zidverc-Trajković, Jasna (18134546100)
    ;
    Jovanović, Dejana R. (55419203900)
    ;
    Marjanović, Ivan (57201599576)
    ;
    Radojičić, Aleksandra (25122016700)
    ;
    Beslać-Bumbaširević, Ljiljana (6506489179)
    INTRODUCTION: Hemiballism (HB) is a relatively rare hyperkinetic disorder commonly caused by an acute stroke. Such patients usually receive symptomatic therapy with limited effect. We report the case of an acute stroke patient with HB who was successfully treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA). CASE REPORT: A 67-year-old man with a history of hypertension and ischemic coronary heart disease presented in the emergency room 85 minutes after sudden onset of involuntary coarse flinging movements of the left arm and leg. Neurological investigation revealed oromandibular dyskinesia; left blepharospasm; dyskinetic movements of the head and neck; dysarthria; and forceful, jerky, irregular, flinging, large-amplitude involuntary movements involving his left arm and left leg. Initial brain computed tomography showed only mild confluent periventricular hypodensities in the vicinity of the frontal horns. The calculated National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 1, for dysarthria. The sudden onset of HB, however, suggested an acute stroke and we decided to treat the patient with intravenous rtPA. Thrombolytic therapy with rtPA began 200 minutes after symptom onset, and after the patient's increased arterial blood pressure was resolved. Follow-up examination performed 12 hours after therapy revealed only mild dysarthria; mild ataxia of the left arm, and ataxic gait. Delayed brain computed tomography did not indicate recent ischemia, although a fluid attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging sequence revealed high signal intensity lesions in the vicinity of the right putamen and left cerebellar hemisphere. After 1 month, a follow-up examination revealed only mild dysarthria and mild ataxia of the left arm. CONCLUSIONS: Acute stroke patients with low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, including patients with HB, should be considered as candidates for thrombolytic treatment. Copyright © 2011 by Lippincott Williams &Wilkins.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback