Browsing by Author "Hodzic, Alenka (55624829000)"

Purpose: We sought to determine the analytical sensitivity of several extended exome variation analysis approaches in terms of their contribution to diagnostic yield and their clinical feasibility. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the results of genetic testing in 1,059 distinct cases referred for exome sequencing to our institution. In these, we routinely employed extended exome analysis approaches in addition to basic variant analysis, including (i) copy-number variation (CNV) detection, (ii) nonconsensus splice defect detection, (ii) genomic breakpoint detection, (iv) homozygosity mapping, and (v) mitochondrial variant analysis. Results: Extended exome analysis approaches assisted in identification of causative genetic variant in 44 cases, which represented a 4.2% increase in diagnostic yield. The greatest contribution was associated with CNV analysis (1.8%) and splice variant prediction (1.2%), and the remaining approaches contributed an additional 1.2%. Analysis of workload has shown that on average nine additional variants per case had to be interpreted in the extended analysis. Conclusion: We show that extended exome analysis approaches improve the diagnostic yield of heterogeneous genetic disorders and result in considerable increase of diagnostic yield of exome sequencing with a minor increase of interpretative workload. © 2018 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Purpose: In recent years, many genes have been associated with male infertility; however, testing of monogenic forms has not yet been clinically implemented in the diagnosis of severe forms of idiopathic male infertility, as the diagnostic utility has not been established yet. The aim of this study was therefore to answer if the implementation of genetic testing for monogenic forms of male infertility could contribute to the clinical diagnosis of men with severe forms of idiopathic male infertility. Materials and Methods: Based on the ClinGene curation protocol, we defined a panel of genes with sufficient evidence for the involvement with severe male infertility. We tested the 21-gene panel in a representative multicentric cohort of men with significantly impaired spermatogenesis. We performed whole exome sequencing on 191 infertile men with severe forms of idiopathic male infertility; non-obstructive azoospermia, and severe oligozoospermia (<5 million spermatozoa/mL). The control group consisted of 216 men who fathered a child. DNA was prepared based on the Twist CORE exome protocol and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. Variants were classified using the Association for Clinical Genomic Science (ACGS) Best Practice Guidelines for Variant Classification in Rare Disease 2020. Results: We identified potential monogenic disease-causing variants in four infertile men. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in STAG3 (c.2776C>T, p.Arg926*; c.2817delG, p.Leu940fs), MSH4 (c.1392delG, p.Ile465fs; c.2261C>T, p.Ser754Leu), TEX15 (c.6848_6849delGA, p.Arg2283fs; c.6271dupA, p.Arg2091fs), and TEX14 (c.1021C>T, p.Arg341*) genes were found. Conclusions: In the present multicentric cohort study, a monogenic cause in 2.1% of infertile men was identified. These findings confirm the utility of monogenic testing and suggest the clinical use of monogenic testing for men with severe forms of idiopathic male infertility. Copyright © 2025 Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology.

Purpose: In recent years, many genes have been associated with male infertility; however, testing of monogenic forms has not yet been clinically implemented in the diagnosis of severe forms of idiopathic male infertility, as the diagnostic utility has not been established yet. The aim of this study was therefore to answer if the implementation of genetic testing for monogenic forms of male infertility could contribute to the clinical diagnosis of men with severe forms of idiopathic male infertility. Materials and Methods: Based on the ClinGene curation protocol, we defined a panel of genes with sufficient evidence for the involvement with severe male infertility. We tested the 21-gene panel in a representative multicentric cohort of men with significantly impaired spermatogenesis. We performed whole exome sequencing on 191 infertile men with severe forms of idiopathic male infertility; non-obstructive azoospermia, and severe oligozoospermia (<5 million spermatozoa/mL). The control group consisted of 216 men who fathered a child. DNA was prepared based on the Twist CORE exome protocol and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. Variants were classified using the Association for Clinical Genomic Science (ACGS) Best Practice Guidelines for Variant Classification in Rare Disease 2020. Results: We identified potential monogenic disease-causing variants in four infertile men. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in STAG3 (c.2776C>T, p.Arg926*; c.2817delG, p.Leu940fs), MSH4 (c.1392delG, p.Ile465fs; c.2261C>T, p.Ser754Leu), TEX15 (c.6848_6849delGA, p.Arg2283fs; c.6271dupA, p.Arg2091fs), and TEX14 (c.1021C>T, p.Arg341*) genes were found. Conclusions: In the present multicentric cohort study, a monogenic cause in 2.1% of infertile men was identified. These findings confirm the utility of monogenic testing and suggest the clinical use of monogenic testing for men with severe forms of idiopathic male infertility. Copyright © 2025 Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology.