Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Hartmann, Daniel (57197985481)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Surgical Oncology in Europe: Results of a European Survey
    (2021)
    Stöss, Christian (56823517700)
    ;
    Steffani, Marcella (57204695039)
    ;
    Pergolini, Ilaria (56462901200)
    ;
    Hartmann, Daniel (57197985481)
    ;
    Radenkovic, Dejan (6603592685)
    ;
    Novotny, Alexander (55616259800)
    ;
    Friess, Helmut (36049095700)
    ;
    Müller, Michael W. (56431396900)
    Background: The first COVID-19 pandemic wave hit most of the health-care systems worldwide. The present survey aimed to provide a European overview on the COVID-19 impact on surgical oncology. Methods: This anonymous online survey was accessible from April 24 to May 11, 2020, for surgeons (n = 298) who were contacted by the surgical society European Digestive Surgery. The survey was completed by 88 surgeons (29.2%) from 69 different departments. The responses per department were evaluated. Results: Of the departments, 88.4% (n = 61/69) reported a lower volume of patients in the outpatient clinic; 69.1% (n = 47/68) and 75.0% (n = 51/68) reported a reduction in hospital bed and the operating room capacity, respectively. As a result, the participants reported an average reduction of 29.3% for all types of oncological resections surveyed in this questionnaire. The strongest reduction was observed for oncological resections of hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) cancers. Of the interviewed surgeons, 68.7% (n = 46/67) agreed that survival outcomes will be negatively impacted by the pandemic. Conclusion: The first COVID-19 pandemic wave had a significant impact on surgical oncology in Europe. The surveyed surgeons expect an increase in the number of unresectable cancers as well as poorer survival outcomes due to cancellations of follow-ups and postponements of surgeries. © 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel. Copyright: All rights reserved.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Neoadjuvant Treatment for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    (2019)
    Kaufmann, Benedikt (57190254240)
    ;
    Hartmann, Daniel (57197985481)
    ;
    D'haese, Jan G. (7003691437)
    ;
    Stupakov, Pavel (57201297028)
    ;
    Radenkovic, Dejan (6603592685)
    ;
    Gloor, Beat (35840084000)
    ;
    Friess, Helmut (36049095700)
    One of the main reasons for the dismal prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is its late diagnosis. At the time of presentation, only approximately 15-20% of all patients with PDAC are considered resectable and around 30% are considered borderline resectable. A surgical approach, which is the only curative option, is limited in borderline resectable patients by local involvement of surrounding structures. In borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), neoadjuvant treatment regimens have been introduced with the rationale to downstage and downsize the tumor in order to enable resection and eliminate -microscopic distant metastases. However, there are no official guidelines for the preoperative treatment of BRPC. In the majority of cases, patients are administered -Gemcitabine-based or FOLFIRINOX-based chemotherapy regimens with or without radiation. Radiologic restaging after neoadjuvant therapy has to be judged with caution when it comes to predict tumor response and resectability, since inflammation induced by neoadjuvant therapy may mimic solid tumor. Patients who do not show any disease progression during neoadjuvant therapy should be offered surgical exploration, since a high percentage is likely to undergo resection with negative margins (R0) and, thus, achieve improved overall survival although imaging judged it unlikely. Despite the promising new approaches of neoadjuvant treatment regimens during the last 2 decades, surgery remains the first choice if the tumor appears to be primary resectable at the time of diagnosis. At present, there are no international guidelines regarding the preoperative treatment of BRPC. Therefore, in order to standardize and adjust neoadjuvant treatment in the future, new guidelines have to be determined on the basis of upcoming prospective randomized studies. © 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback