Browsing by Author "Hénon, Hilde (7003850368)"

Purpose The Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP) collaboration was a concerted effort initiated in 2010 with the purpose to address relevant research questions about the effectiveness and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). The collaboration also aims to prospectively collect data on patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) and hence the name of the collaboration was changed from TRISP to EVA-TRISP. The methodology of the former TRISP registry for patients treated with IVT has already been published. This paper focuses on describing the EVT part of the registry. Participants All centres committed to collecting predefined variables on consecutive patients prospectively. We aim for accuracy and completeness of the data and to adapt local databases to investigate novel research questions. Herein, we introduce the methodology of a recently constructed academic investigator-initiated open collaboration EVT registry built as an extension of an existing IVT registry in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Findings to date Currently, the EVA-TRISP network includes 20 stroke centres with considerable expertise in EVT and maintenance of high-quality hospital-based registries. Following several successful randomised controlled trials (RCTs), many important clinical questions remain unanswered in the (EVT) field and some of them will unlikely be investigated in future RCTs. Prospective registries with high-quality data on EVT-treated patients may help answering some of these unanswered issues, especially on safety and efficacy of EVT in specific patient subgroups. Future plans This collaborative effort aims at addressing clinically important questions on safety and efficacy of EVT in conditions not covered by RCTs. The TRISP registry generated substantial novel data supporting stroke physicians in their daily decision making considering IVT candidate patients. While providing observational data on EVT in daily clinical practice, our future findings may likewise be hypothesis generating for future research as well as for quality improvement (on EVT). The collaboration welcomes participation of further centres willing to fulfill the commitment and the outlined requirements. © 2021 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Background/Aims: Thrombolysis for myocardial infarction is more effective in smokers. Our aim wasto determine whether smokers treated by intravenous (i.v.) rt-PA for acute cerebral ischemia have better outcomes. Method: Comparison of smokers and non-smokers for baseline characteristics and month-3 outcome in patients treated by i.v. rt-PA for cerebral ischemia in Lille, France, and Belgrade, Serbia. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-1 or similar to the pre-stroke mRS. Secondary outcomes were an mRS 0-2 and death. Results: We included 459 patients (255 men; median age 65 years, interquartile range 52-76; 135 smokers). Smokers were younger (median 53 vs. 70 years, p < 0.0001) and had less severe strokes (median NIHSS 10 vs. 14, p < 0.0001). At month 3, they were more likely to have an mRS 0-1 [odds ratio (OR) 1.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.62], or an mRS 0-2 (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.86-4.52) and less likely to be dead (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.61). Smoking was not independently associated with outcome after adjustment for case mix [adjusted OR ( adjOR) 0.86; 95% CI 0.52-1.43]. Conclusion: Smoking does not independently influence the outcome in patients treated by rt-PA for cerebral ischemia. The better outcome in smokers is the consequence of differences in case mix. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Background/Aims: Thrombolysis for myocardial infarction is more effective in smokers. Our aim wasto determine whether smokers treated by intravenous (i.v.) rt-PA for acute cerebral ischemia have better outcomes. Method: Comparison of smokers and non-smokers for baseline characteristics and month-3 outcome in patients treated by i.v. rt-PA for cerebral ischemia in Lille, France, and Belgrade, Serbia. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-1 or similar to the pre-stroke mRS. Secondary outcomes were an mRS 0-2 and death. Results: We included 459 patients (255 men; median age 65 years, interquartile range 52-76; 135 smokers). Smokers were younger (median 53 vs. 70 years, p < 0.0001) and had less severe strokes (median NIHSS 10 vs. 14, p < 0.0001). At month 3, they were more likely to have an mRS 0-1 [odds ratio (OR) 1.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.62], or an mRS 0-2 (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.86-4.52) and less likely to be dead (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.61). Smoking was not independently associated with outcome after adjustment for case mix [adjusted OR ( adjOR) 0.86; 95% CI 0.52-1.43]. Conclusion: Smoking does not independently influence the outcome in patients treated by rt-PA for cerebral ischemia. The better outcome in smokers is the consequence of differences in case mix. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.