Browsing by Author "Grygier, Marek (55984464600)"

Many patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are in need of stroke prevention are not treated with oral anticoagulation or discontinue treatment shortly after its initiation. Despite the availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such undertreatment has improved somewhat but is still evident. This is due to continued risks of bleeding events or ischemic strokes while on DOAC, poor treatment compliance, or aversion to anticoagulant therapy. Because of significant improvements in procedural safety over the years left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), using a catheter-based, device implantation approach, is increasingly favored for the prevention of thromboembolic events in AF patients who cannot have long-term oral anticoagulation. This article is an executive summary of a practical guide recently published by an international expert consensus group, which introduces the LAAC devices and briefly explains the implantation technique. The indications and device follow-up are more comprehensively described. This practical guide, aligned with published guideline/guidance, is aimed at those non-implanting physicians who may need to refer patients for consideration of LAAC. © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Introduction. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the major cause of stroke, particularly in older patients over 75 years of age. European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend chronic anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation if CHA2DS2-VASc score is ≥ 1 [CHA2DS2-VASc score for estimating the risk of stroke in patients with nonrheumatic AF consisting of the first letters of patients condition: C – congestive heart failure; H – hypertension; A2 – age ≥ 75 years; D – diabetes mellitus; S2 – prior stroke, transitory ischaemic attack (TIA) or thrombolism; V – vascular disease; A – age 65–74 years; Sc – sex category]. However, a significant number of patients have a high bleeding risk, or are contraindicated for chronic oral anticoagulation, and present a group of patients in whom alternative treatment options for thromboembolic prevention are required. Transcatheter percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) devices have been recommended in patients with contraindications for chronic anticoagulant therapy. Case report. We present our first three patients with nonvalvular AF and contraindications for chronic anticoagulant therapy who were successfully treated with implantation of LAAC Watchman device in Catheterization Laboratory of the Clinic for Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade Conclusion. Our initial results with Watchman LAAC device are promising and encouraging, providing real alternative in patients with non-valvular AF and contraindication for chronic anticoagulant therapy and high bleeding risk. © 2017, Institut za Vojnomedicinske Naucne Informacije/Documentaciju. All rights reserved.

A significant proportion of patients who suffer from atrial fibrillation (AF) and are in need of thromboembolic protection are not treated with oral anticoagulation or discontinue this treatment shortly after its initiation. This undertreatment has not improved sufficiently despite the availability of direct oral anticoagulants which are associated with less major bleeding than vitamin K antagonists. Multiple reasons account for this, including bleeding events or ischaemic strokes whilst on anticoagulation, a serious risk of bleeding events, poor treatment compliance despite best educational attempts, or aversion to drug therapy. An alternative interventional therapy, which is not associated with long-term bleeding and is as effective as vitamin K anticoagulation, was introduced over 20 years ago. Because of significant improvements in procedural safety over the years, left atrial appendage closure, predominantly achieved using a catheter-based, device implantation approach, is increasingly favoured for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients who cannot achieve effective anticoagulation. This management strategy is well known to the interventional cardiologist/electrophysiologist but is not more widely appreciated within cardiology or internal medicine. This article introduces the devices and briefly explains the implantation technique. The indications and device follow-up are more comprehensively described. Almost all physicians who care for adult patients will have many with AF. This practical guide, written within guideline/guidance boundaries, is aimed at those non-implanting physicians who may need to refer patients for consideration of this new therapy, which is becoming increasingly popular. © The Author(s) 2024.