Browsing by Author "Green, David (57203230018)"

Introduction/Objective Spinal anesthesia (SA) for cesarean section may lead to significant changes in hemodynamic parameters, especially hypotension. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the efficacy and safety of preemptive infusion protocols of the two most commonly used vasopressors, ephedrine (Group E, n = 29) and phenylephrine (Group P, n = 31) not only on prevention of hypotension but also to determine their effect on hemodynamic parameters, such as stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) using a continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitor. Methods The infusion of ephedrine was administered at the rate of 5 mg/min. immediately after SA. Phenylephrine was administered at an infusion rate of 25 μg/min for two minutes prior to SA. Results In Group E, mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) were similar to baseline. CO was higher (p < 0.001), while systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was lower than baseline (p < 0.001). In Group P, mean SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were lower than baseline, respectively (p = 0.006, p < 0.001). SBP, DBP, CO, SV, SVR, and HR were significantly different between the E and P groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion E and P vasopressors are both effective in the prevention of hypotension during SA. © 2020, Serbia Medical Society. All rights reserved.

Introduction/Objective Despite frequent side effects such as hypotension, spinal anesthesia (SA) is still one of the best anesthetic methods for elective cesarean section (CS). Intermittent, oscillometric, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (NIBP) frequently leads to missed hypotensive episodes. The objective was to compare continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitoring with NIBP in the terms of efficiency to detect hypotension. Methods In this study, we compared CNAP and NIBP monitoring for hypotension detection in 76 patients divided into two groups of 38 patients treated with ephedrine (E) or phenylephrine (P), during three-minute intervals, starting from SA, by the end of the surgery. Results In E group, significantly lower mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) values with CNAP compared with NIBP (p = 0.008) was detected. By monitoring CNAP, we detected 31 (81.6%) hypotensive patients in E group and significantly lower number, 20 (52.6%), with NIBP (p = 0.001), while in P group CNAP detected 34 patients (89.5%) and NIBP only 18 (47.3%), p = 0.001. By monitoring CNAP, we detected significantly higher number of hypotensive intervals in E and P groups (p < 0.001). Umbilical vein pH was lower within hypotensive compared with normotensive patients in E and P groups, with CNAP and NIBP, respectively (p < 0.001, p = 0.027 in E, and p = 0.009, p < 0.001, in P group). Conclusion CNAP is more efficient in hypotension detection for CS during SA, which allows faster treatment of hypotension, thus improving fetal and maternal outcome. © 2021, Serbia Medical Society. All rights reserved.