Browsing by Author "Frati, Giacomo (7003602863)"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery(2018) ;Gaudino, Mario (7005592319) ;Benedetto, Umberto (13906087500) ;Fremes, Stephen (7005370948) ;Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe (57209103657) ;Sedrakyan, Art (55207402200) ;Puskas, John D. (7004277063) ;Angelini, Gianni D. (36050606200) ;Buxton, Brian (7101750784) ;Frati, Giacomo (7003602863) ;Hare, David L. (7102709050) ;Hayward, Philip (17134822400) ;Nasso, Giuseppe (6602872975) ;Moat, Neil (57207515942) ;Peric, Miodrag (7006618529) ;Yoo, Kyung J. (7202592784) ;Speziale, Giuseppe (7003720477) ;Girardi, Leonard N. (7005493576)Taggart, David P. (7102253640)BACKGROUND The use of radial-artery grafts for coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) may result in better postoperative outcomes than the use of saphenous-vein grafts. However, randomized, controlled trials comparing radial-artery grafts and saphenous-vein grafts have been individually underpowered to detect differences in clinical outcomes. We performed a patient-level combined analysis of randomized, controlled trials to compare radial-artery grafts and saphenous-vein grafts for CABG. METHODS Six trials were identified. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was graft patency on follow-up angiography. Mixed-effects Cox regression models were used to estimate the treatment effect on the outcomes. RESULTS A total of 1036 patients were included in the analysis (534 patients with radialartery grafts and 502 patients with saphenous-vein grafts). After a mean (±SD) follow-up time of 60±30 months, the incidence of adverse cardiac events was significantly lower in association with radial-artery grafts than with saphenousvein grafts (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.90; P = 0.01). At follow-up angiography (mean follow-up, 50±30 months), the use of radial-artery grafts was also associated with a significantly lower risk of occlusion (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.70; P<0.001). As compared with the use of saphenous-vein grafts, the use of radial-artery grafts was associated with a nominally lower incidence of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.99; P = 0.04) and a lower incidence of repeat revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63; P<0.001) but not a lower incidence of death from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41; P = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS As compared with the use of saphenous-vein grafts, the use of radial-artery grafts for CABG resulted in a lower rate of adverse cardiac events and a higher rate of patency at 5 years of follow-up. (Funded by Weill Cornell Medicine and others.). © 2018 Massachusetts Medical Society.
