Browsing by Author "Filipovic, Ivana (57218620132)"

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the presencf gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on maternal and fetal perinatal parameters, as well tvaluate the influencf GDM on neonataarly motoric development. Materials and Methods: In this prospectivtudy, wvaluated 203 eligible participants that were admitted tbstetrics department for a labor. GDM was assessed by evaluation of maternal parameters, fetal parameters, as well its impact on infants early motoric development (Alberta Infant Motor Scale—AIMS). Results: Presencf GDM was significantly positively associated with: Pre-pregnancy weight, obesity degree, weight at delivery, gestational weight gain (GWG), body mass index (BMI) at delivery, GWG and increased pre-pregnancy BMI, glucose levels in mother’s venous blood after the delivery, positivamily history for cardiovascular disease, pregnancy-related hypertension, congenital thrombophilia, drug use in pregnancy, largor gestational age (LGA), modf delivery (Cesarean section and instrumental delivery). Likewise, GDM association was detected for tested ultrasound parameters (biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), femoral length (FL)), length at birth, birth weight, newborn’s head circumference, newborn’s chest circumference, AIMupination and pronation at three months, AIMupination, pronation, sitting and standing at six months. Only Amniotic Fluid Index and AIMupination at three months of infant’s agemained significantly associated in multivariategression model. Conclusion: The presencf significant positive association of numerous tested parameters in outudy on perinatautcomes and early motoric development, points to the necessity of establishing appropriate clinical decision-makintrategies for all pregnant woman at risk and emphasize the importancf providing adequate glycaemia controptions and furtheegulaollow ups during the pregnancy. © 2021 by the authors.

[No abstract available]

Objective: To assess torsion outcomes and evaluates the rate of testicular atrophy. Methods: The study was done over the 2000-2024 period during which 103 patients of average age 12.9 ± 3.0 were echosonographically followed up after operative detorquation and testicular salvage. The study included three groups based on the timing of intervention: Group 1 “<6 hours,” Group 2 “6-12 hours,” and Group 3 “>12 hours.” The median follow-up for all groups was 65 (60-84) months. Results: The presence of a detorsed testis was significantly higher in the Group 1 where all cases had existing testis, compared to 64.7% in the Group 2 and only 20.8% in the Group 3 (P <.001). The detorsed testis volume was significantly larger in the Group 1 compared to the Group 2 and the Group 3 (P <.001 for both comparisons). The analysis of blood flow through the testis revealed significant differences between the groups (P <.001). The structure homogenousness was present in 20 (55.6%) patients in the Group 1, and non-existent in all the patients in the Group 2 and the Group 3, (P <.001). Conclusion: The risk of testicular atrophy after many years of follow-up is significantly higher compared to the current literature. Testicular salvage is not possible if more than 6 hours have passed since the onset of symptoms. The high incidence of heterogeneous presentation on ultrasound of salvaged testes, which did not show signs of atrophy, raises the question of the possible harmful impact of salvaged testes on male fertility. © 2025 Elsevier Inc.

Background: The aim of our study was to assess the influence of prepregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) changes as well as excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) on maternal and fetal perinatal parameters. Furthermore, we aimed to analyze the influence of increased prepregnancy BMI values and excessive GWG on neonatal early motoric development. Methods: The 203 eligible female participants were evaluated. Prepregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) defined according to Institute of Medicine 2009 guidelines in the USA were assessed with tested maternal and fetal perinatal parameters and infants early motoric development (Alberta Infant Motor Scale—AIMS). Results: Significant predictors of increased prepregnancy BMI in perinatal period include: weight at delivery (p = 0.001), GWG (p = 0.002) and BMI at delivery (p < 0.001), while significant predictors of excessive GWG in perinatal period are: prepregnancy BMI (p = 0.029) and BMI at delivery (p < 0.001). In the group of participants with both increased prepregnancy BMI and excessive GWG versus others, significant predictors were: hypertension (HTA) (p = 0.019), amniotic fluid index (AFI) (p = 0.047), Pronation (AIMS) (p = 0.028) and Supination (AIMS) (p = 0.029). Conclusion: Increased prepregnancy BMI and excessive GWG are significantly associated with numerous perinatal factors that could alter the pregnancy course, pregnancy outcome and early motoric development of newborn. Moreover, increased prepregnancy BMI is shown to be a significant predictor of excessive GWG; thus, early selection of pregnant women for close monitoring of weight gain during pregnancy will have positive effects on reducing the risk of less favorable pregnancy course and early motoric development of newborn. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Background: The aim of our study was to assess the influence of prepregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) changes as well as excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) on maternal and fetal perinatal parameters. Furthermore, we aimed to analyze the influence of increased prepregnancy BMI values and excessive GWG on neonatal early motoric development. Methods: The 203 eligible female participants were evaluated. Prepregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) defined according to Institute of Medicine 2009 guidelines in the USA were assessed with tested maternal and fetal perinatal parameters and infants early motoric development (Alberta Infant Motor Scale—AIMS). Results: Significant predictors of increased prepregnancy BMI in perinatal period include: weight at delivery (p = 0.001), GWG (p = 0.002) and BMI at delivery (p < 0.001), while significant predictors of excessive GWG in perinatal period are: prepregnancy BMI (p = 0.029) and BMI at delivery (p < 0.001). In the group of participants with both increased prepregnancy BMI and excessive GWG versus others, significant predictors were: hypertension (HTA) (p = 0.019), amniotic fluid index (AFI) (p = 0.047), Pronation (AIMS) (p = 0.028) and Supination (AIMS) (p = 0.029). Conclusion: Increased prepregnancy BMI and excessive GWG are significantly associated with numerous perinatal factors that could alter the pregnancy course, pregnancy outcome and early motoric development of newborn. Moreover, increased prepregnancy BMI is shown to be a significant predictor of excessive GWG; thus, early selection of pregnant women for close monitoring of weight gain during pregnancy will have positive effects on reducing the risk of less favorable pregnancy course and early motoric development of newborn. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.