Browsing by Author "Djukić, Vladimir (57210262273)"

Background/Aims: Liver resections are still one of the most challenging operations. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficiency and safety of the intrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach vs. classical Hilar dissection in major hepatectomies. Methodology: Thirty-four patients were assigned to the Glissonean approach (GA, n=34), while the Hilar dissection were assessed as historical control, matched for the age, gender, comorbidities and Child-Pugh score (HD, n=34). Results: The GA was associated with significantly shorter surgery duration (191.18±41.10 vs. 246.62± 56.55), transection time (38.94±14.56 vs. 56.32±19.40) and ischemic duration (26.03±11.27 vs. 41.18±12.80) than HD (p<0.001 for all). The amount of blood loss was significantly lower in GA (245.59±169.39 vs. 344.71±166.25; p=0.018). The amount of blood transfusion was significantly lower in GA during surgery (322.86±102.07 vs. 414.76±135.48) as well as postoperatively than HD (246.67±5.77 vs. 336.67±120.55) (p=0.038 and p=0.026. respectively). Conclusions: Major hepatectomy can be performed more easily using the Glissonean pedicle approach than by hilar dissection. En-masse transection of pedicles, as well as hepatic veins, using endo-GIA vascular stapler could be performed safely. Liver surgeons should know the Glissonean pedicle approach. © H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing S.A.

Introduction Despite the fact that treatment of liver injuries has dramatically evolved, severe liver traumas in polytraumatic patients still have a significant morbidity and mortality. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the options for surgical management of severe liver trauma as well as the outcome. Methods In this retrospective study 70 polytraumatic patients with severe (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma [AAST] grade III–V) blunt liver injuries were operated on at the Clinic for Emergency Surgery. Results Mean age of patients was 48.26±16.80 years; 82.8% of patients were male. Road traffic accident was the leading cause of trauma, seen in 63 patients (90.0%). Primary repair was performed in 36 patients (51.4%), while damage control with perihepatic packing was done in 34 (48.6%). Complications related to the liver occurred in 14 patients (20.0%). Liver related mortality was 17.1%. Non-survivors had a significantly higher AAST grade (p=0.0001), higher aspartate aminotransferase level (p=0.01), lower hemoglobin level (p=0.0001), associated brain injury (p=0.0001), perioperative complications (p=0.001) and higher transfusion score (p=0.0001). The most common cause of mortality in the “early period” was uncontrolled bleeding, in the “late period” mortality was caused by sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Conclusion Patients with high-grade liver trauma who present with hemorrhagic shock and associated severe injury should be managed operatively. Mortality from liver trauma is high for patients with higher AAST grade of injury, associated brain injury and massive transfusion score. © 2015, Serbia Medical Society. All rights reserved.

Background/Aim. The incidence of nodular thyroid disease increases significantly with age as well as the incidence and aggressiveness of thyroid cancers. The aim of the study was to determine whether thyroid surgery for geriatric patients is safe in a short hospital stay surgery setting. Methods. In this retrospective study, medical histories of all operated geriatric patients (65 years and older), in whom a total thyroidectomy (TT) or hemithyroidectomy (HT) was performed from January 2012 to December 2018, were analyzed. A total of 976 patients were operated on for thyroid diseases in the mentioned period, out of which 247 geriatric patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patients with thyroid reoperations and simultaneous neck lymph node dissections were excluded from the study. The geriatric patients were divided into two groups: the HT group (33 patients) and the TT group (214 patients). Each of these two geriatric groups, HT and TT, had two additional paired control groups. Control group I consisted of younger subjects from 20–44 years, and control group II included middle-aged subjects from 45–64 years. Results. All three TT groups – geriatric, control I, and control II, had 214 patients each, and all three HT groups had 33 patients each. In all three HT groups, the average hospital stay was 24 hrs, while in the TT geriatric group, 150 (70.1%) of 214 patients spent 24 hrs at the hospital. In the geriatric population, the incidence of neck swelling and increased drainage output were higher compared to both control groups, and thus the need for longer hospitalizations. When the age was compared, it was shown that subjects with each subsequent year of intervention had a 22% lower chance of developing complications, and regarding the pathohistological finding, benign thyroid hyperplasia was less likely to develop complications compared to malignant hyperplasia. Conclusion. According to the study, TT can be safely performed within the concept of a short hospital stay in patients under 65 years, while in the elderly, hospitalization days may be extended due to more frequent surgical and nonsurgical complications. Speaking of HT, the short hospital stay is safe for all age groups. © 2023 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.

Background/Aims: Liver resection is a demanding procedure due to the risk of massive blood loss. Different instruments for liver transection are available today. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to analyze the efficacy of three different parenchyma transection techniques of liver resection. Methodology: A total of 60 non-cirrhotic patients undergoing hepatectomy were randomly selected for clamp crushing technique (CRUSH), ultrasonic dissection (CUSA) or bipolar device (LigaSure), n=20 in each group. All patients had liver resection under low central venous pressure anaesthesia (CVP), with ischemic preconditioning and intermittent inflow occlusion. Primary endpoints were surgery duration, transection duration, cumulative pedicle clamping time, intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion. Secondary endpoints included the postoperative liver injury, postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results: Overall surgery duration was 295 vs. 270 vs. 240min for LigaSure, CUSA and Clamp Crushing Technique, respectively. The transection duration was 85 vs. 52.5 vs. 40 minutes, respectively. These three different resection techniques of non-cirrhotic liver produced similar outcome in terms of intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, postoperative complications and mortality. Conclusions: The Clump Crushing Technique, CUSA and Liga Sure are equally safe for resection of non-cirrhotic liver. Liver resections can be performed safely if the entire concept is well designed and the choice of dissection device does not affect the outcome of hepatectomy. © H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing S.A.