Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Deharo, Jean-Calude (7004231392)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    Patients' knowledge and attitudes regarding living with implantable electronic devices: Results of a multicentre, multinational patient survey conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association
    (2018)
    Haugaa, Kristina Hermann (24733615600)
    ;
    Potpara, Tatjana S. (57216792589)
    ;
    Boveda, Serge (6701478201)
    ;
    Deharo, Jean-Calude (7004231392)
    ;
    Chen, Jian (15769086600)
    ;
    Dobreanu, Dan (6505986034)
    ;
    Fumagalli, Stefano (57190111211)
    ;
    Lenarczyk, Radoslaw (6603516741)
    ;
    Hernandez Madrid, Antonio (57208118344)
    ;
    Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard (7202517549)
    ;
    Sciarrafia, Elena (56642855400)
    ;
    Taborsky, Milos (7004445570)
    ;
    Tilz, Roland Richard (16065182300)
    ;
    Pieragnoli, Paolo (6602152838)
    ;
    Przybylski, Andrzej (7004327808)
    ;
    Dagres, Nikolaos (7003639393)
    The purpose of this patient survey was to analyse the knowledge, experiences, and attitudes regarding cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) in patients with pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), or cardiac resynchronization devices. Of the 1644 patients with CIEDs from seven European countries, 88% were over 50 years of age. Most patients (90%) knew what device they were implanted with and felt sufficiently informed about the indications for therapy. As many as 42% of patients needed additional information on the battery replacement and limitations in physical activity. The self-reported incidence of complications was 9%, and among these, a quarter of the respondents felt insufficiently informed about the possibility of complications and their management. The majority of patients (83%) were followed by face-to-face visits, which was the most commonly preferred follow-up strategy by the patients. Nearly 75% of the patients reported improved quality of life after device implantation, but about 40% had worries about their device. Less than 20% had discussed with their physician or thought about device handling in the end-of-life circumstances or end-stage disease. Notably, almost 20% of the ICD patients did not wish to answer the question regarding what they wanted to be done with their ICD in case of end-stage disease, indicating the challenges in approaching these issues. © 2016 The Author.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback