Browsing by Author "Christoff, George (55941056200)"

Background: Although it has been shown that allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is well-tolerated in children, systematic and prospective surveillance of AIT safety in real life settings is needed. Methods: The multinational Allergen Immunotherapy Adverse Events Registry (ADER) was designed to address AIT safety in real life clinical practice. Data on children ≤18 years old with respiratory allergies undergoing AIT were retrieved. Patient- and AIT-related features were collected and analyzed. The characteristics of adverse events (AE) and risk factors were evaluated. Results: A total of 851 patients, 11.3 ± 3.4 years old, with rhinitis only (47.6%); asthma and rhinitis (44.5%); asthma (7.9%), receiving 998 AIT courses were analyzed. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) accounted for 51% of the courses. In 84.5% of patients only one AIT treatment was prescribed. Pollen was the most frequent sensitizer (57.1%), followed by mites (53.4%), molds (18.2%) and epithelia (16.7%). Local and systemic AEs were reported in 85 patients (9.9%). Most AEs (83.1%) were mild and occurred in <30 min (87%). Respiratory and cutaneous symptoms were more frequent. Only 4 patients (0.47%) had severe AE (none after 6 weeks of maintenance). The risk of AE was higher in patients undergoing SCIT. Conclusions: AIT is safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents with respiratory allergies in real-life clinical practice. Though SCIT is more prone to AE compared to SLIT, overall severe reactions are rare and occur during build-up and early maintenance. © 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

Background: Although it has been shown that allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is well-tolerated in children, systematic and prospective surveillance of AIT safety in real life settings is needed. Methods: The multinational Allergen Immunotherapy Adverse Events Registry (ADER) was designed to address AIT safety in real life clinical practice. Data on children ≤18 years old with respiratory allergies undergoing AIT were retrieved. Patient- and AIT-related features were collected and analyzed. The characteristics of adverse events (AE) and risk factors were evaluated. Results: A total of 851 patients, 11.3 ± 3.4 years old, with rhinitis only (47.6%); asthma and rhinitis (44.5%); asthma (7.9%), receiving 998 AIT courses were analyzed. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) accounted for 51% of the courses. In 84.5% of patients only one AIT treatment was prescribed. Pollen was the most frequent sensitizer (57.1%), followed by mites (53.4%), molds (18.2%) and epithelia (16.7%). Local and systemic AEs were reported in 85 patients (9.9%). Most AEs (83.1%) were mild and occurred in <30 min (87%). Respiratory and cutaneous symptoms were more frequent. Only 4 patients (0.47%) had severe AE (none after 6 weeks of maintenance). The risk of AE was higher in patients undergoing SCIT. Conclusions: AIT is safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents with respiratory allergies in real-life clinical practice. Though SCIT is more prone to AE compared to SLIT, overall severe reactions are rare and occur during build-up and early maintenance. © 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

Background: Registries can yield important insights on allergen immunotherapy (AIT) outcomes in daily clinical practice. However, systematic recordings of adverse events (AE) due to AIT in real-life are lacking. Methods: The Allergen Immunotherapy Adverse Events Registry (ADER) is a prospective, multicenter registry on real-life AIT safety. Data on adults (>18 years old) with respiratory allergies receiving AIT with mites, pollens, epithelia, and/or molds were retrieved and analyzed from ADER. The frequency, characteristics and risk factors of AE were investigated. The MedDRA terminology was used to record AE. Results: A total of 1545 individuals with a mean age of 33 ± 10 years receiving 1815 AIT courses (n = 1060 sublingual (SLIT); n = 755 subcutaneous (SCIT)) in centers from eight countries were included. Patients had allergic rhinitis (65%) or, asthma only (3.7%) or rhinitis with asthma (31.2%). Grass was the most frequent specific sensitizer (60.7%), followed by mites (45.5%), birch pollen (20.6%), epithelia (16.1%), and molds (8%). There were 296 AE recorded in 115 patients (7.4%). A higher frequency of AE occurred during up-dosing (59%) compared to maintenance. Severe reactions were rare (0.2%), all in the context of SCIT. After 6 weeks of maintenance only one moderate AE was recorded. The most frequently reported symptoms were from the respiratory system and the skin. Having asthma, doing SCIT, AIT with mugwort, cat, or birch were associated with higher risk for AE while the use of allergoids induced lower risk. Conclusion: In real life clinical practice, AIT-associated AE occur in a minority of patients, while severe reactions are rare. The presence of asthma and use of SCIT are risk factors, while the use of modified allergens lowers the risk. © 2024 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Background: Registries can yield important insights on allergen immunotherapy (AIT) outcomes in daily clinical practice. However, systematic recordings of adverse events (AE) due to AIT in real-life are lacking. Methods: The Allergen Immunotherapy Adverse Events Registry (ADER) is a prospective, multicenter registry on real-life AIT safety. Data on adults (>18 years old) with respiratory allergies receiving AIT with mites, pollens, epithelia, and/or molds were retrieved and analyzed from ADER. The frequency, characteristics and risk factors of AE were investigated. The MedDRA terminology was used to record AE. Results: A total of 1545 individuals with a mean age of 33 ± 10 years receiving 1815 AIT courses (n = 1060 sublingual (SLIT); n = 755 subcutaneous (SCIT)) in centers from eight countries were included. Patients had allergic rhinitis (65%) or, asthma only (3.7%) or rhinitis with asthma (31.2%). Grass was the most frequent specific sensitizer (60.7%), followed by mites (45.5%), birch pollen (20.6%), epithelia (16.1%), and molds (8%). There were 296 AE recorded in 115 patients (7.4%). A higher frequency of AE occurred during up-dosing (59%) compared to maintenance. Severe reactions were rare (0.2%), all in the context of SCIT. After 6 weeks of maintenance only one moderate AE was recorded. The most frequently reported symptoms were from the respiratory system and the skin. Having asthma, doing SCIT, AIT with mugwort, cat, or birch were associated with higher risk for AE while the use of allergoids induced lower risk. Conclusion: In real life clinical practice, AIT-associated AE occur in a minority of patients, while severe reactions are rare. The presence of asthma and use of SCIT are risk factors, while the use of modified allergens lowers the risk. © 2024 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

[No abstract available]

[No abstract available]

The traditional healthcare model is focused on diseases (medicine and natural science) and does not acknowledge patients’ resources and abilities to be experts in their own lives based on their lived experiences. Improving healthcare safety, quality, and coordination, as well as quality of life, is an important aim in the care of patients with chronic conditions. Person-centered care needs to ensure that people's values and preferences guide clinical decisions. This paper reviews current knowledge to develop (1) digital care pathways for rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity and (2) digitally enabled, person-centered care.1 It combines all relevant research evidence, including the so-called real-world evidence, with the ultimate goal to develop digitally enabled, patient-centered care. The paper includes (1) Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA), a 2-decade journey, (2) Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), the evidence-based model of guidelines in airway diseases, (3) mHealth impact on airway diseases, (4) From guidelines to digital care pathways, (5) Embedding Planetary Health, (6) Novel classification of rhinitis and asthma, (7) Embedding real-life data with population-based studies, (8) The ARIA-EAACI (European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology) strategy for the management of airway diseases using digital biomarkers, (9) Artificial intelligence, (10) The development of digitally enabled, ARIA person-centered care, and (11) The political agenda. The ultimate goal is to propose ARIA 2024 guidelines centered around the patient to make them more applicable and sustainable. © 2024 The Authors

Older adults, especially men and/or those with diabetes, hypertension, and/or obesity, are prone to severe COVID-19. In some countries, older adults, particularly those residing in nursing homes, have been prioritized to receive COVID-19 vaccines due to high risk of death. In very rare instances, the COVID-19 vaccines can induce anaphylaxis, and the management of anaphylaxis in older people should be considered carefully. An ARIA-EAACI-EuGMS (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma, European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and European Geriatric Medicine Society) Working Group has proposed some recommendations for older adults receiving the COVID-19 vaccines. Anaphylaxis to COVID-19 vaccines is extremely rare (from 1 per 100,000 to 5 per million injections). Symptoms are similar in younger and older adults but they tend to be more severe in the older patients. Adrenaline is the mainstay treatment and should be readily available. A flowchart is proposed to manage anaphylaxis in the older patients. © 2021 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Older adults, especially men and/or those with diabetes, hypertension, and/or obesity, are prone to severe COVID-19. In some countries, older adults, particularly those residing in nursing homes, have been prioritized to receive COVID-19 vaccines due to high risk of death. In very rare instances, the COVID-19 vaccines can induce anaphylaxis, and the management of anaphylaxis in older people should be considered carefully. An ARIA-EAACI-EuGMS (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma, European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and European Geriatric Medicine Society) Working Group has proposed some recommendations for older adults receiving the COVID-19 vaccines. Anaphylaxis to COVID-19 vaccines is extremely rare (from 1 per 100,000 to 5 per million injections). Symptoms are similar in younger and older adults but they tend to be more severe in the older patients. Adrenaline is the mainstay treatment and should be readily available. A flowchart is proposed to manage anaphylaxis in the older patients. © 2021 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

[No abstract available]

[No abstract available]