Browsing by Author "Carrié, Didier (7006798967)"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Stepwise provisional versus systematic culotte for stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised EBC TWO Trial(2023) ;Arunothayaraj, Sandeep (36140221200) ;Behan, Miles W. (8862299400) ;Lefèvre, Thierry (13608617100) ;Lassen, Jens F. (57189389659) ;Chieffo, Alaide (57202041611) ;Stankovic, Goran (59150945500) ;Burzotta, Francesco (7003405739) ;Pan, Manuel (7202544866) ;Ferenc, Miroslaw (8933716300) ;Hovasse, Thomas (25627893900) ;Spence, Mark S. (7103007124) ;Brunel, Philippe (7006007671) ;Cotton, James M. (7102218822) ;Cockburn, James (43661048500) ;Carrié, Didier (7006798967) ;Baumbach, Andreas (56962775900) ;Maeng, Michael (20034699800) ;Louvard, Yves (7004523655)Hildick-Smith, David (8089365300)Background: The multicentre European Bifurcation Club Trial (EBC TWO) showed no significant differences in 12-month clinical outcomes between patients randomised to a provisional stenting strategy or systematic culotte stenting in non-left main true bifurcations. Aims: This study aimed to investigate the 5-year clinical results of the EBC TWO Trial. Methods: A total of 200 patients undergoing stent implantation for non-left main bifurcation lesions were recruited into EBC TWO. Inclusion criteria required a side branch diameter ≥2.5 mm and side branch lesion length >5 mm. Five-year follow-up was completed for 197 patients. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation. Results: The mean side branch stent diameter was 2.7±0.3 mm and mean side branch lesion length was 10.3±7.2 mm. At 5-year follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 18.4% of provisional and 23.7% of systematic culotte patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-1.38). No significant differences were identified individually for all-cause mortality (7.8% vs 7.2%, HR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.40-3.05), myocardial infarction (8.7% vs 13.4%, HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.27-1.50) or target vessel revascularisation (6.8% vs 9.3%, HR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.37-3.34). Stent thrombosis rates were also similar (1.9% vs 3.1%, HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.11-3.75). There was no significant interaction between the extent of side branch disease and the primary outcome (p=0.34). Conclusions: In large non-left main true bifurcation lesions, the use of a systematic culotte strategy showed no benefit over provisional stenting for the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation at 5 years. The stepwise provisional approach may be considered preferable for the majority of true coronary bifurcation lesions. © Europa Digital & Publishing 2023. All rights reserved.
