Browsing by Author "Bursać, Daliborka (16833694700)"

Background and Objectives: Advanced lung cancer is usually manifested by endoluminal tumor propagation, resulting in central airway obstruction. The objective of this study is to compare the high dose rate brachytherapy treatment outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) depending on the treatment planning pattern—two-dimension (2D) or three-dimension (3D) treatment planning. Materials and Methods: The study was retrospective and two groups of patients were compared in it (a group of 101 patients who underwent 2D planned high-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy (HDR-EBBT) in 2017/18 and a group of 83 patients who underwent 3D planned HDR-EBBT between January 2021 and June 2023). Results: In the group of 3D planned brachytherapy patients, there was a significant improvement in terms of loss of symptoms of bronchial obstruction (p = 0.038), but no improvement in terms of ECOG PS (European Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status) of the patient (p = 0.847) and loss of lung atelectasis (if there was any at the beginning of the disease) (p = 0.781). Two-year overall survival and time-to-progression periods were similar for both groups of patients (p = 0.110 and 0.154). Fewer treatment complications were observed, and 91.4% were in 3D planned brachytherapy (BT) patients. Conclusions: Three-dimensionally planned HDR-EBBT is a suggestive, effective palliative method for the disobstruction of large airways caused by endobronchial lung tumor growth. Independent or more often combined with other types of specific oncological treatment, it certainly leads to the loss of symptoms caused by bronchial obstruction and the improvement of the quality of life of patients with advanced NSCLC. Complications of the procedure with 3D planning are less compared to 2D planned HDR-EBBT. © 2024 by the authors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like atezolizumab have improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, especially in the second-line setting after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. However, access to ICIs remains limited in many developing nations. This study evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab as a second-line versus later-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients in Serbia. Methods: This retrospective study involved 147 advanced NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab following progression on prior platinum-based chemotherapy at two academic centers in Serbia. Data on demographics and clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics were collected. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified outcome predictors. Results: The median PFS was 7.13 months, and median OS was 38.6 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 15%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 57.9%. No significant PFS differences were observed between patients treated with atezolizumab in the second line versus later lines. Patients with good performance status (ECOG 0–1) had significantly better PFS compared to those with poorer status (12.03 vs. 1.63 months, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Atezolizumab is effective in both second-line and later-line settings for advanced NSCLC, particularly in patients with good performance status. This highlights the importance of patient selection based on performance status, as well as the need for wider access to ICIs in resource-limited regions. © 2024 by the authors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like atezolizumab have improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, especially in the second-line setting after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. However, access to ICIs remains limited in many developing nations. This study evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab as a second-line versus later-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients in Serbia. Methods: This retrospective study involved 147 advanced NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab following progression on prior platinum-based chemotherapy at two academic centers in Serbia. Data on demographics and clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics were collected. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified outcome predictors. Results: The median PFS was 7.13 months, and median OS was 38.6 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 15%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 57.9%. No significant PFS differences were observed between patients treated with atezolizumab in the second line versus later lines. Patients with good performance status (ECOG 0–1) had significantly better PFS compared to those with poorer status (12.03 vs. 1.63 months, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Atezolizumab is effective in both second-line and later-line settings for advanced NSCLC, particularly in patients with good performance status. This highlights the importance of patient selection based on performance status, as well as the need for wider access to ICIs in resource-limited regions. © 2024 by the authors.

Background: By 2021, the FDA approved the use of the drugs pembrolizumab and atezolizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with high positivity of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC). This approval was the result of statistically significant evidence from international, multicentric clinical studies that all reported increasing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these patients. Methods: In our study, we reported the demographic and clinical characteristics of 79 patients diagnosed with NSCLC with expression of PD-L1 ≥50% from January 2019 to December 2022 at the Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, who received pembrolizumab therapy as the first-line treatment. Patients were divided according to the histological type of lung cancer as adenocarcinoma (ADC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung. In 52 of the 79 patients, PFS and in 32 of them overall survival (censored OS) was shown according to the histological type of tumor, the tumor proportion score (TPS) of PDL-1 expression, and the metastatic status within the Tumor Nodes Metastasis (TNM) disease classification. Independent factors of death outcome were shown by multivariable proportional hazard regression analysis. Results: The study included 79 patients diagnosed with NSCLC with an expression of PD-L1 ≥50%, 50 (63.3%) patients with ADC, and 29 (36.7%) patients with SCC, whose 55 (69.6%) PDL-1 expression was obtained from broncho biopsy (BB). The majority of patients, 49 (62%), had a TPS PD-L1 score of 51%–79%. Median, PFS for adenocarcinoma was 22 months and censored OS was 27 months, while for squamous cell carcinoma, median PFS was 12 months, and censored OS was 21 months. M1b disease stage, which was the most common in patients, had a PFS of 16 months and a censored OS of 18 months. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC in the fourth stage of the disease and with the positivity of the immune checkpoint protein TPS PD-L1 above 50% represents a safe therapy that allows a satisfactory period without disease progression and overall survival with acceptable treatment complications. Copyright © 2024 Lalić, Bojović, Bursać, Bokan, Čeriman Krstić, Kuhajda, Parapid, Tomić and Šipka.

Background: By 2021, the FDA approved the use of the drugs pembrolizumab and atezolizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with high positivity of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC). This approval was the result of statistically significant evidence from international, multicentric clinical studies that all reported increasing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these patients. Methods: In our study, we reported the demographic and clinical characteristics of 79 patients diagnosed with NSCLC with expression of PD-L1 ≥50% from January 2019 to December 2022 at the Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, who received pembrolizumab therapy as the first-line treatment. Patients were divided according to the histological type of lung cancer as adenocarcinoma (ADC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung. In 52 of the 79 patients, PFS and in 32 of them overall survival (censored OS) was shown according to the histological type of tumor, the tumor proportion score (TPS) of PDL-1 expression, and the metastatic status within the Tumor Nodes Metastasis (TNM) disease classification. Independent factors of death outcome were shown by multivariable proportional hazard regression analysis. Results: The study included 79 patients diagnosed with NSCLC with an expression of PD-L1 ≥50%, 50 (63.3%) patients with ADC, and 29 (36.7%) patients with SCC, whose 55 (69.6%) PDL-1 expression was obtained from broncho biopsy (BB). The majority of patients, 49 (62%), had a TPS PD-L1 score of 51%–79%. Median, PFS for adenocarcinoma was 22 months and censored OS was 27 months, while for squamous cell carcinoma, median PFS was 12 months, and censored OS was 21 months. M1b disease stage, which was the most common in patients, had a PFS of 16 months and a censored OS of 18 months. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC in the fourth stage of the disease and with the positivity of the immune checkpoint protein TPS PD-L1 above 50% represents a safe therapy that allows a satisfactory period without disease progression and overall survival with acceptable treatment complications. Copyright © 2024 Lalić, Bojović, Bursać, Bokan, Čeriman Krstić, Kuhajda, Parapid, Tomić and Šipka.