Browsing by Author "Bumbasirevic, Marko Z. (6602742376)"

Objective: Total phalloplasty is rarely performed in children due to the mutilation involved and the dilemma concerning neophallic size in children. We present a musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi free transfer flap for total phalloplasty in children with difficult psychological problems. Materials and methods: Total phalloplasty was performed in eight boys aged between 10 and 15 years. Indications were small penis after failed epispadias repair (4), micropenis (3) and intersexuality (1). A musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi free flap was harvested with thoracodorsal artery, vein and nerve. The flap was transferred to the pubic region and anastomosed to the femoral artery, saphenous vein and ilioinguinal nerve. Two-staged urethroplasty was performed in five patients using buccal mucosa, while in the remaining three a Mitrofanoff channel had been created previously. An inflatable penile prosthesis was implanted in two cases after puberty. Results: Follow-up was from 6 to 53 months (mean: 29 months). Penile size varied from 13 to 16 cm in length and from 10 to 12 cm in circumference. No flap necrosis, either partial or total, was noted. The donor site healed acceptably in four cases while in the remaining four moderate scarring occurred. Function of the penile prostheses is satisfactory. Psychological status is significantly improved in all children. Conclusion: Phalloplasty in childhood is indicated to prevent profound psychological problems related to body dysmorphia. The musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap is a possible choice for phalloplasty in children that enables good neophallic size as in adults. We recommend this surgery to be performed before puberty to ensure optimal psychosexual pubertal development. © 2006 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company.

Introduction: Management of severe penile trauma presents great challenges for reconstructive urologists since these injuries vary from abrasions to total emasculation. A review of our case experience with penile amputation is presented, emphasizing techniques used to salvage or reconstruct the most difficult of penile injury cases. Materials and methods: A total of 13 patients with penile amputation injury referred to us between 2007 and 2016 were analyzed. Mean age at surgery was 16 years (ranged from 4 to 29 years). Etiology of penile amputation (partial or total) combined with management and outcomes were evaluated. Management included different surgical procedures with the aim to achieve good functional and esthetical outcomes. Postoperative questionnaire was used for assessment of patient's overall satisfaction. Results: Follow-up ranged from 13 to 182 months (mean 53). Causes of penile injury were iatrogenic trauma (8), self-amputation (2), electrocution (1), intentional sexual assault (1) and mother's hair strangulation (1). Outcome criteria including aesthetic appearance, urinary function and ability to engage in satisfactory coitus, were noted in 11 cases (85%). Two cases with ensuing complications relating to the total phalloplasty required additional treatment due to urethral fistula. Conclusions: Severe penile injuries should be treated on a case by case basis utilizing the most propitious techniques. We respectfully propose that the needs of such patients are best served by referral centers with extensive experience. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd

Objective To review our experience with severe penile trauma, mechanism of injury, and their treatment modalities in 16 children younger than 18 years. Management of penile trauma poses diverse challenges to the reconstructive urologist, as injuries vary from abrasions to total emasculation. Methods Analysis of 16 patients with severe penile injuries referred to us between 2002 and 2011 was undertaken. The median age at surgery was 13 years (range, 5-17). Etiology of penile trauma and choice of treatment were evaluated. The management included a wide variety of surgical techniques that were tailored to the individual patient. Results were analyzed to define etiology, that is, mechanism of penile injury and to estimate modalities of surgical management and postoperative outcomes. Also, postoperative questionnaire was used, which included questions on functioning and esthetical appearance of participating patients and overall satisfaction. Results The causes of penile injury in these series were traffic accidents (2), iatrogenic trauma (5), self-amputation (1), electrocution (1), burns (3), dog bite (2), zipper injury (1), and mother's hair strangulation (1). The mean follow-up was 46 months (range, 14-122), and examinations were uneventful, except for 2 fistulae formation after neophallic urethral reconstruction. Conclusion The main goal of reconstructive surgery is to have a penis with normal appearance and functions. Severe penile injuries should be treated on a case-by-case basis using the most propitious techniques. © 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Objectives To report our experience of treating severe penile injuries with different causes and treatments, as penile trauma presents a difficult physical and psychological problem, and the type and extent of injury varies from mild to severe, sometimes even with total amputation. Patients and Methods We analysed retrospectively 43 patients (mean age 28 years, range 5-52 years) with severe penile injuries referred to us from March 1999 to August 2007. The causes of penile injuries differed, including iatrogenic trauma (20), traffic accidents (11), burns (three), self-amputation (two), ritual circumcision (two), penile fracture (two), gunshot trauma (two) and electrocution (one). The management required a wide variety of surgical techniques tailored to each patient depending on the type and extent of injury. Results The mean (range) follow-up was 47 (10-108) months. The aesthetic and functional Results, including satisfactory sexual intercourse were good in 35 patients. There were complications in seven patients; infection after implanting an inflatable penile prosthesis in one, protrusion of a semirigid prosthesis in one, urethral complications (one stenosis and two fistulae) in three and partial skin flap necrosis in two. Conclusions Severe penile injuries should be treated on an individual basis, applying different techniques. However, treatment can be effective and safe only in specialized centres. © 2009 BJU International.