Browsing by Author "Bumbaširević, Vesna (8915014500)"

Introduction/Objective The aim of this study was to determine independent predictors and the best trauma scoring system (REMS, RTS, GSC, SOFA, APPACHE II) of in-hospital mortality in patients with severe trauma at the Department of Emergency, Emergency Center, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade. Methods Longitudinal study included 208 consecutive patients with severe trauma. In order to determine independent survival contributors, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. The power of above-mentioned scoring systems (measured at admission to the Emergency center) to predict mortality was compared using the area under the curve (AUC). Results There were 208 patients (159 male, 49 female), with the average age of 47.3 ± 20.7 years. Majority of patients were initially intubated (86.1%) on admission to the emergency department, and 59.6% patients were sedated before intubation. After finishing of diagnostic procedures, 17 patients were additionally intubated, and, at that time, 94.2% patients were on mechanic ventilation. The majority of patients was traumatized in a car crash (33.2%), followed by falls from height (26.4%) and as pedestrians (22.6%). Patients had an average of 24.7 ± 21.2 days spent in intensive care unit. The overall case-fatality ratio was 17/208 (8.2%). In Cox regression analysis only elevated heart rate (HR = 1.03, p = 0.012) and decreased arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) (HR = 0.91, p = 0.033) singled out as independent contributors to in-hospital mortality of patients with severe trauma. REMS (AUC 0.72 ± 0.64) and SOFA (AUC 0.716 ± 0.067) scores were found fair and similar predictor of in-hospital mortality, while APACHE II (AUC 0.614 ± 0.062) and RTS (0.396 ± 0.068) were poor predictors. Conclusion Results of this study showed an important role of REMS, which appears to provide balance between the predictive ability and the practical application, and components of REMS in prediction of outcome in patients with severe trauma and that HR and SpO2 are independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. © 2019, Serbia Medical Society. All rights reserved.

Background and aims: The present study attempted to identify the diagnostic significance of procalcitonin (PCT) in acute abdominal conditions as well as the range of concentrations relating to diagnosis of abdominal sepsis. Materials and methods: This was prospective clinical study. The study included 98 consecutive patients with acute abdominal conditions, divided in sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) group. Results: PCT concentrations on admission were significantly higher in the sepsis group than in the SIRS group (median [interquartile range] 2.32 [7.41] vs 0.45 ng/ml [2.62]). A cutoff value of 1.1 ng/ml yielded 72.4% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity. In a group of patients with abdominal symptoms lasting for more than 24 h, a cut-off value of 1.1 ng/ml yielded higher sensitivity (82.9%) and higher specificity (77.3%). Conclusion: Our results suggest that PCT measurements may be useful for early, preoperative diagnosis of abdominal sepsis. © 2007 Springer-Verlag.

Background/Aim. Presepsin (soluble CD14-subtype) is a fragment of CD14 produced in response to bacterial infections and a novel biomarker of pneumonia, sepsis and septic shock. The aim of this study was to compare sensitivity and specificity of persepsin, soluble CD14-subtype (sCD14-ST) with other biomarkers: procalcitonine (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte count (Le) in mechanically ventilated injured patients, as a marker of pneumonia, sepsis and septic shock. Methods. The prospective study was undertaken in trauma and surgery intensive care unit of the Emergency Center, the Clinical Center of Serbia from January to April 2013. The study included 39 trauma patients requiring mechanical ventilation, and who developed one of the following inclusion criteria: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), sepsis and/or septic shock. On admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were calculated. Seventy-two measurements of four biomarkers (presepsin, PCT, CRP and Le) were performed in 39 patients at the moments of diagnosis of SIRS, VAP, sepsis and/or septic shock (21 when SIRS diagnosis was established, 21 after the diagnosis of VAP, 18 at the moment of diagnosis of sepsis and the remaining 12 measurements were conducted while diagnosing the septic shock). The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was calculated at these points as well. Results. Patients were mainly severely injured (mean ISS = 24.2) and had moderately severe medical condition at admission (mean Apache II score, 14.5). Presepsin concentration significantly differed among all the four groups, except between sepsis and septic shock. The strongest positive correlation of presepsin evinced with PCT (r = 0.741, p < 0.001). The sCD14-ST indicated better performance in diagnosis of both VAP (AUC = 0.909) and sepsis (AUC = 0.899), compared to PCT (AUCs: 0.863, 0.885, respectively), CRP (AUCs: 0.703, 0.677, respectively) and Le (AUCs: 0.668, 0.700, respectively). Conclusion. This study revealed that sCD14-ST is a reliable biomarker for distinguishing sepsis severity. It also showed a good correlation with the infection development as well as worsening in injured patients. © 2018, Routledge. All rights reserved.

History of drug allergy is of major concern during perioperative period. Medical records usually lack documents confirming the stated allergy. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of self-reported drug allergies and their characteristics in adult Serbian surgical population, and to analyze their influence on drug prescription during perioperative period. The study enrolled patients scheduled for general surgery during a one-year period at a tertiary care hospital. They were questioned using a structured questionnaire about the existence of drug allergy and its nature. Medical records were examined after discharge to assess medical prescription during hospitalization. Of 1126 patients evaluated during the study period, 434 (38.5%) reported a total of 635 drug reactions. The most common allergy claim was to antibiotics (68%), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (16.4%) and iodine (3.9%). Women, urban residents and herbal drug consumers were more likely to state an allergy. The majority of reported reactions were cutaneous (72%) and respiratory (34%), while anaphylaxis was reported by 3.2% of patients. Only 38 (8.7%) patients had previously undergone any allergology testing. Retrospective chart review revealed that 26 (6%) patients were administered the drug to which they had reported allergic reaction in the past, with no adverse effects. Drug allergies are frequently self-reported in surgical population in Serbia, which is in contrast to a very low rate of explored and documented allergies. In order not to deny an effective treatment or postpone a surgery, health care practitioners should pay more attention to an accurate classification of adverse drug reactions.

Sepsis is a medical emergency and therefore requires early identification and immediate management, which is not a matter of hours, but minutes. Since the first definition in 1991, sepsis remains a major challenge for clinicians and scientists. Despite significant advances in technology and therapy, mortality and cost of treatment are unacceptably high. Septic shock is the leading cause of mortality in critically ill patients. Cognitive impairment and functional disability were observed after survivors’ long term follow-up. Since its foundation in 2002, Surviving Sepsis Campaign aims to implement global strategies and to raise awareness of the challenges associated with sepsis. The implementation of guidelines and sepsis care bundles resulted in significant decrease in mortality. Hospital mortality is lower in hospitals with high versus low bundle compliance. Still, epidemiological data for sepsis are missing for low-and middle-income countries. © 2020, Serbia Medical Society. All rights reserved.

Introduction Hemangioma is the most frequent benign solid tumor of the liver. It is well known that a giant liver hemangioma carries the risk of spontaneous rupture, followed by hemoperitoneum and hemorrhagic shock with possible fatal outcome. Case Outline This is a case report of the spontaneous rupture of a giant cavernous hemangioma of the liver in an 85-year old patient. The patient was presented with abdominal pain and hemorrhagic shock. Emergency ultrasonography and computed tomography of the abdomen showed a heterogeneous ruptured solid tumor of the right liver lobe, multiple cysts in the left lobe and massive hemoperitoneum. The patient was successfully managed by immediate exploratory laparotomy, surgical enucleation of the hemangioma under intermittent inflow vascular occlusion, temporary perihepatic packing and planned second look relaparotomy. Conclusion Immediate surgical procedure is indicated mandatory in unstable patients with a ruptured giant hemangioma of the liver. Surgical enucleation under intermittent inflow vascular occlusion and temporary perihepatic packing could be a life-saving procedure in those patients.

Background: Severe liver injury in trauma patients still accounts for significant morbidity and mortality. Operative techniques in liver trauma are some of the most challenging. They include the broad and complex area, from damage control to liver resection. Material and method: This is a retrospective study of 121 trauma patients with hepatic trauma American Association for Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade III-V who have undergone surgery. Indications for surgery include refractory hypotension not responding to resuscitation due to uncontrolled hemorrhage from liver trauma; massive hemoperitonem on Focused assessment by ultrasound for trauma (FAST) and/or Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) as well as Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT) findings of the severe liver injury and major vascular injuries with active bleeding. Results: Non-survivors have significantly higher AAST grade of liver injury and higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (p=0.000; p=0.0001). Non-survivors have significant hypotension on arrival and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on admission (p=0.000; p=0.0001). Definitive hepatic repair was performed in 62(51.2%) patient. Damage Control, liver packing and planned re-laparotomy after 48h were used in 59(48.8%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the surgical approach. There was significant difference in the amount of red blood cells (RBC) transfusion in the first 24h between survivors and non-survivors (p=0.001). Overall mortality rate was 33.1%. Regarding complications non-survivors had significantly prolonged bleeding and higher rate of Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (p=0.0001; p=0.0001), while survivors had significantly higher rate of pleural effusion (p=0.0001). Conclusion: All efforts in the treatment of severe liver injuries should be directed to the rapid and effective control of bleeding, because uncontrollable hemorrhage is the cause of early death and it requires massive blood transfusion, all of which contributes to the late fatal complication. © 2015 Doklestić et al.

Background: An accurate and reproducible method for the evaluation of postoperative morbidity is essential for a valid assessment of the outcomes of surgery. However, there is still no consensus on reporting of complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) of complications is a validated system which reports only the most severe complication. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) is a novel scale designed to capture the overall burden of complications. The aim of our study is to validate and compare the CDC and the CCI in the setting of high-risk surgical patients in whom multiple complications are common. Methods: A prospective, observational study analyzed 206 high-risk adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Each postoperative complication was recorded until discharge or readmission within 30 days. The severity of complications was graded with the CDC, and the CCI was calculated subsequently. Correlations of the CDC and the CCI with hospitalization indicators and functional activity on discharge were assessed and compared. Results: A total of 424 complications occurred in 125 (60.7%) patients. The median CCI for the cohort was 20.9 (0-44.9). CD grade II was the most frequent among patients with complications (62/125; 49.6%). The CCI and the CDC have shown a strong correlation (r = 0.969, P < 0.01). Both scales strongly correlated with the parameters of hospitalization, but the CCI showed a stronger correlation to the intensive care unit length of stay (LOS; 0.670 versus 0.628, P < 0.001), postoperative LOS (0.652 versus 0.630, P = 0.041), and prolonged intensive care unit LOS (0.604 versus 0.555, P < 0.001). The median CCI and the highest CD grade were significantly different respective to the functional activity on discharge (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The CDC and the CCI are the effective methods for reporting of complications after major abdominal surgery. The CCI is a more accurate scale for use in high-risk patients and correlates better with the postoperative LOS. © 2019 Elsevier Inc.

Lactate levels are widely used as an indicator of outcome in critically ill patients. We investigated the prognostic value of postoperative lactate levels for postoperative complications (POCs), mortality and length of hospital stay after elective major abdominal surgery. A total of 195 patients were prospectively evaluated. Lactate levels were assessed on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) [L0], at 4 hours (L4), 12 hours (L12 ), and 24 hours (L24) after the operation. Demographic and perioperative clinical data were collected. Patients were monitored for complications until discharge or death. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the predictive value of lactate levels for postoperative outcomes. The best cut-off lactate values were calculated to differentiate between patients with and without complications, and outcomes in patients with lactate levels above and below the cut-off thresholds were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify variables associated with POCs and mortality. Seventy-six patients developed 184 complications (18 deaths), while 119 had no complications. Serum lactate levels were higher in patients with complications at all time points compared to those without complications (p < 0.001). L12 had the highest predictive value for complications (AUROC12 = 0.787; 95% CI: 0.719–0.854; p < 0.001) and mortality (AUROC12 = 0.872; 95% CI: 0.794–0.950; p < 0.001). The best L12 cut-off value for complications and mortality was 1.35 mmol/l and 1.85 mmol/l, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that L12 ≥ 1.35 mmol/l was an independent predictor of postoperative morbidity (OR 2.58; 95% CI 1.27–5.24, p = 0.001). L24 was predictive of POCs after major abdominal surgery. L12 had the best power to discriminate between patients with and without POCs and was associated with a longer hospital stay. © 2018 ABMSFBIH.