Repository logo
  • English
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Bularga, Anda (57211591557)"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Publication
    EACVI survey on investigations and imaging modalities in chronic coronary syndromes
    (2021)
    Bularga, Anda (57211591557)
    ;
    Saraste, Antti (6603934178)
    ;
    Fontes-Carvalho, Ricardo (23097322300)
    ;
    Holte, Espen (23024605700)
    ;
    Cameli, Matteo (36906722500)
    ;
    Michalski, Blazej (14527627100)
    ;
    Williams, Michelle C. (58084596300)
    ;
    Podlesnikar, Tomaz (57188636569)
    ;
    D'Andrea, Antonello (55612687400)
    ;
    Stankovic, Ivan (57197589922)
    ;
    Mills, Nicholas L. (58894726300)
    ;
    Manka, Robert (8839069800)
    ;
    Newby, David E. (57529298000)
    ;
    Schultz-Menger, Jeanette (57221405702)
    ;
    Haugaa, Kristina H. (24733615600)
    ;
    Dweck, Marc R. (12783691400)
    Aims: The European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) Scientific Initiatives Committee performed a global survey to evaluate current practice for the assessment and management of patients with suspected and confirmed chronic coronary syndromes. Methods and results: One-hundred and ten imaging centres from 37 countries across the world responded to the survey. Most non-invasive investigations for coronary artery disease were widely available, except cardiovascular magnetic resonance (available 40% centres). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and nuclear scans were reported by a multi-disciplinary team in only a quarter of centres. In the initial assessment of patients presenting with chest pain, only 32% of respondents indicated that they rely on pre-test probability for selecting the optimal imaging test while 31% proceed directly to CCTA. In patients with established coronary artery disease and recurrent chest pain, respondents opted for stress echocardiography (27%) and nuclear stress perfusion scans (26%). In asymptomatic patients with coronary artery disease and an obstructive (>70%) right coronary artery stenosis, 58% of respondents were happy to pursue medical therapy without further testing or intervention. This proportion fell to 29% with left anterior descending artery stenosis and 1% with left main stem obstruction. In asymptomatic patients with evidence of moderate-to-severe myocardial ischaemia (15%), only 18% of respondents would continue medical therapy without further investigation. Conclusion: Despite guidelines recommendations pre-test probability is used to assess patients with suspected coronary artery in a minority of centres, one-third of centres moving directly to CCTA. Clinicians remain reticent to pursue a strategy of optimal medical therapy without further investigation or intervention in patients with controlled symptoms but obstructive coronary artery stenoses or myocardial ischaemia. © 2020 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback