Browsing by Author "Branković, Miloš (57188840013)"

Objective: The alcoholic liver disease (ALD)/nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (ANI) scoring system was constructed as a response to a clinical need for avoiding the risks of liver biopsy in diagnosing the etiology of fatty liver disease. The aim of this study was to test the reliability of ANI as a noninvasive method to distinguish ALD from NAFLD. Materials and Methods: One hundred and thirty-five patients were classified into two groups, ALD and NAFLD, according to the pathohistological results. Parameters for ANI are aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, mean corpuscular volume, BMI, and sex. ANI was calculated using an online calculator, official site of Mayo Clinic. Results: ANI was significantly higher in patients with ALD than NAFLD (P<0.01). The cutoff point of ANI is-0.66. ANI greater than-0.66 indicates ALD, whereas ANI less than-0.66 yields a higher probability of NAFLD with high specificity (96.7%) and sensitivity (84.1%). The mean corpuscular volume and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio were higher, whereas BMI was lower in patients with ALD than in NAFLD (P<0.01). Conclusion: The ANI scoring system may be used for the estimation of alcoholic origin of steatosis/steatohepatitis and may help in triaging patients for liver biopsy. ANI less than-0.66 indicates NAFLD, whereas ANI greater than-0.66 confirms the alcoholic etiology, but does not exclude the contribution of associated factors toward the development of fatty liver in a Serbian population. © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Introduction Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids is a serious concern of health care workers and presents a major risk of transmission of infections such as human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Objective The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and circumstances of occupational blood and body fluid exposures among health care workers. Methods Cross-sectional study was conducted in three university hospitals in Belgrade. Anonymous questionnaire was used containing data about demographic characteristics, self-reported blood and body fluid exposures and circumstances of percutaneous injuries. Results Questionnaire was filled in and returned by 216 health care workers (78.2% of nurses and 21.8% of doctors). 60.6% of participants-health care workers had sustained at least one needlestick injury during their professional practice; 25.9% of them in the last 12 months. Of occupational groups, nurses had higher risk to experience needlestick injuries than doctors (p=0.05). The majority of the exposures occurred in the operating theatre (p=0.001). Among factors contributing to the occurrence of needlestick injuries, recapping needles (p=0.003) and decontamination/cleaning instruments after surgery (p=0.001) were more frequent among nurses, while use of a needle before intervention was common among doctors (p=0.004). Only 41.2% of health care workers had reported their injuries to a supervisor in order to obtain medical attention. 50.2% of health care workers were vaccinated with three doses of hepatitis B vaccine. Conclusion There is a high rate of needlestick injuries in the daily hospital routine. Implementation of safety devices would lead to improvement in health and safety of medical staff.