Browsing by Author "Bozovic-Spasojevic, Ivana (22952876100)"

Background: Recent evidence brought by novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugates is leading to significant changes in HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) best practices. A new targetable category termed 'HER2-low' has been identified in tumors previously classified as 'HER2-negative'. Daily practice in pathology and medical oncology is expected to align to current recommendations, but patient access to novel anticancer drugs across geographies might be impeded due to local challenges. Materials and methods: An expert meeting involving ten regional pathology and oncology opinion leaders experienced in BC management in four Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) countries (Bulgaria, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia) was held. Herein we summarized the current situation of HER2-low metastatic BC (mBC), local challenges, and action plans to prevent delays in patient access to testing and treatment based on expert opinion. Results: Gaps and differences at multiple levels were identified across the four countries. These included variability in the local HER2-low epidemiology data, certification of pathology laboratories and quality control, and reimbursement conditions of testing and anticancer drugs for HER2-negative mBC. While clinical decisions were aligned to international guidelines in use, optimal access to testing and innovative treatment was restricted due to significant delays in reimbursement or limitative reimbursement conditions. Conclusions: Preventing delays in HER2-low mBC patient access to diagnosis and novel treatments is crucial to optimize outcomes. Multidisciplinary joint efforts and pro-active discussions between clinicians and decision makers are needed to improve care of HER2-low mBC patients in CEE countries. © 2024 Simona Borstnar et al., published by Sciendo.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of breast conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in comparison to radical mastectomy (RM) after NAT in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and patients’ satisfaction with the esthetic outcomes of surgery. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at the National Cancer Research Center of Serbia, Belgrade, from January 1st 2011 to December 31st 2015, on breast carcinoma patients receiving NAT. Treatment outcome was assessed by MDAPI (MD Anderson Prognostic Index). Female patients (n=52) with satisfactory clinical response to NAT and MDAPI scores 0 or 1 were included into the treatment group (NAT-BCS group). The control group (NAT-RM group) consisted of patients (n=52) with poorer clinical response and MDAPI scores 2 to 4. On check-ups, local or distant relapses were noted and both groups were asked to value their satisfaction with the esthetic outcomes of surgery using the Likert scale. Results: OS was 100% in both groups. DFS was 96.1% in NAT-BCS group and 100% in NAT-RM group. Local recurrences were observed in two patients from the age group ≥60 years, with initial disease stage IIIA and “clear” resection margins on frozen section study. Patients in the NAT-BCS group were more satisfied with the esthetic outcome of surgery than the control group. Conclusions: BCS after NAT provides good esthetic outcome and is oncologically safe if adequate clinical response is achieved after NAT and if established criteria for patient selection are followed. © 2018 Zerbinis Publications. All Rights Reserved.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of breast conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in comparison to radical mastectomy (RM) after NAT in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and patients’ satisfaction with the esthetic outcomes of surgery. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at the National Cancer Research Center of Serbia, Belgrade, from January 1st 2011 to December 31st 2015, on breast carcinoma patients receiving NAT. Treatment outcome was assessed by MDAPI (MD Anderson Prognostic Index). Female patients (n=52) with satisfactory clinical response to NAT and MDAPI scores 0 or 1 were included into the treatment group (NAT-BCS group). The control group (NAT-RM group) consisted of patients (n=52) with poorer clinical response and MDAPI scores 2 to 4. On check-ups, local or distant relapses were noted and both groups were asked to value their satisfaction with the esthetic outcomes of surgery using the Likert scale. Results: OS was 100% in both groups. DFS was 96.1% in NAT-BCS group and 100% in NAT-RM group. Local recurrences were observed in two patients from the age group ≥60 years, with initial disease stage IIIA and “clear” resection margins on frozen section study. Patients in the NAT-BCS group were more satisfied with the esthetic outcome of surgery than the control group. Conclusions: BCS after NAT provides good esthetic outcome and is oncologically safe if adequate clinical response is achieved after NAT and if established criteria for patient selection are followed. © 2018 Zerbinis Publications. All Rights Reserved.