Browsing by Author "Bollmann, Andreas (7003870797)"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Impact analysis of heart failure across European countries: an ESC-HFA position paper(2022) ;Rosano, Giuseppe M.C. (7007131876) ;Seferovic, Petar (6603594879) ;Savarese, Gianluigi (36189499900) ;Spoletini, Ilaria (14830856100) ;Lopatin, Yuri (59263990100) ;Gustafsson, Fin (7005115957) ;Bayes-Genis, Antoni (7004094140) ;Jaarsma, Tiny (56962769200) ;Abdelhamid, Magdy (57069808700) ;Miqueo, Arantxa Gonzalez (57222568819) ;Piepoli, Massimo (7005292730) ;Tocchetti, Carlo G. (6507913481) ;Ristić, Arsen D. (7003835406) ;Jankowska, Ewa (21640520500) ;Moura, Brenda (6602544591) ;Hill, Loreena (56572076500) ;Filippatos, Gerasimos (57396841000) ;Metra, Marco (7006770735) ;Milicic, Davor (56503365500) ;Thum, Thomas (57195743477) ;Chioncel, Ovidiu (12769077100) ;Ben Gal, Tuvia (7003448638) ;Lund, Lars H. (7102206508) ;Farmakis, Dimitrios (55296706200) ;Mullens, Wilfried (55916359500) ;Adamopoulos, Stamatis (55399885400) ;Bohm, Michael (35392235500) ;Norhammar, Anna (6603204971) ;Bollmann, Andreas (7003870797) ;Banerjee, Amitava (57208560645) ;Maggioni, Aldo P. (57203255222) ;Voors, Adriaan (7006380706) ;Solal, Alain Cohen (57189610711)Coats, Andrew J.S. (35395386900)Heart failure (HF) is a long-term clinical syndrome, with increasing prevalence and considerable healthcare costs that are further expected to increase dramatically. Despite significant advances in therapy and prevention, mortality and morbidity remain high and quality of life poor. Epidemiological data, that is, prevalence, incidence, mortality, and morbidity, show geographical variations across the European countries, depending on differences in aetiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment. However, data on the prevalence of the disease are scarce, as are those on quality of life. For these reasons, the ESC-HFA has developed a position paper to comprehensively assess our understanding of the burden of HF in Europe, in order to guide future policies for this syndrome. This manuscript will discuss the available epidemiological data on HF prevalence, outcomes, and human costs—in terms of quality of life—in European countries. © 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Treatments for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation(2017) ;Ueberham, Laura (55862121900) ;Dagres, Nikolaos (7003639393) ;Potpara, Tatjana S. (57216792589) ;Bollmann, Andreas (7003870797)Hindricks, Gerhard (35431335000)Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events, which can be effectively prevented using oral anticoagulation (OAC) with either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. Until recently, VKAs were the only available means for OAC treatment. NOACs had similar efficacy and were safer than or as safe as warfarin with respect to reduced rates of hemorrhagic stroke or other intracranial bleeding in the respective pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of stroke prevention in non-valvular AF patients. Increasing “real-world” evidence on NOACs broadly confirms the results of the RCTs. However, individual patient characteristics including renal function, age, or prior bleeding should be taken into account when choosing the OAC with best risk–benefit profile. In patients ineligible for OACs, surgical or interventional stroke prevention strategies should be considered. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery for other reasons, the left atrial appendage excision, ligation, or amputation may be the best option. Importantly, residual stumps or insufficient ligation may result in even higher stroke risk than without intervention. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion, although requiring minimally invasive access, failed to demonstrate reduced ischemic stroke events compared to warfarin. In this review article, we summarize current treatment options and discuss the strengths and major limitations of the therapies for stroke risk reduction in patients with AF. © 2017, The Author(s). - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Quality indicators for the care and outcomes of adults with atrial fibrillation(2021) ;Arbelo, Elena (16066822500) ;Aktaa, Suleman (57204447089) ;Bollmann, Andreas (7003870797) ;D'Avila, André (7004270038) ;Drossart, Inga (57219934633) ;Dwight, Jeremy (59350615900) ;Hills, Mellanie True (55293781800) ;Hindricks, Gerhard (35431335000) ;Kusumoto, Fred M. (7004571454) ;Lane, Deirdre A. (57203229915) ;Lau, Dennis H. (57202546036) ;Lettino, Maddalena (6602951700) ;Lip, Gregory Y. H. (57216675273) ;Lobban, Trudie (26032236900) ;Pak, Hui-Nam (7101865848) ;Potpara, Tatjana (57216792589) ;Saenz, Luis C. (8564574600) ;Van Gelder, Isabelle C. (7006440916) ;Varosy, Paul (57201960726) ;Gale, Chris P. (35837808000) ;Dagres, Nikolaos (7003639393) ;Boveda, Serge (6701478201) ;Deneke, Thomas (55909968600) ;Defaye, Pascal (7003896138) ;Conte, Giulio (41861259100) ;Lenarczyk, Radoslaw (6603516741) ;Providencia, Rui (15769947600) ;Guerra, Jose M. (58036353700) ;Takahashi, Yoshihide (8366679500) ;Pisani, Cristiano (14422894800) ;Nava, Santiago (55152251100) ;Sarkozy, Andrea (8867294000) ;Glotzer, Taya V. (6603040734)Oliveira, Mario Martins (35509269800)Aims: To develop quality indicators (QIs) that may be used to evaluate the quality of care and outcomes for adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results: We followed the ESC methodology for QI development. This methodology involved (i) the identification of the domains of AF care for the diagnosis and management of AF (by a group of experts including members of the ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force for AF); (ii) the construction of candidate QIs (including a systematic review of the literature); and (iii) the selection of the final set of QIs (using a modified Delphi method). Six domains of care for the diagnosis and management of AF were identified: (i) Patient assessment (baseline and follow-up), (ii) Anticoagulation therapy, (iii) Rate control strategy, (iv) Rhythm control strategy, (v) Risk factor management, and (vi) Outcomes measures, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In total, 17 main and 17 secondary QIs, which covered all six domains of care for the diagnosis and management of AF, were selected. The outcome domain included measures on the consequences and treatment of AF, as well as PROMs. Conclusion: This document defines six domains of AF care (patient assessment, anticoagulation, rate control, rhythm control, risk factor management, and outcomes), and provides 17 main and 17 secondary QIs for the diagnosis and management of AF. It is anticipated that implementation of these QIs will improve the quality of AF care. © 2020 Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Utilization and perception of same-day discharge in electrophysiological procedures and device implantations: An EHRA survey(2021) ;König, Sebastian (57197238602) ;Svetlosak, Martin (36926231500) ;Grabowski, Marcin (11140740100) ;Duncker, David (36090817400) ;Nagy, Vivien K. (57190756063) ;Bogdan, Stefan (56281670300) ;Vanduynhoven, Philippe (56112526600) ;Sohaib, Syed Mohammad Afzal (57224759525) ;Malaczynska-Raipold, Katarzyna (57221936454) ;Lane, Deirdre A. (57203229915) ;Lenarczyk, Radoslaw (6603516741) ;Bollmann, Andreas (7003870797) ;Hindricks, Gerhard (35431335000) ;Potpara, Tatjana S. (57216792589)Kosiuk, Jedrzej (55237676500)The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to assess the utilization of same-day discharge (SDD) in electrophysiology (EP). An online-based questionnaire was shared with the EHRA community between 12 and 30 June 2020 and recorded institutional information, complication assessment, recent experiences, and opinions regarding possible advantages or concerns with SDD. In total, 218 responses from 49 countries provided information on current SDD management. Overall, SDD was implemented in 77.5%, whereas this proportion was significantly higher in tertiary and high-volume centres (83.8% and 85.3%, both P < 0.01). The concept of SDD was most commonly used following implantations of cardiac event recorders (97%), diagnostic EP procedures (72.2%), and implantations of pacemakers with one or two intracardiac leads (50%), while the lowest SDD utilization was observed after catheter ablations of left atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. Within SDD-experienced centres, ∼90% respondents stated that this discharge concept is recommendable or highly recommendable and reported that rates of increased rehospitalization and complication rates were low. Most respondents assumed a better utilization of hospital resources (78.2%), better cost effectiveness (77.3%), and an improved patients' comfort but were concerned about possible impairment of detection (72.5%) and management (78.7%) of late complications. In conclusion, >75% of respondents already implement SDD following EP interventions with a large heterogeneity with regard to specific procedures. Further research is needed to confirm or disprove existing and expected benefits and obstacles. © 2020 The Author(s).