Browsing by Author "Bavendiek, Udo (6603181145)"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication DIGitoxin to Improve ouTcomes in patients with advanced chronic Heart Failure (DIGIT-HF): Baseline characteristics compared to recent randomized controlled heart failure trials(2025) ;Bavendiek, Udo (6603181145) ;Thomas, Nele Henrike (57462387700) ;Berliner, Dominik (35763672200) ;Liu, Xiaofei (57194779909) ;Schwab, Johannes (7103000098) ;Rieth, Andreas (56671124800) ;Maier, Lars S. (7006758541) ;Schallhorn, Sven (57208665843) ;Angelini, Eleonora (57208630137) ;Soltani, Samira (57221604303) ;Rathje, Fabian (57196454880) ;Sandu, Mircea-Andrei (59522326400) ;Geller, Welf (57219306461) ;Gaspar, Thomas (35242589300) ;Hambrecht, Rainer (55270627500) ;Zdravkovic, Marija (24924016800) ;Philipp, Sebastian (7005290672) ;Kosevic, Dragana (15071017200) ;Nickenig, Georg (55618199500) ;Scheiber, Daniel (57188684210) ;Winkler, Sebastian (35761822300) ;Becher, Peter Moritz (25025631600) ;Lurz, Philipp (35810676500) ;Hülsmann, Martin (7006719269) ;von Karpowitz, Maria (57218118768) ;Schröder, Christoph (57196280792) ;Neuhaus, Barbara (57204459000) ;Seltmann, Anika (59522013000) ;von der Leyen, Heiko (6604097968) ;Veltmann, Christian (8866550200) ;Störk, Stefan (6603842450) ;Böhm, Michael (35392235500) ;Koch, Armin (7403037285) ;Großhennig, Anika (26025890500)Bauersachs, Johann (7004626054)Aims: This report presents the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the DIGIT-HF trial and compares them with participants from recent trials with improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: DIGIT-HF, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial enrolling patients with symptomatic HFrEF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II and left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤30%, or NYHA class III–IV and LVEF ≤40%), compares the efficacy and safety of digitoxin versus placebo in addition to standard treatment. Most baseline characteristics of the intention-to-treat population (1212 patients, mean age 66 ± 11 years, 20% women, mean LVEF 29 ± 7%) were similar to those in recent HFrEF trials. The distribution of NYHA class II, III, and IV was 30%, 66% and 4%, respectively, and indicates that the patients were sicker than in comparator HFrEF trials. Less patients had atrial fibrillation (27%) than those in recent HFrEF trials, but prescription rates of background therapy with beta-blockers (96%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors (95%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (76%), and diuretics (87%) were high and similar. Overall, 40% of patients were on angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors, 19% on sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and 9% on ivabradine. Rates of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD, 64%) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT, 25%) devices were much higher than in recent HFrEF trials. Conclusions: Patients included in DIGIT-HF display a more severe HF symptom burden and higher rates of ICD/CRT implants compared to participants in recent HFrEF trials, while pharmacotherapy was largely similar. Clinical Trial Registration: EudraCT (2013–005326-38). © 2025 The Author(s). European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
