Browsing by Author "Antic, Andrija (6603457520)"

Background/Aims: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the role of detection of late mesh infection following incisional hernia repair with radiolabeled antigranulocyte antibodies. Methodology: Mesh infection diagnoses were set up with clinical examination and laboratory analysis and confirmed by ultrasonography (US), computerized tomography (CT), scintigraphy with 99mTc-antigranulocyte antibodies and microbiological examination. Results: Of the 17 patients investigated, 6 had a late mesh infection, and 11 had both mesh infection and recurrent incisional hernia. Clear clinical signs of late mesh infection were present in 13 patients. Four remaining patients had non-specific discomfort and recurrent incisional hernia without clinical manifestation of mesh infection ("silent infection"). US was positive in 12/17 patients, CT in 13/17 patients, while scintigraphy with antigranulocyte antibodies in 17/17 patients. Therefore, sensitivity of US was 71%, of CT 76% and of scintigraphy 100%. In four patients late mesh infection was confirmed exclusively by 99mTc-antigranulocyte antibody scintigraphy, while US and CT did not indicate the infection. Conclusions: According to the present results, scintigraphy with 99mTc antigranulocyte antibodies is a useful method for the detection of "silent" abdominal wall infections after surgery, which is very important for prompt and appropriate therapy. © H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing S.A.

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common in colorectal surgery, with rates ranging from 5.4% to 30%. This study evaluated the impact of a perioperative prevention bundle on SSI incidence. Methods: A prospective cohort study with a before-after analysis was conducted from April 2022 to April 2023. The intervention included patient education, preoperative and postoperative chlorhexidine bathing, and mandatory glove change before fascial closure. Results: The implementation of the perioperative prevention bundle resulted in a significant reduction in the overall SSI rate, from 18.5% to 3.8% (P = .016). Superficial SSIs were decreased from 11.1% to 0% (P = .012), while reductions in deep and organ-space SSIs were not statistically significant. Additionally, rehospitalization rates within 30 days dropped from 14.0% to 2.0% (P = .029). The intervention achieved full compliance among patients and staff. Discussion: The individualized approach likely contributed to high compliance, potentially enabling patients to take a more active role in their care. Further research is needed to address the challenges associated with deep and organ-space infections. Conclusions: The implementation of a perioperative prevention bundle, emphasizing patient education and engagement, effectively reduced the incidence of SSIs and rehospitalization rates following colorectal surgery. © 2025 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.

Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is a marker of severe disease. It occurs as combination of inflammation of retroperitoneum, visceral edema, ascites, acute peripancreatic fluid collections, paralytic ileus, and aggressive fluid resuscitation. The frequency of ACS in SAP may be rising due to more aggressive fluid resuscitation, a trend towards conservative treatment, and attempts to use a minimally invasive approach. There remains uncertainty about the most appropriate surgical technique for the treatment of ACS in SAP. Some unresolved questions remain including medical treatment, indications, timing, and interventional techniques. This review will focus on interventional treatment of this serious condition. First line therapy is conservative treatment aiming to decrease IAP and to restore organ dysfunction. If nonoperative measures are not effective, early abdominal decompression is mandatory. Midline laparostomy seems to be method of choice. Since it carries significant morbidity we need randomized studies to establish firm advantages over other described techniques. After ACS resolves efforts should be made to achieve early primary fascia closure. Additional data are necessary to resolve uncertainties regarding ideal timing and indication for operative treatment. © 2016 Dejan V. Radenkovic et al.

Background: We compare the health-related quality of life (QoL) of patients with incision hernias before and after surgery with two different techniques. Methods: In this prospective randomized study, the study population consisted of all patients who underwent the first surgical incisional hernias repair during the 1-year study period. Patients who met the criteria for inclusion in the study were randomized into two groups: the first group consisted of patients operated by an open Rives sublay technique, and the second group included patients operated by a segregation component technique. The change in the quality of life before and 6 months after surgery was assessed using two general (Short form of SF-36 questionnaires and European Quality of Life Questionnaire—EQ-5D-3L), and three specific hernia questionnaires (Hernia Related Quality of Life Survey-HerQles, Eura HS Quality of Life Scale—EuraHS QoL, and Carolinas Comfort Scale—CCS). Results: A total of 93 patients were included in the study. Patients operated on by the Rives technique had a better role physical score before surgery, according to the SF-36 tool, although this was not found after surgery. The postoperative QoL measured with each scale of all questionnaires was significantly better after surgery. Comparing two groups of patients after surgery, only the pain domain of the EuraHS Qol questionnaire was worse in patients operated by a segregation component technique. Conclusion: Both techniques improve the quality of life after surgery. Generic QoL questionnaires showed no difference in the quality of life compared to repair technique but specific hernia-related questionnaires showed differences. © 2022, The Author(s).

Background and Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine the association between presences of fatty pancreas (FP) with the features of metabolic syndrome (MeS) in patients with non–alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and to establish a new noninvasive scoring system for the prediction of FP in patients with NAFLD. Material and Methods: 143 patients with NAFLD were classified according to FP severity grade into the two groups and evaluated for diagnostic criteria of MeS. All patients underwent sonographic examination with adiposity measurements and the liver biopsy. Liver fibrosis was evaluated semi-quantitatively according to the METAVIR scoring system and using non-invasive markers of hepatic fibrosis. Results: Waist circumference (WC) was predictive for increased risk of FP in NAFLD patients. Elevated fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, serum amylase and lipase levels were associated with presence of severe FP (p value = 0.052, p value = 0.007, p value = 0.014; p value = 0.024, respectively). Presence of increased amounts of mesenteric fat was associated with severe FP (p value = 0.013). The results of this study demonstrated highly significant association between NAFLD and presence of FP. The model for predicting the presence of FP was designed with probability value above 6.5. Conclusion: Pancreatic fat accumulation leads to worsening of pancreatic function which in turns exacerbates severity of metabolic syndrome associated with both, NAFLD and NAFPD. © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Backround/Objectives: Colorectal cancer presents a significant quality of life (QoL) challenge as a result of both the disease and its treatments. This study aimed to validate and culturally adapt the Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (CCF-CaQL) for Serbian-speaking colorectal cancer patients. Methods: The CCF-CaQL offers a detailed assessment of the physical, emotional, social, and functional impacts of the disease. This study, conducted at the University Clinical Center of Serbia, involved 150 colorectal cancer patients undergoing treatment. The translation and adaptation process followed the EORTC Quality of Life Group’s guidelines, ensuring cultural relevance and comprehensibility. Statistical analyses, including Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency and Pearson’s correlation for concurrent validity, reliability, and known-groups validity, were performed using SPSS and R software. Results: The Serbian version of the CCF-CaQL maintains strong psychometric properties with high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.85) and significant correlations with the FACT-C questionnaire, confirming its validity. Known-groups validity showed distinct variations in QoL scores based on tumor location, stoma presence, and neoadjuvant therapy status, highlighting its sensitivity to different clinical conditions. Conclusions: The CCF-CaQL questionnaire has been skillfully translated, culturally adapted, and carefully validated through psychometric evaluations for Serbian patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. © 2025 by the authors.

Backround/Objectives: Colorectal cancer presents a significant quality of life (QoL) challenge as a result of both the disease and its treatments. This study aimed to validate and culturally adapt the Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (CCF-CaQL) for Serbian-speaking colorectal cancer patients. Methods: The CCF-CaQL offers a detailed assessment of the physical, emotional, social, and functional impacts of the disease. This study, conducted at the University Clinical Center of Serbia, involved 150 colorectal cancer patients undergoing treatment. The translation and adaptation process followed the EORTC Quality of Life Group’s guidelines, ensuring cultural relevance and comprehensibility. Statistical analyses, including Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency and Pearson’s correlation for concurrent validity, reliability, and known-groups validity, were performed using SPSS and R software. Results: The Serbian version of the CCF-CaQL maintains strong psychometric properties with high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.85) and significant correlations with the FACT-C questionnaire, confirming its validity. Known-groups validity showed distinct variations in QoL scores based on tumor location, stoma presence, and neoadjuvant therapy status, highlighting its sensitivity to different clinical conditions. Conclusions: The CCF-CaQL questionnaire has been skillfully translated, culturally adapted, and carefully validated through psychometric evaluations for Serbian patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. © 2025 by the authors.