Browsing by Author "Žarković, M. (7003498546)"

Purpose: Whereas antithyroid drugs (ATD) are the preferred treatment modality for Graves’ hyperthyroidism (GH), there is still controversy about the optimal regimen for delivering ATD. To evaluate whether ‘Block and Replace’ (B + R) and ‘Titration’ (T) regimes are equivalent in terms of frequency of euthyroidism and Graves’ Orbitopathy (GO) during ATD therapy. Methods: A prospective multicentre observational cohort study of 344 patients with GH but no GO at baseline. Patients were treated with ATD for 18 months according to B + R or T regimen in line with their institution’s policy. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. In the treatment period between 6 and 18 months thyrotropin (TSH) slightly increased in both groups, but TSH was on average 0.59 mU/L (95% CI 0.27–0.85) lower in the B + R group at all time points (p = 0.026). Serum free thyroxine (FT4) remained stable during the same interval, with a tendency to higher values in the B + R group. The point-prevalence of euthyroidism (TSH and FT4 within their reference ranges) increased with longer duration of ATD in both groups; it was always higher in the T group than in the B + R group: 48 and 24%, respectively, at 6 months, 81 and 58% at 12 months, and 87 and 63% at 18 months (p < 0.002). There were no significant differences between the B + R and T regimens with respect to the fall in thyrotropin binding inhibiting immunoglobulins (TBII) or thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO-Ab). GO developed in 15.9% of all patients: 9.1 and 17.8% in B + R group and T group, respectively, (p = 0.096). GO was mild in 13% and moderate-to-severe in 2%. Conclusion: The prevalence of biochemical euthyroidism during treatment with antithyroid drugs is higher during T compared to B + R regimen. De novo development of GO did not differ significantly between the two regimens, although it tended to be higher in the T group. Whether one regimen is clinically more advantageous than the other remains unclear. © 2020, Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE).

Purpose: Whereas antithyroid drugs (ATD) are the preferred treatment modality for Graves’ hyperthyroidism (GH), there is still controversy about the optimal regimen for delivering ATD. To evaluate whether ‘Block and Replace’ (B + R) and ‘Titration’ (T) regimes are equivalent in terms of frequency of euthyroidism and Graves’ Orbitopathy (GO) during ATD therapy. Methods: A prospective multicentre observational cohort study of 344 patients with GH but no GO at baseline. Patients were treated with ATD for 18 months according to B + R or T regimen in line with their institution’s policy. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. In the treatment period between 6 and 18 months thyrotropin (TSH) slightly increased in both groups, but TSH was on average 0.59 mU/L (95% CI 0.27–0.85) lower in the B + R group at all time points (p = 0.026). Serum free thyroxine (FT4) remained stable during the same interval, with a tendency to higher values in the B + R group. The point-prevalence of euthyroidism (TSH and FT4 within their reference ranges) increased with longer duration of ATD in both groups; it was always higher in the T group than in the B + R group: 48 and 24%, respectively, at 6 months, 81 and 58% at 12 months, and 87 and 63% at 18 months (p < 0.002). There were no significant differences between the B + R and T regimens with respect to the fall in thyrotropin binding inhibiting immunoglobulins (TBII) or thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO-Ab). GO developed in 15.9% of all patients: 9.1 and 17.8% in B + R group and T group, respectively, (p = 0.096). GO was mild in 13% and moderate-to-severe in 2%. Conclusion: The prevalence of biochemical euthyroidism during treatment with antithyroid drugs is higher during T compared to B + R regimen. De novo development of GO did not differ significantly between the two regimens, although it tended to be higher in the T group. Whether one regimen is clinically more advantageous than the other remains unclear. © 2020, Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE).

Purpose: Thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TSH-R-Ab) are heterogeneous in their biological function and play a significant role in the pathophysiology of both Graves’ disease and Graves’ orbitopathy (GO). The clinical significance and utility of determining functional TSH-R-Ab in a Serbian collective were evaluated. Methods: 91 consecutive patients with GO were included in this study. Total TSH-R-Ab concentration, referred to as TSH-R binding inhibitory immunoglobulins (TBII) was detected using a competitive-binding immunoassay. Stimulating and blocking TSH-R-Ab (TSAb and TBAb) were measured with cell-based bioassays. Results: Stimulating TSAb activity and TBII positivity were detected in 85 of 91 (93.4%) and 65 of 91 (71.4%) patients with GO (P < 0.001). Blocking TBAb activity was observed in only one patient who expressed dual stimulating and blocking TSH-R-Ab activity. The sensitivity rates for differentiating between clinically active versus inactive and mild versus moderate-to-severe GO were 100% and 100% for TSAb, respectively. In contrast, these were 82% and 87% only for TBII. Seven of eight (87.5%) and one of eight (12.5%) euthyroid patients with GO were TSAb and TBII positive, respectively (P < 0.031). TSAb serum levels significantly predicted GO activity compared to TBII (odds ratio, OR, 95%CI: 3.908, 95%CI 1.615–9.457, P = 0.003; versus 2.133, 0.904–5.032, P = 0.084, univariate analysis; and OR 4.341, 95%CI 1.609–11.707, P = 0.004; versus 2.337, 0.889–6.145, P = 0.085 multivariate analysis). Conclusion: Stimulating TSAb are highly prevalent in patients with GO and show superior clinical characteristics and predictive potential compared to the traditionally used TBII. © 2021, Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE).

Purpose: Thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TSH-R-Ab) are heterogeneous in their biological function and play a significant role in the pathophysiology of both Graves’ disease and Graves’ orbitopathy (GO). The clinical significance and utility of determining functional TSH-R-Ab in a Serbian collective were evaluated. Methods: 91 consecutive patients with GO were included in this study. Total TSH-R-Ab concentration, referred to as TSH-R binding inhibitory immunoglobulins (TBII) was detected using a competitive-binding immunoassay. Stimulating and blocking TSH-R-Ab (TSAb and TBAb) were measured with cell-based bioassays. Results: Stimulating TSAb activity and TBII positivity were detected in 85 of 91 (93.4%) and 65 of 91 (71.4%) patients with GO (P < 0.001). Blocking TBAb activity was observed in only one patient who expressed dual stimulating and blocking TSH-R-Ab activity. The sensitivity rates for differentiating between clinically active versus inactive and mild versus moderate-to-severe GO were 100% and 100% for TSAb, respectively. In contrast, these were 82% and 87% only for TBII. Seven of eight (87.5%) and one of eight (12.5%) euthyroid patients with GO were TSAb and TBII positive, respectively (P < 0.031). TSAb serum levels significantly predicted GO activity compared to TBII (odds ratio, OR, 95%CI: 3.908, 95%CI 1.615–9.457, P = 0.003; versus 2.133, 0.904–5.032, P = 0.084, univariate analysis; and OR 4.341, 95%CI 1.609–11.707, P = 0.004; versus 2.337, 0.889–6.145, P = 0.085 multivariate analysis). Conclusion: Stimulating TSAb are highly prevalent in patients with GO and show superior clinical characteristics and predictive potential compared to the traditionally used TBII. © 2021, Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE).

Objectives: While partial left ventriculectomy (PLV) may improve functional status, the duration and determinants of this improvement are poorly known. This study sought to assess the relationship between left ventricular (LV) shape and function and functional status in late survivors after PLV for non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Methods: We assessed the relations between LV shape and function and functional status in 17 consecutive patients who survived >12 months after PLV for non-ischemic DCM. Invasive diagnostic studies were performed before, early after, at mid-term after, and late after PLV. According to their functional status after >12 months of follow-up, patients were divided into responders (n=10) or non-responders (n=7). Results: After PLV, the LV systolic major-to-minor axis ratio was higher in responders at early, mid-, and late follow-up (P=0.003, P=0.008 and P=0.04, respectively). LV circumferential end-diastolic stress decreased early after PLV, but increased afterwards in non-responders only (P=0.049). LV ejection fraction was similar in the two groups at baseline, and at early and mid-follow-up, but was lower in non-responders at late follow-up (P=0.006). However, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, and LV end-systolic circumferential stress showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusions: It appears that poor functional capacity in late post-PLV survivors is related to postoperative LV geometry. Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of repurposing health care facilities in response to COVID-19 on the access of patients with thyroid disease to health care. Methods: This study consisted of a web-based survey. The survey was anonymous and consisted of forty questions. Results: This survey included 206 respondents. 91.3% of the respondents had health insurance through the Republic Fund of Health Insurance, 9.7% had private or both health insurances, and 3.4% did not have any health insurance. A significant proportion of respondents (60.4%) had to switch from public to private health care to reach a physician and 73.8% had to switch from public to private laboratories. For the 91.9%, this was perceived as a financial burden. Before the pandemic, 83.1% of respondents reported regular follow-up by physicians, which decreased to 44.9% during the pandemic (p < 0.01). 76.3% of the respondents regarded that their thyroid disease was managed optimally before the pandemic, while this figure declined to only 48% during the pandemic (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the medical care of thyroid patients in Serbia. For the patients treated in the public health care system, access to general practice was hindered, while access to specialist care was disrupted. It led to a switch from public to private health care, which was perceived as a financial burden for almost all the respondents. However, private health care proved to be an important safety net when the public system was overwhelmed. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE).

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of repurposing health care facilities in response to COVID-19 on the access of patients with thyroid disease to health care. Methods: This study consisted of a web-based survey. The survey was anonymous and consisted of forty questions. Results: This survey included 206 respondents. 91.3% of the respondents had health insurance through the Republic Fund of Health Insurance, 9.7% had private or both health insurances, and 3.4% did not have any health insurance. A significant proportion of respondents (60.4%) had to switch from public to private health care to reach a physician and 73.8% had to switch from public to private laboratories. For the 91.9%, this was perceived as a financial burden. Before the pandemic, 83.1% of respondents reported regular follow-up by physicians, which decreased to 44.9% during the pandemic (p < 0.01). 76.3% of the respondents regarded that their thyroid disease was managed optimally before the pandemic, while this figure declined to only 48% during the pandemic (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the medical care of thyroid patients in Serbia. For the patients treated in the public health care system, access to general practice was hindered, while access to specialist care was disrupted. It led to a switch from public to private health care, which was perceived as a financial burden for almost all the respondents. However, private health care proved to be an important safety net when the public system was overwhelmed. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE).

Purpose: Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) is a specific inflammatory disorder of the orbit characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical phenotype. The role of thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TSH-R-Ab) has been widely researched, however there is still no evidence that these antibodies have a direct pathogenic role in this pathology. The aim of this study was to examine their relation to the individual clinical features of GO. Methods: Ninety-one consecutive patients with GO were recruited. Total antibody concentration (TSH-R binding inhibitory immunoglobulins, TBII) and their functional activity (stimulating TSH-R-Ab, TSAb) were measured using binding immunoassay and cell-based bioassay, respectively. Results: Both TSAb and TBII levels were significantly associated to the clinical parameters of GO activity. TSAb was a more sensitive serological marker compared to TBII pertaining to eyelid retraction and edema, proptosis, extra-orbital muscle disorders, diplopia, irritable eye symptoms, and photophobia. TSAb, but not TBII, was a significant predictive marker of conjunctival redness, chemosis, caruncle/plica inflammation, eye irritation, and orbital pain, (odds ratio: 3.096, p = 0.016; 5.833, p = 0.009; 6.443, p = 0.020; 3.167, p = 0.045; 2.893, p = 0.032; versus 2.187, p = 0.093; 2.775, p = 0.081; 3.824, p = 0.055; 0.952, p = 0.930; 2.226, p = 0.099, respectively). Neither TSAb nor TBII correlated with the level of proptosis (ρ = 0.259, p = 0.090, and ρ = 0.254, p = 0.104, respectively), however rising TSAb levels were strongly associated to the level of proptosis. Conclusions: TSH-R-Ab were significantly associated with GO’s phenotype. Especially TSAb, as a sensitive and predictive serological biomarker, can improve diagnosis and management of GO. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE).

Purpose: Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) is a specific inflammatory disorder of the orbit characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical phenotype. The role of thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TSH-R-Ab) has been widely researched, however there is still no evidence that these antibodies have a direct pathogenic role in this pathology. The aim of this study was to examine their relation to the individual clinical features of GO. Methods: Ninety-one consecutive patients with GO were recruited. Total antibody concentration (TSH-R binding inhibitory immunoglobulins, TBII) and their functional activity (stimulating TSH-R-Ab, TSAb) were measured using binding immunoassay and cell-based bioassay, respectively. Results: Both TSAb and TBII levels were significantly associated to the clinical parameters of GO activity. TSAb was a more sensitive serological marker compared to TBII pertaining to eyelid retraction and edema, proptosis, extra-orbital muscle disorders, diplopia, irritable eye symptoms, and photophobia. TSAb, but not TBII, was a significant predictive marker of conjunctival redness, chemosis, caruncle/plica inflammation, eye irritation, and orbital pain, (odds ratio: 3.096, p = 0.016; 5.833, p = 0.009; 6.443, p = 0.020; 3.167, p = 0.045; 2.893, p = 0.032; versus 2.187, p = 0.093; 2.775, p = 0.081; 3.824, p = 0.055; 0.952, p = 0.930; 2.226, p = 0.099, respectively). Neither TSAb nor TBII correlated with the level of proptosis (ρ = 0.259, p = 0.090, and ρ = 0.254, p = 0.104, respectively), however rising TSAb levels were strongly associated to the level of proptosis. Conclusions: TSH-R-Ab were significantly associated with GO’s phenotype. Especially TSAb, as a sensitive and predictive serological biomarker, can improve diagnosis and management of GO. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE).

Purpose: The use of thyroid hormones (TH) to treat obesity is unsupported by evidence as reflected in international guidelines. We explored views about this practice, and associations with respondent characteristics among European thyroid specialists. Methods: Specialists from 28 countries were invited to a survey via professional organisations. The relevant question was whether “Thyroid hormones may be indicated in biochemically euthyroid patients with obesity resistant to lifestyle interventions”. Results: Of 17,232 invitations 5695 responses were received (33% valid response rate; 65% women; 90% endocrinologists). Of these, 290 (5.1%) stated that TH may be indicated as treatment for obesity in euthyroid patients. This view was commoner among non-endocrinologists (8.7% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.01), private practice (6.5% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.01), and varied geographically (Eastern Europe, 7.3%; Southern Europe, 4.8%; Western Europe, 2.7%; and Northern Europe, 2.5%). Respondents from Northern and Western Europe were less likely to use TH than those from Eastern Europe (p < 0.01). Gross national income (GNI) correlated inversely with this view (OR 0.97, CI: 0.96–0.97; p < 0.001). Having national guidelines on hypothyroidism correlated negatively with treating obesity with TH (OR 0.71, CI: 0.55–0.91). Conclusions: Despite the lack of evidence, and contrary to guidelines’ recommendations, about 5% of respondents stated that TH may be indicated as a treatment for obesity in euthyroid patients resistant to life-style interventions. This opinion was associated with (i) respondent characteristics: being non-endocrinologist, working in private practice, treating a small number of hypothyroid patients annually and (ii) national characteristics: prevalence of obesity, Eastern Europe, low GNI and lack of national hypothyroidism guidelines. © The Author(s) 2024.

Purpose: The use of thyroid hormones (TH) to treat obesity is unsupported by evidence as reflected in international guidelines. We explored views about this practice, and associations with respondent characteristics among European thyroid specialists. Methods: Specialists from 28 countries were invited to a survey via professional organisations. The relevant question was whether “Thyroid hormones may be indicated in biochemically euthyroid patients with obesity resistant to lifestyle interventions”. Results: Of 17,232 invitations 5695 responses were received (33% valid response rate; 65% women; 90% endocrinologists). Of these, 290 (5.1%) stated that TH may be indicated as treatment for obesity in euthyroid patients. This view was commoner among non-endocrinologists (8.7% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.01), private practice (6.5% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.01), and varied geographically (Eastern Europe, 7.3%; Southern Europe, 4.8%; Western Europe, 2.7%; and Northern Europe, 2.5%). Respondents from Northern and Western Europe were less likely to use TH than those from Eastern Europe (p < 0.01). Gross national income (GNI) correlated inversely with this view (OR 0.97, CI: 0.96–0.97; p < 0.001). Having national guidelines on hypothyroidism correlated negatively with treating obesity with TH (OR 0.71, CI: 0.55–0.91). Conclusions: Despite the lack of evidence, and contrary to guidelines’ recommendations, about 5% of respondents stated that TH may be indicated as a treatment for obesity in euthyroid patients resistant to life-style interventions. This opinion was associated with (i) respondent characteristics: being non-endocrinologist, working in private practice, treating a small number of hypothyroid patients annually and (ii) national characteristics: prevalence of obesity, Eastern Europe, low GNI and lack of national hypothyroidism guidelines. © The Author(s) 2024.