Kozić, Duško (6602538657)Duško (6602538657)KozićLemajić-Komazec, Slobodanka (19639002500)Slobodanka (19639002500)Lemajić-KomazecBjelan, Mladen (55695106000)Mladen (55695106000)BjelanBoban, Jasmina (55089995900)Jasmina (55089995900)BobanSotirović-Seničar, Slavica (12807777600)Slavica (12807777600)Sotirović-SeničarKostić, Dejan (8619696100)Dejan (8619696100)Kostić2025-06-122025-06-122019https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP170424089Khttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85067604888&doi=10.2298%2fVSP170424089K&partnerID=40&md5=ce014d5241a1b1569bbec98ab7681974https://remedy.med.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5944Introduction. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was found to be insensitive diagnostic modality in detecting the abnormalities in patients with vestibular neuritis. Case report. A 32-year-old man was admitted to hospital with clinical signs of acute vestibular neuritis. The conventional MRI was inconclusive, including 3 mm slice-thickness postcontrast study, while the postcontrast high resolution study with 1 mm slice-thikness, detected bilateral enhancement of the vestibulocochlear nerve’s vestibular branch, consistent with inflammation. Conclusion. High-resolution 1 mm or sub-milimeter slices should be perfomed to evaluate patients with vestibular neuritis in order to increase the MRI sensitivity and improve correlation with clinical findings. © 2019, Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.Bilateral vestibulopathyDiagnosisMagnetic resonance imagingNeuritisVestibulocochlear nerve diseasesImaging features of bilateral vestibular neuritis; [Radiološke karakteristike bilateralnog vestibularnog neuritisa]