Browsing by Author "Veskovic, Jovan (56951285600)"

Background: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a severe condition, often co-occurring with depression and anxiety, that strongly affects the quality of life (QoL) in some patients. Conversely, depressive and anxiety symptoms are associated with a 2–3 fold increase in mortality risk and were shown to act independently of typical risk factors in CHF progression. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of depression, anxiety, and QoL on the occurrence of rehospitalization within one year after discharge in CHF patients. Methods: 148 CHF patients were enrolled in a 10-center, prospective, observational study. All patients completed two questionnaires, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Questionnaire Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) at discharge timepoint. Results: It was found that demographic and clinical characteristics are not associated with rehospitalization. Still, the levels of depression correlated with gender (p ≤ 0.027) and marital status (p ≤ 0.001), while the anxiety values ​​were dependent on the occurrence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, levels of depression (HADS-Depression) and anxiety (HADS-Anxiety) did not correlate with the risk of rehospitalization. Univariate logistic regression analysis results showed that rehospitalized patients had significantly lower levels of Bodily pain (BP, p = 0.014), Vitality (VT, p = 0.005), Social Functioning (SF, p = 0.007), and General Health (GH, p = 0.002). In the multivariate model, poor GH (OR 0.966, p = 0.005) remained a significant risk factor for rehospitalization, and poor General Health is singled out as the most reliable prognostic parameter for rehospitalization (AUC = 0.665, P = 0.002). Conclusion: Taken together, our results suggest that QoL assessment complements clinical prognostic markers to identify CHF patients at high risk for adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: The study is registered under http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01501981, first posted on 30/12/2011), sponsored by Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. © 2023, The Author(s).

Aim: Heart failure negatively impacts quality of life (QoL), which in turn contributes to an adverse long-term prognosis. We aimed at identifying biomarker trajectories after an episode of acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) that differ between patients showing average versus impaired QoL 1 year later, thus allowing to predict impaired QoL. Methods: Biomarkers were repeatedly measured throughout the year in 104 ADHF patients. QoL was assessed at discharge and 1 year after ADHF. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to identify predictors of impaired QoL while controlling psychosocial confounders. Results: MR-proANP predicted impaired physical and mental QoL. NT-proBNP measurements were important predictors for poor physical QoL. Conclusion: MR-proANP and NT-proBNP predict poor QoL after an epidode of ADHF. The trial is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as MOLITOR (IMpact of therapy optimisation On the Level of biomarkers in paTients with Acute and Decompensated ChrOnic HeaRt Failure) with unique identifier: NCT01501981. © 2019 Future Medicine Ltd.

Aim: Heart failure negatively impacts quality of life (QoL), which in turn contributes to an adverse long-term prognosis. We aimed at identifying biomarker trajectories after an episode of acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) that differ between patients showing average versus impaired QoL 1 year later, thus allowing to predict impaired QoL. Methods: Biomarkers were repeatedly measured throughout the year in 104 ADHF patients. QoL was assessed at discharge and 1 year after ADHF. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to identify predictors of impaired QoL while controlling psychosocial confounders. Results: MR-proANP predicted impaired physical and mental QoL. NT-proBNP measurements were important predictors for poor physical QoL. Conclusion: MR-proANP and NT-proBNP predict poor QoL after an epidode of ADHF. The trial is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as MOLITOR (IMpact of therapy optimisation On the Level of biomarkers in paTients with Acute and Decompensated ChrOnic HeaRt Failure) with unique identifier: NCT01501981. © 2019 Future Medicine Ltd.

Aims: The Cardiac Lipid Panel (CLP) is a newly discovered panel of metabolite-based biomarkers that has shown to improve the diagnostic value of N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). However, little is known about its usefulness in predicting outcomes. In this study, we developed a risk score for 4-year cardiovascular death in elderly chronic heart failure (CHF) patients using the CLP. Methods and results: From the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly trial, we included 280 patients with CHF aged >65 years. A targeted metabolomic analysis of the CLP biomarkers was performed on baseline serum samples. Cox regression was used to determine the association of the biomarkers with the outcome after accounting for established risk factors. A risk score ranging from 0 to 4 was calculated by counting the number of biomarkers above the cut-offs, using Youden index. During the mean (standard deviation) follow-up period of 50 (8) months, 35 (18%) subjects met the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death. The area under the receiver operating curve for the model based on clinical variables was 0.84, the second model with NT-proBNP was 0.86, and the final model with the CLP was 0.90. The categorical net reclassification index was 0.25 using three risk categories: 0–60% (low), 60–85% (intermediate), and >85% (high). The continuous net reclassification index was 0.772, and the integrated discrimination index was 0.104. Conclusions: In patients with CHF, incorporating a panel of three metabolite-based biomarkers into a risk score improved the prognostic utility of NT-proBNP by predicting long-term cardiovascular death more precisely. This novel approach holds promise to improve clinical risk assessment in CHF patients. © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology

Aims: In heart failure, various biomarkers are established for diagnosis and risk stratification; however, little is known about the relevance of serial measurements during an episode worsening heart failure (WHF). This study sought to investigate the trajectory of natriuretic peptides and multiple novel biomarkers during hospitalization for WHF and to determine the best time point to predict outcome. Methods and results: MOLITOR (Impact of Therapy Optimisation on the Level of Biomarkers in Patients with Acute and Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure) was an eight-centre prospective study of 164 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of WHF. C-terminal fragment of pre-pro-vasopressin (copeptin), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), and C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 (CT-proET1) were measured on admission, after 24, 48, and 72 h, and every 72 h thereafter, at discharge and follow-up visits. Their performance to predict all-cause mortality and rehospitalization at 90 days was compared. All biomarkers decreased during recompensation (P < 0.05) except MR-proADM. Copeptin at admission was the best predictor of 90 day mortality or rehospitalization (χ2 = 16.63, C-index = 0.724, P < 0.001), followed by NT-proBNP (χ2 = 10.53, C-index = 0.646, P = 0.001), MR-proADM (χ2 = 9.29, C-index = 0.686, P = 0.002), MR-proANP (χ2 = 8.75, C-index = 0.631, P = 0.003), and CT-proET1 (χ2 = 6.60, C-index = 0.64, P = 0.010). Re-measurement of copeptin at 72 h and of NT-proBNP at 48 h increased prognostic value (χ2 = 23.48, C-index = 0.718, P = 0.00001; χ2 = 14.23, C-index = 0.650, P = 0.00081, respectively). Conclusions: This largest sample of serial measurements of multiple biomarkers in WHF found copeptin at admission with re-measurement at 72 h to be the best predictor of 90 day mortality and rehospitalization. © 2018 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Aim: Patient-reported outcomes such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are main treatment goals for heart failure (HF) and therefore endpoints in multinational therapy trials. However, little is known about country-specific differences in HRQoL and in treatment-associated HRQoL improvement. The present work sought to examine those questions. Methods and results: We analysed data from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly (CIBIS-ELD) trial, in which patients from central and south-eastern Europe completed the HRQoL questionnaire SF-36 at baseline and the end of a 12-week beta-blocker up-titration (follow-up). 416 patients from Serbia (mean age 72.21 years, 69% NYHA-class I–II, 27.4% women) and 114 from Germany (mean age 73.64 years, 78.9% NYHA-class I–II, 47.4% women) were included. Controlling for clinical variables, the change in mental HRQoL from baseline to follow-up was modulated by Country: Serbian patients, Mbaseline = 37.85 vs. Mfollow−up = 40.99, t(526) = 5.34, p <.001, reported a stronger increase than Germans, Mbaseline = 37.66 vs. Mfollow−up = 38.23, t(526) = 0.68, ns. For physical HRQoL, we observed a main effect of Country, MSerbia = 39.28 vs. MGermany = 35.29, t(526) = 4.24, p <.001. Conclusion: We observed significant differences in HF patients from Germany and Serbia and country-specific differences between Serbian and German patients in mean physical HRQoL. Changes in mental HRQoL were modulated by country. Those results may reflect psychological, sociocultural, aetiological differences or regional differences in phenotype prevalence. More importantly, they suggest that future multinational trials should consider such aspects when designing a trial in order to avoid uncertainties aligned to data interpretation and to improve subsequent treatment optimisation. © 2017, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Aim: To elucidate the prognostic role of procalcitonin (PCT) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) without clinical signs of infection at admission. Materials & Methods: Serial measurements of PCT and NT-proBNP were performed in 168 patients, aged 68 ± 10 years with ADHF followed by 3-month outcome evaluation. Results: Cox regression analysis demonstrated significant predictive value of baseline PCT for all-cause death/hospitalization (area under the curve: 0.67; p = 0.013) at 90th day. The patients with persistently elevated PCT or with an increase during the first 72 h of hospitalization had the worst prognosis (p = 0.0002). Conclusion: Baseline and serial in-hospital measurements of PCT have significant prognostic properties for 3-month all-cause mortality/hospitalization in patients with ADHF without clinical signs of infection at admission. © 2015 Future Medicine Ltd.

Aim: To elucidate the prognostic role of procalcitonin (PCT) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) without clinical signs of infection at admission. Materials & Methods: Serial measurements of PCT and NT-proBNP were performed in 168 patients, aged 68 ± 10 years with ADHF followed by 3-month outcome evaluation. Results: Cox regression analysis demonstrated significant predictive value of baseline PCT for all-cause death/hospitalization (area under the curve: 0.67; p = 0.013) at 90th day. The patients with persistently elevated PCT or with an increase during the first 72 h of hospitalization had the worst prognosis (p = 0.0002). Conclusion: Baseline and serial in-hospital measurements of PCT have significant prognostic properties for 3-month all-cause mortality/hospitalization in patients with ADHF without clinical signs of infection at admission. © 2015 Future Medicine Ltd.

Background: Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. Beta-blocker therapy may lower CRP levels. Methods and results: To assess if the changes of high-sensitivity (hs) CRP levels in HF patients over 12-week titration with beta-blockers correlate with functional capacity, plasma hs-CRP levels were measured in 488 HF patients [72.1 ± 5.31 years, LVEF 40% (33/50)]. Hs-CRP, NT-proBNP and 6-min-walk-test (6MWT) were assessed at baseline and at week 12. Patients were divided based on hs-CRP changes (cut-off > 0.3 mg/dl) into low–low (N = 225), high–high (N = 132), low–high (N = 54), high–low (N = 77) groups. At baseline, median hs-CRP concentration was 0.25 (0.12/0.53) mg/dl, NT-proBNP 551 (235/1455) pg/ml and average 6MWT distance 334 ± 105 m. NT-proBNP changes were significantly different between the four hs-CRP groups (P = 0.011). NT-proBNP increased in the low–high group by 30 (− 14/88) pg/ml and decreased in the high–low group by − 8 (− 42/32) pg/ml. 6MWT changes significantly differed between groups [P = 0.002; decrease in the low–high group (− 18 ± 90 m) and improvement in the low–low group (24 ± 62 m)]. Conclusion: After beta-blocker treatment, hs-CRP levels are associated with functional capacity in HF patients. Whether this represents a potential target for intervention needs further study. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Objectives: This study evaluated the tolerability and feasibility of titration of 2 distinctly acting beta-blockers (BB) in elderly heart failure patients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) left ventricular ejection fraction. Background: Broad evidence supports the use of BB in HFrEF, whereas the evidence for beta blockade in HFpEF is uncertain. Methods: In the CIBIS-ELD (Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly) trial, patients >65 years of age with HFrEF (n = 626) or HFpEF (n = 250) were randomized to bisoprolol or carvedilol. Both BB were up-titrated to the target or maximum tolerated dose. Follow-up was performed after 12 weeks. HFrEF and HFpEF patients were compared regarding tolerability and clinical effects (heart rate, blood pressure, systolic and diastolic functions, New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute-walk distance, quality of life, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). Results: For both of the BBs, tolerability and daily dose at 12 weeks were similar. HFpEF patients demonstrated higher rates of dose escalation delays and treatment-related side effects. Similar HR reductions were observed in both groups (HFpEF: 6.6 beats/min; HFrEF: 6.9 beats/min, p = NS), whereas greater improvement in NYHA functional class was observed in HFrEF (HFpEF: 23% vs. HFrEF: 34%, p < 0.001). Mean E/e' and left atrial volume index did not change in either group, although E/A increased in HFpEF. Conclusions: BB tolerability was comparable between HFrEF and HFpEF. Relevant reductions of HR and blood pressure occurred in both groups. However, only HFrEF patients experienced considerable improvements in clinical parameters and left ventricular function. Interestingly, beta-blockade had no effect on established and prognostic markers of diastolic function in either group. Long-term studies using modern diagnostic criteria for HFpEF are urgently needed to establish whether BB therapy exerts significant clinical benefit in HFpEF. (Comparison of Bisoprolol and Carvedilol in Elderly Heart Failure [HF] Patients: A Randomised, Double-Blind Multicentre Study [CIBIS-ELD]; ISRCTN34827306). © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation.